Federal Judges Research Paper

Article 3, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution states that judges “shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour,” meaning that as long as Supreme Court judges don’t commit crimes, they can hold their position

In the State of New Hampshire judges are appointed. They are nominated by the governor and confirmed by an elected five member executive council to guide the governor. This process is in place to allow residents to have faith in who is being chosen. The lowest tier trial court are called The Circuit Courts. The highest court is the New Hampshire Supreme Court, which is also the only appeals court for the state. There are ten Circuit Courts in the state which serve thirty two district divisions. The 1st Circuit Court serves the towns of Berlin, Colebrook, and Lancaster. The 2nd Circuit Court serves the towns of Lebanon, Littleton, Haverhill, and Plymouth. The 3rd Circuit Court serves the towns of Conway and Ossipee. The 4th Circuit Court

While our nation was founded on the principle of a balance of power, coming from the ideology of Baron de Montesquieu, the Judicial, unlike any other branch, does not have regular elections for its positions or terms like Presidency or Congress. Justices are nominated and confirmed for seats on the Supreme Court for life and have the option to leave whenever they choose to, not when they are voted out of office. An example of this is Justice Stanley F. Reed. He worked with the panels for the D.C. Circuit and

Texas judges with the exception of municipal judges are on average elected in partisan elections which means candidates are listed to show their political affiliation on the election ballot. In the cases where a vacancy is present the governor will fill the position with whom he chooses which happens often enough to possible cause a political party imbalance.

The Texas Constitution governs and backs the legislative process which consist of applicable statues. The two bicameral chambers of legislature is the House and the Senate. The House and Senate adopt actions and rules that are reviewed by these two bicameral chambers. The origin of the bill is the main concern for the legislative process. This is where the bill begins and returns to when it is reviewed by the different chambers. “When drafting a bill, legislation has the ability to request services from the Texas legislative Council” (Henson J, & Morris J Ch. 4). In addition, when drafting the bill they may call in further assistance from the Senate department. The bill may address concerns over particular issues and or special interest that legislature has. The bill can be repealed, enacted, and amended from different members on legislature. The Legislative Board is a review board “that drafts appropriations for the general bill” (Ch. 4). Different bills consist of single or various subjects, an appropriation bill is one of those bills that addresses different subjects.

When selecting judges in Texas many first get their start when they are initially appointed by the Texas governor. Though this usually happens to fill up any vacancies that there may be on the bench (Champagne and Harpham 257). Aside from being appointed by the governor, most judges in Texas get selected to serve by Texas voters. These elections are known as partisan elections, meaning that the judicial candidates’ political affiliation is listed on the ballot. Party affiliation is one of the most important factors in judicial elections. Before 1978, most judges were Democrats due to the state being largely Democratic. In addition, the governor of the state was usually a Democrat and would usually end up appointing Democratic judges (Champagne

The federal government, as you know, is made up of 3 branches. The three branches of government are legislative, executive, and judicial. According to page 197 in the history textbook it states, " Our national's judicial power resides in 'one Supreme Court' " this is known as the judicial branch. What the judicial branch does, the political significance of the judicial branch, and the relations with other branches are all important things to know about the judicial branch. The judicial branch is crucial to our government because it can declares actions of legislature unconstitutional.

The position of a Supreme Court Justice is appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate. Once the appointment is confirmed, the judges “serve until their death, retirement

Our judicial branch is essential in the function of our current government and to make valid the constitutional rights of every citizen. In additional, the judicial branch has is established to make sure there is balance of power within the executive and the legislative branches. With this in mind and being a citizen of this country is important to know that the head of the judicial branch is a person that is well prepared and educated to make a rightful a judgement always. Correspondingly, is important to learn who the current Justices of the Supreme Court are and what are their qualifications. Recently, due to a given school assignment I was able to read more and learn more about our current Chief Justice of the United States and the Associate

They also need to be registered to vote in the district they are running in. It’s mandatory to be thirty-five years of age and been practicing law or been a judge for ten years. The period for the term is six years. The United States only has one court, the supreme court. Congress is able to form and decide on the structure of the courts. Congress can also set the amount of justices there are. The Supreme Court judges have no restrictions on terms and do not need to meet any requirements. The justices leave their duty of the court to either retire, are impeached, or pass away (“Judicial Branch Facts”). The judges are selected by the President to serve and then authorized by the Senate. The Supreme Court of the United States has jurisdiction over the Texas court.

Judge Judy was born Judith Susan Blum on October 21, 1942 in Brooklyn, New York. She attended the American University Washington College of Law in Washington, D.C. where she was the only woman in a class of 126 students. She went on to attend the New York Law School where she finished her law degree.

The Constitution states that federal judges are to be nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. They hold office during good behavior, typically, for life. Through Congressional impeachment proceedings, federal judges may be removed from office for misbehavior.

In total there are ninety-four district courts that are staffed by almost seven hundred individuals. Along with the district courts is the federal court of appeals. They make important decisions about errors within the district courts. In the United States there are currently thirteen court of appeals. Among the many powers of the judicial branch the most important is the power of judicial review. Essentially, the federal courts can “refuse to apply a state or federal law because it, in their judgement violates the United States Constitution.” Judicial review in a way is like checks and balances because it allows one to make sure they are in line with the constitution. It is like a final check to ensure the constitution is being followed correctly. Judges have been granted the power to interpret the law and many question the validity in which they do so. The philosophies by which they judge are called judicial philosophies and include judicial restraint, strict constructionism, loose constructionism and judicial activism. Judicial restraint encourages judges to limit their power. Strict constructionism limits judicial

It is composed of one Chief Justice and eight Associates Justice members. The power to nominate the Justices is vested by the President of the United States, therefore by making attentive judicial selections he can control the judiciary (Lau 45-6).*The power of the president to name federal judges is absolute—he is not required to consult with any other individual in making his choice. As a matter of custom, presidents have traditionally looked to senators to provide names of judicial candidates for consideration, and some presidents are more willing than others to defer to the advice of aides and advisors. For much of the nation’s history, the Senate routinely confirmed the president’s choices. President Reagan’s nomination of Robert Bork in 1987 changed that tradition forever. Alarmed Democrats grilled Bork in confirmation hearings and ultimately declined to confirm him, setting the stage for a new breed of confirmation hearings where senators try to ascertain not just the nominee’s character but also how he or she will judge certain issues. Judicial nominees, especially to the Supreme Court, are under so much scrutiny now that sometimes even the president’s own party will turn against a nominee. This happened to President George W. Bush when he named his close friend Harriet Miers to fill a vacancy left by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s retirement.

Judges and legislators are elected the same way, through partisan elections. They as Democrats and Republicans and are elected by the public, or popular vote- an act of voting by the electorate of a country or area.