Female Anesthesiologist Case Study

she has been coerced or deceived into getting the procedure done by either being told it is a

The resident physician can be more culturally sensitive, by educating himself about LGBT community and practice justice. The resident should also become aware of his biases, learn how to respect the patient’s autonomy, and learn how control his incivility. Discrimination is not tolerated in the workplace. I believe that the resident exhibited person impediments, because he was being uncivil by name calling. Even though, the resident physician disagrees with the patient’s sex changes, it’s important to be culturally competent and try to develop a rapport rather than name calling.

In the early 1960’s privately owned hospitals in North Carolina were allowed to discriminate against race as to whether to admit a patient to the hospital and/or grant privileges to African American doctors or dentists, as long as separate-but-equal facilities were provided. Dr. Simkins, an African American dentist, attempted to admit and treat a patient experiencing an abscessed tooth, ultimately being subjected to denial of privileges.

Physicians can choose not to accept patients if their medical condition is not in the physicians’ area of expertise but a patient cannot be declined because of race, color, religion, national origin or anything else discriminatory.

Unfortunately, she was in place to protest the procedure, she needed help. Nor could her relatives do anything for her. Her many health problems needed to be looked at but the doctors do more than

Like previously stated, there has been a vast history of racial issues particularly in the medical field. These issues have led to minorities, especially African Americans, to not trust medical professionals and procedures. A study found in the Archives of Internal Medicine gives shocking results by stating that “African Americans were far less trusting than whites of the medical establishment and medical researchers in particular. African Americans were 79.2 percent more likely to believe that someone like them would be used as a guinea pig without his or her consent” (Clark 118). There are many cases in the past which would make a minority feel neglected and like a “guinea pig”. For instance, Henrietta Lacks, the main character of Rebecca Skloot’s book, was diagnosed with cervical cancer in 1951. Her doctors were shocked at the terrifying rate her tumor was growing (Skloot 117). Her cells were taken from her cervix and they were distributed world wide without her or her family’s consent. The distribution went on for years even after her death

First of all, nurses have a very critical role of advocating for their patients regardless of race, ethnicity, and gender. Today the nurse would treat the African Americans and white patients equally. Nurses are a lot more educated now then they were back in the ‘50s and there is so much more research available to them to practice evidence based care. Today’s nurse would not proceed with a procedure unless a voluntary informed consent was signed prior to any invasive procedures with potential risks. If today’s nurse was given the opportunity to treat Henrietta Lacks, this patient would have been treated with holistic therapeutic care, great pain management, care that has evidence to back it up, and the nurse would have advocated for the consent form to be signed by the patient and care clearly and thoroughly explained to the patient prior to implementing the

Between early June 1951 and Henrietta’s death on October 4, 1951, doctors involved in her treatment would continue to violate ethics code. Henrietta complained of discomfort in early June that morphed into pain. During the 1950s, segregation was still occurring in the country (Skloot, 2010, p. 63). Therefore, it was common for black patients to not question white professionals (Skloot, 2010, p. 63). It was also common practice for doctors to withhold information from patients so they would not be upset or confused by medical terms such as cancer (Skloot, 2010, p. 63). Within two months, the pain was so severe she could be heard screaming a block away from her home (Skloot, 2010, p. 65). By the time doctors examined her properly, she was inoperable and a “stony hard mass” (Skloot, 2010, p. 64) could be felt on her abdomen. The doctors during previous follow up visits wrote notes about her complaints but still stated no evidence of reoccurrence. Therefore, these unnamed doctors did not demonstrate appropriate professionalism because they neglected to perform a thorough exam required to give Henrietta a proper diagnosis breaching codes: 1.04 integrity, 1.07a exploitative relationship, 2.09 treatment/intervention

It has, however, not been stated that the patient’s consent was sought before he was admitted into the mixed sex medical ward which violates Mr Jones right to be fully involved in decisions about his care (NMC Code, 2008).

The underlying issues in both cases are racial discrimination. For Cheryl Boulden in the affirmative action case the issue is being “an African American woman among the good ol’ boys in Indiana.” She was recruited because of race and her permanent handicap was seen as an asset for a diversity program lacking any. Yet these qualities made her a target of racism. Susan Finn’s ethnic discrimination presents a dilemma of how to deal with a contract physician’s abusive behavior “toward Hispanics and female staff as well as patients” (Reeves, 2006, p. 79). While the issues of racial and gender discrimination is not unusual, the failure of these agencies to address multiple complaints is.

While today’s “patients [have] one thing going for them that Henrietta didn't: They [are] alive. And the dead have no right to privacy-even if part of them is still alive,” (Skloot 211) history’s ethical debate regarding medical racism remains a social issue. When patients experience racism, they may be unable to defend themselves if they are incapacitated by medical professionals. Due to patient negligence and bias, the health care provider’s poor treatment breaks the trust of minorities. As shown in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and treatment of Henrietta Lacks, doctors and researchers have failed to inform the participants correctly. Both occurrences highlight medical racism because of the historical maltreatment of minority groups. Now, many

With America’s growing minority population, the healthcare field needed to reflect the change. Therefore, medical schools implemented affirmative action plans in order to address this issue. However, the controversy started to rise when white college applicants began to take legal action against public universities and medical schools over the admission process. While some people suggest affirmative action enhances students learning experiences and brings diversity to the medical field, others argue that it violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause and should instead of using race as a factor, medical schools should use socioeconomic factors in the admission process. Nevertheless, while racial and socioeconomic diversity is

The title of the current event news is Hospital’ing while black: New study shows black people receive cold shoulders from doctors. In the article, author Clutch brings attention to how people of color are treated in American hospitals. A study by the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management found that doctors treat their white patients better than their black patients. Black actors were used in the study to pretend to be patients with serious medical conditions. The findings revealed that when communicating and interacting with patients, doctors showed little sympathy towards their black patients. For example, the doctors often touch, stood closer, and made eye contact with their white patients, but not with their black patients. What is more,

Based upon the rule of utilitarianism, I argue that repeated historical demonstrations of racial discriminatory practices in medicine leads us to a conclusion racially based oversight committees should presided over patients whose care has been historically documented as ethically heinous acts of racial mistreatment. In cases like the Tuskegee experiment and Drapetomania will be significant in elucidating the necessity of racial oversight.

However, the doctors and relatives deny her the liberty of choice in this life changing matter, and therefore proceed against her will. After undergoing the