Female Sex Offenders: Perception is Not Reality

1640 WordsJul 9, 20187 Pages
Perception is not reality. The common assumption that the court system often treats female sex offenders differently than male sex offenders, the punishments of female sex offenders are more lenient than men who commit the same types of crimes, and the differences between male and female victims are all perception and not reality. Objective considerations to additional factors make the perceptions baseless. These additional factors solidify the factual differences between male and female sex offenders. The acceptance that the court system often treats female offenders differently than male offenders is an accurate statement; however, it comes with many caveats. Generally, the public views women as nurturers, motherly and incapable of…show more content…
More specifically, 50% of males and 83% of females received sentences between 1 and 4 years. In terms of the lengthier sentences, 10 years or more, 27% of males and only 5% of females received such sentences. The remaining 22% of males and 12% of females received sentences between 5 and 9 years (pg. 159-160). Additional research by Embry & Lyons (2012) supports the differences in sentencing only: A significant difference in the means for sentence length exists between men and women for the offenses rape, child sexual assault, and forcible sodomy. In each of these offense categories, men are, on average, sentenced to longer, or harsher, prison terms. It is interesting to note here, too, that the offense that had the most even ratio of men to women and the largest number of offenders, sexual assault, showed no significant differences in sentence length between men and women…Rape, as it typically manifests itself in a violent manner, would demonstrate the most egregious break in gender roles. However, the data suggest men receive harsher penalties, evidenced by a higher mean sentence length. In addition,
Open Document