Fermi Paradox Essay

Quantum Mechanics is the science of subatomic particles and their behavior patterns that are observed in nature. As the foundation of scientific knowledge approached the start of the twentieth century, problems began to arise over the fact that classic physical ideas were not capable of explaining the observed behavior of subatomic particles. In 1913, the Danish physicist Neils Bohr, proposed a successful quantum model of the atom that began the process of a more defined understanding of its subatomic particles. It was accepted in the early part of the twentieth century that light traveled as both waves and particles. The reason light appears to act as a wave and particle is because we are noticing the

The Drake Equation was devised in 1961 by Dr Frank Drake while employed at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory in Green Bank, West Virginia (SETIWeb 2). It is designed to estimate the number of civilisations in the Milky Way that are capable of reaching out and communicating, therefore giving us an idea of the probability of finding intelligent life within our home galaxy. It consists of multiple variables, each carefully considering a factor that may play a role in the existence and development of extra-terrestrial life. Unfortunately, all variables are estimated, as we don’t have exact numbers to use. However, they are our best estimates and should result in a reasonably accurate answer. The equation is as follows:

The alien's have not meddled with the destruction of a civilization in millions of years, but they found they could not allow the complex human being to become extinct. However, because humans are intelligent to a fault without actively questioning authority and have a tendency to be

Meno 's paradox is a very prevalent paradox in the area of philosophy. It arises during a conversation between Socrates and Meno in the book Five Dialogues. Meno and Socrates are speaking about what virtue is when Meno raises an interesting point, “How will you look for it, Socrates, when you do not know at all what it is? How will you aim to search for something you do not know at all? If you should meet with it, how will you know that this is the thing that you did not know?” (p. 70). In simple terms, Meno is asking Socrates how he will

This is the beginning of the end of confusion of a paradox. All, except the somber shellfish-allergenic people, can appreciate the wittiest paradox found twenty thousand leagues under the sea: the magnificent jumbo shrimp. This peculiar crustacean is one of the many forms of puzzling contradictions. There is an endless amount of self-contradicting, seemingly impossible, yet truthful statements around the world, and it is our job to justify and rationalize these arguments. Paradox is important to the development of logical systems. Without paradox, any surprise of a counter- intuitive claim or proposition would seem over our heads and forever impossible, without a solution. It is left to the brilliant minds of philosophers, artists, writers, poets, engineers, mathematicians, and countless others to challenge our cerebrum. It is the majestically roaring, frozen conundrum of M.C. Escher’s “Waterfall” that contains an incongruity which, when followed, flows in the same path up the steps and down the balcony again and again. The puzzling result of this is not really a contradiction, but a valid deduction of acceptable premises.

James Green discusses in his speech the possibility of there being life beyond earth. Green starts off with a quote that is used in a lot of movies, books and television shows, “Is there life beyond earth in our solar system?” He follows this initial quote with one by Carl Sagan, an American astronomer, “It takes extraordinary evidence for extraordinary claims.” It is important for Green to use these two quotes as attention getters. He hooks the listener with his works and we begin to think if there really is life in our solar system then just on earth.

Maybe this tiny blue planet is the only place in this whole big, complicated universe where sentient beings thrive. Instead of extremely advanced alien civilizations, there could be something else called “The Great Filter”. The Great Filter is like a barrier that is very unlikely or even impossible for life to pass through. One probability is that we have already surpassed the Great Filter, making us one of the only if not the only lifeforms who’ve reached this level of intelligence. There are many instances on when this could have happened, such as when prokaryotes became eukaryotes, when humans evolved from chimps, etc (Urban). We haven’t figured out exactly the process behind how life starts and the conditions required to make it could actually be more complicated than what we’d expect. Maybe the universe was more hostile in the past and has only recently ‘cooled down’, paving way for complex lifeforms like us to exist. That would make us exceptionally rare and unique, which means that we could be one of the only or even the only civilization in the universe. Or perhaps, we’re in deep trouble and the Great Filter is still looming ahead of us. That would be suggesting that it’s common for life to reach where we are right now, but that Great Filter is preventing life from going further in almost all cases. Many other civilizations have reached our point of advancement but collapsed due to that Great Filter, and it’s unlikely that we’re going to be an exception to that inevitable doom

Among the billions of stars in each galaxy, many have planets that revolve around them. At least a few are bound to be of the right size and have the correct spatial orientation with respect to their star to allow life to grow. We believe this because life exists on the Earth. Astronomers have concluded that there must be hundreds of billions of other stars with conditions approximating those of the sun. Therefore there could be a million earth like planets with advanced civilizations in the Milky Way galaxy alone (Stilley). It is very probable that there is intelligent life elsewhere in the universe.

