Felony Locution Analysis

The employer is also concerned with how the crime committed relates to the job at hand.

One of the main barriers that inmates face when they are released from prison is limited cognitive skills, limited education and work experience, and substance abuse or other mental health problems. Substance abuse and other mental health problems limit employability because it limits the job readiness that is required for employment (Holzer, Raphael & Stoll, 2003). Another issue that is faced when inmates are released into society is that any skills that they did have prior to conviction has diminished greatly and they face lower pay due to their diminished or lack of skills, and the attitudes that have been developed during their time in prison deeply affects their attitude during their search for employment. Offenders also face another barrier when searching for employment. Many businesses can be held legally liable for any criminal action that their employees may cause (Holzer, Raphael & Stoll, 2003). These barriers that offenders face upon release is why solid solutions and planning must be implemented when considering the integration of ex-felons into society and preparation for reentry must begin well before the scheduled release date in order to successfully reintegrate an inmate into society and reduce the rate of recidivism.

One of the primary problems in Kentucky is the unemployment rate of people with criminal backgrounds that caused the use of 'ban the box’ by employers in all but one city in Kentucky and among many other states. Former inmates often face restrictions in different situations that may include housing, voting and employment (Hoskins, 2014). The problem does not affect only those people in Kentucky, but also other states in the United States and even in other countries. The majority of the employers show reluctance to absorb people who have criminal records. Some of the studies show that more than half of the employers will discriminate an individual due to their incarceration records (NIJ, 2013). Even in a situation that they find employment,

This poses dilemmas as for employment breaks. Another disadvantage that comes to play is the initiative filling out the form of employment (The application). On that application for employment; reads a box that states criminal history, arrests previous to applying, also asks

To evaluate the candidates’ moral character, the AOI will ask questions regarding the applicants’ criminal history. Applicants that answer “yes” to any listed criminal offenses will be required to submit a Background Statement form for each offense. They must also submit electronic fingerprints which are used to access the Federal Bureau of Investigation database and the Texas Department of Public Safety, Criminal Records Division. Based on all of this information, the board will determine if the applicant is of good moral character.

1538). If a federal law were to be enacted it should follow the guidelines that Weissert (2016) advocates. Instead of allowing employers to ask about criminal history in the interview stage the employers should have to wait until a conditional offer of employment has been made (Weissert, 2016, p. 1552). The employer should consider the nature of the crime, the time elapsed since conviction, and the positon the applicant is applying for (Weissert, 2016, p. 1552). Discriminating on the basis of criminal history increased the rates of recidivism and has a greater impact on Afircan American and Hispanic males (Weissert, 2016, p. 1531). Ban the Box might not be the solution for the issue of discriminating on the basis of an applicant’s criminal history, but it is a step in the right

assault and battery, weapons, vehicle and drug incidents, or any other incident could lead up to a

Phillip it is clear that you have a complete explanation of the back ground requirement that so many employers utilize to classify potential employees. Yet with this classification many very capable candidates are quickly eliminated for either old run in’s with the law or youthful ignorance. To this end, we as a society have alienated the youth who have fallen into the trap of conviction of a crime. Clearly it is not necessary to penalize people who have repaid their debt to society for their life making them unfit for hire. The question is what is the answer to solve this injustice that is imposed on these candidates? In my view companies could have what they call a conditional hire that would go longer for a year than a traditional 90 day

Finding a job in today's labor force is difficult for those who have been incarcerated in their past. This issue must be addressed in the near future because it affects a significant portion of society. Those affected by this disfunction in the job market are at a great disadvantage. They have a much lower likelihood of finding a job because employers see a criminal background, but do not notice any of their redeeming actions. This is a big problem for ex-felons because they are unable to be employed after their release from correctional facilities. Their inability to find a job deprives them of a constant income in which they need to support themselves. This not only affects the ex-felon but his or her family as well leading to an increase

Therefore, while in jail, the search would include people charged with simple misdemeanors and scheduled violations, which include crimes for instance, public intoxication, possession of drug paraphernalia and some traffic offenses. Although, strip searches are

For example, candidates must be able to pass a background screening and submit their fingerprints along with authorization to extensively check the candidate’s background. Felony and or misdemeanor cases may disqualify candidates depending on the extent of the charges. For example, domestic violence cases are not allowed under any circumstances. Background screening for Mississippi police officers consist of explaining traffic charges with fines exceeding $100. Applicants must also explain 4 or more consecutive traffic offenses occurring within a 2 year time span or 24 months.

In the United States more than two million people are incarcerated and seven million are under correctional supervision. There are 13 million adults that have been convicted of a felony and 47 million American have something on their record. Having a felony has attained a newfound relevance in the United States (King, 2006) . In many states begin a felon come with obstacles both informal and formal in the lives of people with a felony convicted. In the midst of the growing civil right movement, the augmented by racially disparate law enforcement and corrections policies the word “felon” is commonly linked to the African American community. Having a felony conviction limited housing, employment and educational opportunities. The barriers that of begin a felon limited the accessing to opportunities that is available to the general population (King, 2006).

This process can be viewed as a double edged sword as the applicant if given the opportunity to explain his plight, may be able to convince the employer that they are the person for the job in spite of the past record. Or, the delay in the disclosure may cost the employer in time and resources upon disclosure to seek other applicants if the applicant is disqualified for the charges. As Doleac and Hansen state regarding the inability of employers to determine up front if the applicant has a criminal history, the employer defaults to statistics which “eliminate groups that they think, on average, are more likely to have a recent conviction” (How Ban The Box Backfires,

This intent of this article is to examine the negative socioeconomic and political effects on African American men after they have a felony criminal record. I will also examine the level of equality that exists between White men and Black men in respect to their socioeconomic and political standing after they have a felony criminal record. Many sociologists, criminologists and social commentators (Pettit and Western 2004; Muller and Schrage 2014; Smith and Hattery 2010; Pager 2003; Pager 2011) have written about the effects of the Prison Industrial complex on

Yet, this united approach of law and order causes a domino effect through the communities and families creating several generational obstacles. Once convicted, served time, and paid his/her debt to society, the individual still faces a plethora of resistant. Several of your legal rights as a US citizen diminish causing a long-lasting impression. Being labeled as a convicted criminal decreases your ability to find employment to support your family, reduces the number of places available to live, and forces a stigma on your entire family. Per the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People’s 2017 Fair Chance Hiring Factsheet, “Having a record reduces the likelihood of a job callback or offer by as much as 50 percent.” (NAACP, 1) Depending on the severity of conviction, you could lose the right to vote or possess a firearm. These long-lasting