Federalist 10 Paper

Another focus of Federalist 10 is the purpose of having a republican government, which is personally the issue raised in Federalist 10 that resonates the most with me. One of the main benefits of a republic in a large government per Madison, is the lack of power given to factions. In a large and diverse republic, there are large amounts of factions across the country, however, they have little power or influence. While in a direct democracy, there is a small amount of factions, but each faction is

With a higher populace comes the ability to have a larger fighting force. Another valid point that Madison brings up is that small republics are often prone to faction, and eventually fall apart. With a large republic, you can “tame” the factions with majority rule, while letting them freely express their opinions. I agree with Madison on many of these points, but I think that he would change his opinion on many after seeing the current condition of the United States. The governing body has grown so large that it has become inefficient and in many areas has lost its ability to do what is best for the

The Federalist Papers is a treatise on free government in peace and security. As described by the article, FEDERALIST PAPERS, “These are a series of eighty-five letters written to newspapers in 1787-1788 by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, urging ratification of the Constitution.” The work of essentially Madison and Hamilton can be parceled into two rule parts; the fundamental discussing the defects of the present government, the Articles of Confederation, and the second looking at the new constitutions assorted fragments of the lawmaking body, official, and

This is a thoroughly incorrect assumption to make. Madison makes a point of highlighting two ways in which a pure democracy differs from a republic. The power to rule in a republic is delegated to a small number of citizens elected by the people, whereas a democracy delegates the power to rule directly to the people. As it is “the people” who compose factions, this creates a greater susceptibility to the invasion of factious sentiment. An intermediary is necessary in order to halt the progress of poisonous factious effects. A republic provides for this intermediary in the form of electors, elected by the people.

Second, by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests. Madison defined faction as any group, majority or minority, within a society that promoted its own self-interest at the expense of the common good. Due to this, there needs to be a check on the government. Sometimes public rights can harm the rights of an individual, and Madison wanted to prevent that from happening. Federalism is another way to control factions. A large republic means more factions will

In the presence of a powerful fraction, there is nothing to protect the minority factions from being overpowered; that a true direct democracy would be incapable of maintaining the protection of liberty, life, and the pursuit of happiness. A large republic government will impart power to elected representatives, making the power of factions to affect the vote is greatly decreased. Madison believes that this type of government should be put in the new constitution.

The only way to manage faction is to remove its causes and to control its effects. By removing its causes Madison believes that liberty will be destroyed, or that by giving every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests, would be impossible because people can never all be the same. Madison wanted the United States to be a republic, a form of democracy in which power is vested in representatives, so there will be a greater number of citizens represented and we will also be able to have more control over the factions effects.

Madison wrote the Federalist Paper 51 presenting and explaining how a branch of government with too much power can become tyrannical, but, if we have them separated, it can protect the liberty. Each branch (legislative, executive and judiciary) should be independent, not having power to interfere in the other two branches, making the citizens the one who are gonna elect their representatives in each branch through elections. Madison claims, "It is of great importance in a republic not only to guard the society against the oppression of its rulers, but to guard one part of the society against the injustice of the other part. Different interests necessarily exist in different classes of citizens. If a majority be united by a common interest, the rights of the minority will be insecure”. It shows the benefits of these factors, discussing how each branch would protect liberty, especially to the minority parties.

Another way that a republic guards against a faction is expanding to include more people. In a large republic each representative will be chosen by a greater number of citizens. The greater number of citizens will make it more difficult for unworthy candidates to gain elected office. Elections are designed to allow people to choose the men that they want to be represented by. People are more likely to choose the man with the most attractive merit and the most established character thus preventing a man with vicious views to gain

In the Federalist 10, it is mostly about the constitution. It was written by James Madison, who oversaw it. The main purpose of this article is faction. In politics, faction is people that group themselves. Madison said that in the republic. Madison says that the number one common characteristic is the largest people. The democracy would be possible because you couldn’t create a majority group of people that would have a lot in common. However now, democracy become too big in this scale. People don’t have much in common. That was the anti-federalist concerned. And now Madison came up by saying that just because there are larger group of people that doesn’t mean they are right with what they should say. Majorities are somewhat dangerous; they sometimes do foolish stuff. Also, they somewhat not to be trusted. Now, the fact that the new constitution republic is covering. Democracy is

Madison thought a large republic was better representatives of the Union are more likely to be enlightened than tainted by local injustices. He believed that the Union is more secure against cruel treatment from a conflicting party because of the variety of

Constitution And To Explain It To The Common People. They Were Written By James Madison,

At the same time, the Federalist Papers were published in 1787-88 as an anonymous paper to voice the Federalist ideals and their opinions on current events by people like Alexander Hamilton and James Madison. These papers are some of the most important U.S. articles made and helped the Federalists win the debate. After the Federalist’s won the debate the Bill of Rights was made, a name for any and all amendments made to the Constitution from there on out. After all of the hard work, James Madison and his Federalist’s won and got a new Constitution and a Separation of Powers, which was the three new branches of government.

Crick states, “Then others hold that, surprisingly enough, democracy ‘really means’ liberty, even liberalism, or even individualism, even to defend the (democratic) individual against the (democratic) majority” (In Defence of Politics 56). Liberty and freedoms to exercise individualism only occur in a democratic state that does not act in a tyrannical manner in which elites only serve their own interests. If government becomes too powerful and unwilling to meet the needs of the demos, the citizenry must be guarded and protect their own interests against the people who represent them. Otherwise, democracy cannot flourish and other forms of government, such as elitism or an oligarchy, become pervasive throughout society.

"Then in democracy," I went on, "there's no compulsion either to exercise authority if you are capable of it, or to submit to authority if you don't want to; you needn't fight if there's a war, or you can wage a private war in peacetime if you don't like peace; and if there's any law that debars you from political or judicial office, you will none the less take either if they come your way. It's a wonderfully pleasant way if carrying on in the short run, isn't it?"(The Republic).