Essay Federalist

The Federalists are, no doubt, trying to help to build America’s government in the benefit of the citizens. The government should have a Central department where the power is able to help the country function properly and smoothly. The Federalists have made it possible by providing the Constitution. This piece of document helps describe the roles the Central Government should have. The constitution is an important piece of document to describe major roles of the Central Government. The constitution is a work of art in the views of the Federalists, and it is proven to show how the Constitution is able to convert our country into a beneficial government. The Constitution explains the significance of each section and how the power is distributed between the Central Government. The Federalists had to create the Constitution in order for the weakness of the Article Of Confederation to never occur again.

Establishing an effective system of government has proven to be an obstacle for centuries. Fortunately, the Founding Father recognized the common flaws of governments, as did many common men in the colonies. Consequently, the ratification of the constitution was vital for a healthy governmental system, though it did bring about much debate and persuasion. There were two main positions which people took during the ratification, those being the Anti-Federalist and the Federalist. The Anti-Federalist were a diverse assembly involving prominent men such as George Mason and Patrick Henry, and also the most unlikely of individuals, those being Farmers and shopkeepers. The chief complaint about the Constitution was that it confiscated the power from the sates, thereby robbing the people of their power. Oppositely, the Federalist believed in removing some control from the states and imparting that power to the national government, thus making America partially national. Throughout this debate, many letters were shared between the two sides, and eventually, it led to the federalist winning over the colonies.

Liberty. This word means many things to many people. There is no way to distinctly define the term without leaving someone's crucial point of view out of the equation.

In this essay Alexander Hamilton had high praise for the United States. Alexander Hamilton always believed of the greatness of America. The groundwork that will consist of the new constitution could be significant. He had out of most of the founders had the highest hopes for the future of the United States. In this article, “federalist number one” alexander Hamilton articulates that the people of America are in an exclusive position to be one of the world’s greatest power. The inefficiency of the government at the time caused many like Hamilton to push the constitution. Alexander Hamilton thought a lot of people would oppose the constitution for variety of reasons. One of the reasons significantly were if

The Federalist Papers written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay are one of the greatest collections of literature from the time period of 1787 to 1788 when the Constitution was being ratified by the states. This collection of eighty-five essays was written for the states, to help them better understand and grasp a concept of why they should vote for the ratification of The Constitution. Why did the Madison, Hamilton, and Jay write The Federalist Papers and what is there underlying meaning? Who were James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay? What was Madison trying to say in regards to the concept of federalism, separation of powers, republics and ratifying the Constitution and why? Each of these questions can be further explored and answered in Madison’s Federalist #51. By analyzing #51, with the addition of #10, clarity can be gained on the meaning behind these essays and there obvious importance to the nation’s history.

The primary source is Federalist paper No. 10, which is a the first of James Madison’s contributions to the series of essays known as the Federalist Papers. This essay is a highly regarded paper among the collection. The Federalist No. 10 is merely rhetoric used to rationalize the benefits of a new system of government, explain how the new union will be constructed and most crucial to the essay, sway public opinion to support the ratification of the new constitution. This particular primary source is imperative to understanding the complexity of the United States government at the time of its birth as well as now. Madison makes an argument that the expansion of the federal government is necessary to protect liberty against the excess of democracy. The document reveals the advantages of a Republic and serves as an explanation as to why the U.S. espouses a Republican form of government and the Constitution.

Federalist 51 addresses the importance of checks and balances in defense of the United States Constitution. By setting up the government in this fashion, Hamilton or Madison argues that no one branch will tyrant over another. His argument mentions that first, each of the distinct powers of the government needs to be divided so that each branch has a purpose of its own and does not overlap the jurisdiction of another branch. This, according to Hamilton or Madison, will lay down the foundation of the government of the United States. The three branches include “the supreme executive, legislative, and judiciary” and “[the branches] should be drawn from the same foundation of authority, the people.” The author calls for a democratic form of government

In order to have a stable government one must first be able to separate its powers equally among its members. James Madison explains how he wants the government to be broken down into three branches, the legislative, executive and judicial branch. This is the case in order to not give anyone more power than the other and to keep members from having little to no communication with members of other branches. Madison wrote Federalist 51 in 1788 in order to state his opinion on how he thinks the powers of government should be handled and distributed. He also talks about his concerns of what could happen if the government is not secure and the troubles that could occur. Madison while writing this essay is wanting to convey what he thinks a powerful government needs in order to survive and have as little problem as possible. He highlights on the powers of the legislative branch should and should not have. In this argument Madison is speaking of how the governments power should be given equally towards each branch because he believes that power can not be controlled by one branch alone.

