Female Representation For Female Guilty Parties

The United States criminal justice system, an outwardly fair organization of integrity and justice, is a perfect example of a seemingly equal situation, which turns out to be anything but for women. The policies imposed in the criminal justice system affect men and women in extremely dissimilar manners. I plan to examine how gender intersects with the understanding of crime and the criminal justice system. Gender plays a significant role in understanding who commits what types of crimes, why they do so, who is most often victimized, and how the criminal justice system responds to these victims and offenders. In order to understand the current state of women and the way in which gender relates to crime and criminal justice, it is first

However, the validity of the chivalry thesis is questioned by Box (1981) who reviewed the data from self-report studies in the UK and USA. He concluded that ‘the weight of evidence on women committing serious offences does not give clear support to the view that they receive differential and more favourable treatment’. This claim is supported by Graham and Bowling study which found that females were less likely than men to be involved in the more serious offences. The seriousness of the offence could explain the lower proportions of females among the convicted and cautioned than among self-reported offenders rather than leniency in the criminal justice system.

1. Describe women’s involvement in property crimes. Greater involvement in minor property crimes like fraud and embezzlement due to their economic marginalization or feminization of property.

38). Furthermore, they claimed that female criminals were “monsters” (as cited in DeKeseredy, 2009, p. 38). These false images painted all female offenders with the same brush and served to dehumanize their characters. Furthermore, these theories negatively impacted the media and the public’s conception of female offenders. As a result female offenders were treated poorly, to say the least. To make matters worse, research in this area was conducted by males, dedicated for males, and served only to benefit males. For example, theoretical authors of this era were men who studied characteristics of males with respect to criminality. Women were thrown into the mixture of the alleged gender-neutral research, when what they needed was gender-sensitive studies. Even though these early theories inspired more accurate research, they served as a double edge sword to the female offender profiles.

Women have been commonly stereotyped as loving, nurturing and compassionate people. Female offenses, over the past century, have been on the rise (Wormer, 2010). The battle for gender equality might play an important role in this phenomenon. Female offenders started to increase in numbers during the 1980s, as reported by the Uniformed Crime Report (UCR). However, the majority of offenses committed by females are not violent offenses (Wormer, 2010). As shown in the UCR, the percentage of females imprisoned for violent offenses have been declining over the past two decades (United States Department of Justice, 2010). When looking at crimes committed by women, compared to those committed by men, they are obviously smaller in numbers. The

Cassidy M. Kesler, a current student at Yale Law School, studied the demographic differences between male and female offenders sentenced in the federal system. Some of Kesler’s findings confirm and add to the results of earlier studies. She found that female offenders are more likely than male offenders to commit non-violent crimes. Non-violent crimes are less likely to receive harsh punishments or imprisonment (Kesler, 2003). Kesler also found that women go to trial less frequently than men and are more likely to be assigned a lower criminal history record, compared to

In the criminal justice system, studies found that women, on average, are 15% less likely, than men with similar offenses, to be imprisoned (Barkan 360). This is a concerning amount of men over women being punished and causes hot debate over the intentions of the legal justice system.

With regards to female sentences, it can be seen on the one hand that the criminal justice system deals with female crimes more leniently than with male criminality, as referred to as the chivalry theory (Pollok, 1983). As many female offences are usually petty wrongdoings, such as shoplifting which makes up for nearly a half of all indictable convictions (Ministry of Justice, 2014), due to their gender, it is most likely that females are to be cautioned over receiving a prison sentence. However, this was not the case for Maxine Carr in 2003. A whirlwind of media interest surrounding Carr’s involvement, with the murders of two young girls from Soham, is argued to be the definitive reason as to why Carr received a prison sentence of three years, all for perverting the course of justice.

To begin, there are numerous differences that can be cited between female offending and male offending. Generally, studies show that women tend to engage in crime less often than their male counterparts. It is shown that men are more predisposed to committing a crime than women (Coid, Petruckevitch,

Kruttschnitt confronts offending behavior and general trends in feminist criminology by exploring how criminological theories apply to both genders. She addresses the problem of generalizability, as well as asserting that in order for the field to advance, more needs to be done than disregarding old theories, or simply pointing out the differences between offending behaviors in both genders. She argues that to further understand offending behaviors and make theories more gender inclusive steps need to be taken in order to

“The factors that the female’s burglars regarded as leading them to commit their crimes differentiated the partners clearly from the accomplices” (Decker et al. 1993). Females are the ones that tend to steal more then males. For example, majority of the boosters are females. A booster is a person that will steal large quantity of clothes, or valuable items and steal it for an affordable price. Boosters may even take orders for people. They promote their business on social media and that is where they get recognized from. Some times there work solo but they might also have friends, because they would not prefer to walk in the store frequency due to cameras and looking suspicious. “For the females who worked as partners, burglaries could involve a variety of tasks” (Decker et al. 1993). Even though, females are better burglaries then males, lets not forget that sometime they might work in partnerships. When it comes to scamming money, a male will tend to scam with there girl friends or a female that is trust worthy. But, the female will not get recognized for scamming the male will take the credit. So imagine what else that females do that they are not getting recognized for. It is not frequent to hear about female are drug goddesses but in Central and South America, it is common for a female to smuggle and sell drugs. “Anderson (2005)

Many of the offenses in this Documentary relates with the common crimes that have been mentioned in class. In lecture, we have learned that most all crimes committed by females are less serious non-violent crimes (Pinchevsky, 2017). The crimes that women typically do are things like larceny theft, drug crimes, assaults, etc. The crimes that these girls in the documentary are accurate with the material that we learned in class about offending. All of the crimes that are committed are part of the top 10 list of offenses that females are most likely to get arrested for.

Adler, estimates the rate of males being arrested is higher to females. At a rate of three males to one female offender. Historically, females arrest has always been lower, compared to males. Statistically, the rise of female arrests has increased throughout the year. As more arrests are affected upon female offenders, the number of male arrest are still increasingly higher. Statistically proving that males contribute to the majority of criminal behavior, acts, and offense.

Gender and Crime Integrative Essay The data that I and my group members had gathered information pertaining to gender and crime and the common factor that we had found was that, most studies revolved around generalized gender binaries and external factors, such as society and culture, which contribute and or compel someone to be involved or commit crime. Despite having different sub-topic concentrations and different sources, our group’s information does intersect and there are similarities, but overall our combined research data does have a correlating general idea. The most important concepts pertaining to gender and crime and the research we all did, was that there is a correlation between a person’s age, sex, and ethnicity, that contribute

She said that men do commit as much shoplifting as females and also that women don't hide menstruation. She also stated that there is no evidence for poisoning and that it is a stupid idea to even think that a majority of women do that to their relatives. Another excuse of under participation of women in the crime statistics is that the criminal justice system is chivalrous, therefore favourable to women because they need to be protected. She also found that females are treated harshly if they deviate from socially expectable sexuality. Young girls who are seen as sexual promiscuous are taken onto care but if boys are seen like that it is perfectly fine.