Female Genital Mutilation Research Paper

In life, we all make decisions rather they are good, or bad the choices we make will have an impact on our life in the future. Beza is an eleven-year-old girl who lives in an Ethiopian village. In this village, the practice of FGM (Female Genital Mutilation) is being carried out by force on girls who are far too young to make decisions for themselves. So what exactly is Female Genital Mutilation? There are three types of genital cutting that are practiced: the clitoridectomy which requires the removal of part or the whole clitoris to be amputated and the bleeding is stopped by apply pressure or stitches, the excision which requires both the clitoris and the inner lips to be amputated and the bleeding is stopped by stitching, but the vagina

major part in a human's life, a close control over this specific aspect in a

This assignment will identify and discuss the vulnerable group who is subjected to female genital mutilation (FGM) and consider what part practice nurses have in safeguarding girls and women from FGM and evaluating their role of nurse including barriers they face in safeguarding individuals including lack of education and being too culturally sensitive and whether their safeguarding individuals from FGM is effective. This assignment will then discuss Bolton NHS (2015) Safeguarding Adults at Risk policy and how to apply it as a qualified nurse and how it can influence registered nurse’s future safeguarding practices. Lastly, I will reflect on my learning from the safeguarding vulnerable group module and how it can influence my future safeguarding practice.

Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), also known as female genital cutting (FGC) and female circumcision, is the removal of part or the entire external female genitalia or any injury to the female genital organ with no medical reasoning. The practice of circumcision is entrenched in gender inequality and efforts to control women’s sexuality. It is believed to bring about honor, purity, and cleanliness; however, FGM/FGC is recognized internationally as a violation of the human rights of girls and women. It reflects deep-rooted inequality between the sexes, and constitutes an extreme form of discrimination against women. It is nearly always carried out on minors and is a violation of rights of children. The practice also violates a woman’s right to

This research is limited only to the ethical issues of Female Genital Mutilation(FGM). Ethical issues about other kinds/types of mutilation like the tattoos or markings, surgeries, transplants and piercings are not furthermore discussed, explained, and identified in this research.

The practice of female circumcision is happening in areas across the globe such as Africa, Asia and the Middle East. The United states and Serval others counties look at this as a vicious act of genital mutilation and an outright human rights violation (Clay, 2017, p.g.22). The practice of female circumcision has gone on for years as a cultural rite of passage in some countries. Other countries see it as a religious belief and others see it as a way to make their daughter more desirable for a husband The author reports that even through in the United States that many women more than half a million are still at risk of having their genital cut from the CDC reports in 2012 (Clay, 2017,

Now that we know little about the mutilation process these females undergoes; let’s ask ourselves “Why would someone ever agree to conduct such procedure on their own will?” If mutilation emphasizes the clear violation of human rights, why is this procedure being implemented in many different countries? Well, this issue is due to different ethical, and moral perspective; one may believe that female mutilation is morally right; while others may think it’s a violation of human rights. Let’s first explore the ethical theories on this

The subject of FGM (Female Genital Mutilation) reminds me of the severity of FGM as well as its ties with culture and religion in Ethiopia - my country of origin. The issue personally affects me because it stirs up very unpleasant memories and thoughts. I remembered my oldest female cousins and neighbors going through this kind of practice twenty years ago. I even remember the women who executed the procedure. Like many of the people who carry out female circumcision, this woman was not medically trained to perform the procedure, nor did she use proper medical equipments and anesthesia. The majority of the people who support female circumcision use their religious and cultural values to explain their support for FGM. However, FGM is a brutal practice that exposes women to extreme pain and possible risk

In the article “No to Female Genital Mutilation” by Roland Angerer, “One such belief is that a girl’s sexuality needs to be controlled. This demonstrates the underlying gender injustice of the practice: girls and women are not autonomous, someone else has to control them – mostly fathers and husbands.” This suggests that they believe the opinions of girls and women are not considered, and they are believed to have no control over themselves. According to the CNN video ‘FGM Survivor: Fundamentally, it is ‘child abuse’’, “They do not even scream, because if they do, their age mates in school will despise them.” This shows that they are forced to keep this unbearable pain they are feeling to themselves. They must not show that they are scared about this process and they should be able to show how strong they are by keeping the pain to themselves. Although there are more social and cultural reasons to justify FGM, two of those have been

The author of this article is Nigeen Akram. She was a volunteer who wanted to go to Iraq and study what was going on with Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). She interviewed a girl named Payam. She was a victim of FGM. All her life she wondered why her mother and grandmother did this to her. Her experience alone was terrifying not to mention the main procedure. This can give people insight on what is happening with females today. FGM is still around and many people still do it.

Consent, in its various forms and states in certain contexts, forms a crucial part of legality and illegality, in that its existence strongly categorises the nature of an act (Tuckness 2012). If consent were established, it would be easy for the layman to conclude that an act should not be intervened with by the state. Per contra, the complexities surrounding an act go beyond these simple distinctions. The issue of intervention can to some degree be seen as problematic in its fundamental aim to represent and advocate for a particular ‘victim’, in spite of the circumstances of the situation, which tend to run parallel with a different narrative (Alcoff, 1992; Seth, 2001). This essay will examine the relationship between the state and female

Female Genital Mutilation FGM is rising despite intervention that are in place. It is important to know how whether or not is enough being done to protect women and young girls from FGM in a borough where incidents of FGM are high.

Activists in the past speculated that the prevalence of the procedure flourished from Islamic culture, but according to broad spectrum data collected by a variety of global organizations, it is widely accepted that both Muslims and Christians equally celebrate the custom. Female genital mutilation no longer contains itself to Africa, but with immigrant populations spreading the globe, all nations now face this issue within their borders. In an article published by the United Nations, the World Health Organization recognizes 28 countries in Africa alone still participating in female cutting despite international treaties and the 2008 Egyptian Ministry’s ban to abolish the operation on underage females (“Eliminating FGM” 4). The World Health Organization also estimates that between 100 and 140 million females globally have been subject to female genital mutilation, and 3 million girls are at risk to undergo the procedure this year alone (“Eliminating FGM” 1). These statistics are shocking, but even more devastating is that fact that statistics do not account for how many girls die each year from cutting due to the underground nature of the

Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is the summarized name given to multiple procedures that involve partial or total removal of the female genitalia, or other injuries to the female genitals for non-medical reasons. The act of FGM is carried out for traditional purposes only. Women and young girls are both subjected to this act of brutality. This paper will take a more in depth look at FGM and the psychological repercussions, the cultural differences, and the violation of human rights that are all associated with it.

Imagine this! Being either a young girl or a woman forcefully bound against your will while elders perform a procedure called Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). The young girls and women who are forced to have this procedure done not only loses their rights to sexual pleasure but their rights are sliced, chopped, punctured, and finally burnt away. Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) otherwise known as Female Genital Circumcision (FGC) is also a controversial topic in Western societies. This paper will examine the history of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), hegemonic perspective on Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), health consequences of having this procedure done, how Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) affects women’s sexual function, and women who