Between the years 1787 and 1788 John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison wrote a series of eighty-five papers in order to convince people to ratify the United States Constitution. During this time period there were two different sides. The Federalist, who wanted a more centralized government and to achieve ratification of the constitution to help manage the debt and tensions following the American Revolution. The support of this group was strongly centralized

The Federalists believed that a strong national government would be most efficient in leading the country, and would put an end to the challenges that America was currently facing. As described in Document 3, and efficient, protecting and new government was needed to end the distress and complaints of American citizens. The Federalists also believed that the independence that they had just fought for would be lost without a stronger government, with Document 4 describing independence as a blessing that would cease to exist without a strong and efficient government. The Federalists promoted the ratification of this new constitution by explaining that it originated from common citizens. John Jay explains that “The constitution comes reccomended to you by men and fellow citizens who...love their liberty and their country.” (Doc 5). Jay encouraged others to support the ratifcation of this new constitution by appealing to citizen’s love for their country, and that if you love your country and liberty, then this constitution would help to preserve

The early years of the Constitution of the United States were full of political strife. The two prominent political ideals were complete opposites. The Jeffersonian Republicans were focused on giving power to the people and maintaining a pastoral economy, while the Federalists supported the control of the government by the elite class, and maintaining “positive” democracy. Both parties feared the influence and effect the other party would have on the public. In Linda K. Kerber's article, “The Fears of the Federalists”, the major concerns Federalists held in the early 19th century are described. Ever since the war with and separation from England, the citizens of America were seen to be continually drive to “patriotic rebellion” as a way to

The Federalist Papers contains eighty-five essays written by John Jay, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton. These essays were published anonymously under the name “Publius” in several different New York State news articles. The essays were written in hopes of persuading New Yorkers to ratify the United States Constitution. It contains detailed provisions of the Constitution. Today, the Federalist Papers are still in use to help those drafting the Constitution because James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were members of the Constitutional Convention.

The Constitution, when first introduced, set the stage for much controversy in the United States. The two major parties in this battle were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, such as James Madison, were in favor of ratifying the Constitution. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, such as Patrick Henry and Richard Henry Lee, were against ratification. Each party has their own beliefs on why or why not this document should or should not be passed. These beliefs are displayed in the following articles: Patrick Henry's "Virginia Should Reject the Constitution," Richard Henry Lee's "The Constitution Will Encourage Aristocracy," James Madison's "Federalist Paper No. 10," and "The Letters to Brutus." In these

From May 14th through September 17th, they considered plans and proposals for creating a stronger, more centralized system of government. On September 17, 1787, the Convention signed the Constitution and forwarded it to Congress; on September 28th, Congress sent the document on to the states, which were to organize ratification conventions. From the autumn of 1787, through the summer of 1788, sustained debates were carried on in the press--through newspapers, broadsides, and pamphlets--and in person at such venues as town meetings, coffee houses, and taverns. Both the advocates of the Constitution, known as “Federalists,” and its critics, called “Anti-Federalists” tried to persuade voters to support or reject it. The debates in New York City’s press between the Anti-Federalist “Brutus”--Robert Yales--and the Federalist “Publius”--Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison--were particularly intense, and would influence public opinion across the new nation .

This debate greatly contributed our understanding of our national government and provided for stronger protections and the addition of a bill of rights. Although the Constitution did ultimately get passed, this did not necessarily prove the Federalists right in every instance and the Anti-Federalists wrong. This is particularly is proven in the evidence of the many predictions of the Anti-Federalists that have come true and the change of opinion on several essays from "The Federalist" that the authors later changed their opinion on. The decisive reason for the Constitution's eventual ratification and the alleged failure of the Anti-Federalist can be pinpointed to several key issues, some of which are the lack of an cohesive opinion of the Anti-Federalists, the absence of a worthy alternative, and a weaker argument to be debated. This is notably portrayed in the Anti-Federalist dissention of the Constitutions clauses for the office of the President and reveals similarities to the failures they suffered in their position against Constitution as a whole.