Is there life in the vast universe? Can they communicate with us? These questions have been around for decades. But, lately numerous articles have been appeared in the media at an explosive rate. As it can be expected, not all the articles are credible, moreover a portion of them uses fallacies to attract the reader’s attention and to create inadequate controversy. As an example, Joel Achenbach in his article of February, 28, 2015, published on the Washington Post with the title of “Do we really want to know if we’re not alone in the universe?” exposed logic fallacies as his writing denotes that aliens are aware of us because of the radio transmission that the humanity have been broadcasting since TV and radio existed (Par. 6), interstellar

Let’s think, if someone told me that there would be a surprise for me this upcoming week, my mind would automatically start thinking of when and try to figure out the day and time. I would assume one thing, if the surprise does not happen by Thursday, then it should certainly happen on Friday. However, in the Unexpected Hanging, also Known as the Surprise Examination Paradox, the theory address the fact that If Friday is the day I received my surprise then, it is not really a surprise. And that due to the fact that all the other days were exhausted and the only day left was Friday, I should not be surprised. Which means Friday is not the day to expect a surprise for my surprise day.

One of many solutions to fermis paradox is the zoo scenario. The zoo hypothesis looks as to the assumed behavior and existence of extraterrestrial life and the reasons they stop from coming to Earth and is one of many good explanations for the fermi paradox. The hypothesis is that alien life avoids communication with Earth, and one of its main reasons is that it does so to allow for natural evolution and cultural development, avoiding contamination. The hypothesis seeks to explain the apparent absence of extraterrestrial life despite its accepted possibility and the reasonable expectation of its existence. Aliens might choose to allow contact once the human species has passed certain technological, political, or ethical standards. They might withhold contact until humans force contact upon them, possibly by sending a spacecraft to planets they inhabit.

Before discussing the idea of paradoxes, I will first describe what a paradox is. A paradox, strictly speaking, is when a theory with logical premises leads to the creation of two logical, but contradictory, conclusion. This definition of paradox works, but is very limited in scope of what we can classify as a paradox. Thus modifying the definition of a paradox to mean an argument that leads to wildly different conclusion… . Using this understanding of paradox, I will give a famous example of a paradox thought up by the Greek philosopher Zeno.

Astronomers believed the Universe was created about 14 billion years ago. During that time, the entire Universe was inside a bubble that was thousands of times smaller than a pinhead, and it was insanely hot and dense. Out of nowhere this little bubble started expanding. This expansion created what we know as the Universe. In such little time the Universe went from the size of an atom to the ginormous galaxy we have that is continuously growing.

Nikola Tesla is regarded as one of the most brilliant inventors in history. His work provided the basis for the modern alternating current power system, as well as having developed both radio and the fluorescent light bulb. He worked with Thomas Edison and George Westinghouse, among others. He was also widely misunderstood by his peers and the public at large.

Based on the experimentation performed by physicists Alejandro Jenkins and Gilad Perez, there are four fundamental forces that enable life within our universe, without which humans would not exist. They consist of the strong nuclear force, electromagnetic force, gravity, and weak nuclear force. Because the other three forces are so vital to the existence of life, the two decided to eliminate the weak nuclear force and study the resulting possibilities via simulations and graphical reasoning. Their experiment created graphs showing two variables, one per axis. They showed that there is a “small range [within each variable that is] congenial to life” (Jenkins and Perez), and by combining two variables, the range supporting life increases. This means that if other universes do exist in an infinite quantity, as this theory asserts, the probability that intelligent life exists within them is high. Though not all possess conditions that support organic molecules