Fetal Tissue Research Paper

Every child born in America is unique: whether it be because of skin color, hair color, birth weight, complications while still in the womb, or difficulties at birth. Yet when it comes to vaccinations they are all treated equal and are expected to follow the government recommended vaccination schedule. Once these vaccinations have been given, they cannot be removed from a child’s body. The harm they may have caused a child, cannot be reversed. Parents need to be aware of what is in these vaccines and the possible harmful effects they can have on their child. While the official cause of autism has not been clearly determined, parents of young children and expecting parents need to be aware that research shows a definite link between

When society thinks about starfish, perch, chordate, and fetal pig they become extremely curious about how their bodies operate because of how they are made up. I will give a brief synopsis of all animals before going into major detail about them. According to the online website named dictionary.com, Starfish are any echinoderm of the class Asteroidea, having the body radially arranged, usually in the form of a star, with five or more rays or arms radiating from a central disk; asteroid (dictionary.com). It is known that a chordate is an animal belonging to the phylum Chordata, composed of true vertebrates and animals having a notochord (dictionary.com). According to research, a fetal pig is an animal in the phylum Chordata and class Mammalia (dictionary.com). A perch is known to be a certain kind of fish with very spiny fins (dictionary). Starfish, perch, chordate, and fetal pig are some very interesting animals that possess some exclusive qualities both similar and different.

Vaccines are designed to put foreign antigens into the body so the body will produce antibodies to fight it off. When an antigen is

Vaccine are a common topic in todays society, they are used in the medical field everyday and most people have had vaccines. Vaccines are used to prevent specific illnesses that the immune system might not be able to handle if not vaccinated. Most people assume that they are safe, and that they should be used by everyone, but is that really the case? There currently exists a debate over the safety of vaccines, and the possible dangers that they might pose. The debate consists of two sides, the Pro-Vaccine group, and the Anti-Vaccine group. The Pro-Vaccine group believes that vaccines are a good thing, and that we should use them. The Anti-Vaccine group believes that vaccines are a bad thing, and that we should not use them. Each group has their fair share of good points. In the standpoint of who’s winning that could go to the Pro-Vaccine group, they currently have more support in society and most people believe that vaccines are safe. But number do not always mean something is right, the Anti-Vaccine group can not be discredited just because they have less support. The Anti-Vaccine group has their fair share of valid points on the issue. The middle ground in-between these two sides is pretty clear, the option to opt-out of vaccines that might be mandatory, while would be a big win for the Anti-Vaccine group it still has yet to happen. The best solution would be to make vaccines mandatory in a way

Thesis Statement: Today, the choice on whether to vaccinate children or not is a thriving topic that many parents are starting to look deeper into. Ultimately, the sole purpose of vaccinations are to promote immunity. When parents decide not to vaccinate they are not only putting their child at risk for contracting diseases, but other children as well. Claim: When parents decide not to vaccinate they are not only putting their child at risk for contracting diseases, but other children as well.

One of the most important decisions you can make for your child is whether or not to have them vaccinated. Not giving your child immunity to lethal infections based on personal or religious beliefs you have can endanger your child and many others. Recently, outbreaks of measles have occurred that have caused people to question what the role of the government is in this health issue (CDC, 2016). The utilitarian approach is one that focuses on the net good created by a choice and uses that good to justify it as ethical (Sheng, 1991). There are two sides of this debate, the “pro-mandate” and the “pro-choice” and both will be discussed. I will argue using the pro-mandate utilitarian approach that all children, without medical exemption, should

In the New York Times article, “Children Die Because People Are Wrongly Afraid of Vaccines” (NY Times 8/20/2015), the Editorial Board asserts that the world-wide resistance to immunizations for children has created a culture of so-called “vaccine hesitancy”, and that this culture is responsible for the deaths of 1.5 million children annually for lack of immunization. The authors demonstrate the immediacy of the crisis by displaying factual evidence concerning the amount of at-risk children every year, the precautions taken by both guardians and Taliban gunmen to prevent immunization, and the difficulty of changing the minds of those whose opinions are fueled by “local myths… dangerous indifference… and religious [and] philosophical objections”.

the question posed by gastroenterologist and medical researcher Andrew Wakefield and is now used as a counter-argument by those who oppose vaccination. Autism is, “A developmental brain disorder known to impair social interactions and communication,” [28]. Andrew Wakefield originally proposed a link between the measles vaccine and autism in a study he conducted and published in 1997 in the Lancet, and as a result many were led to believe the so. Actress Jenny McCarthy believed strongly that vaccines were responsible for her son's autism, “the soul left his eyes” [11]. and many have pointed out that after the wide spread of vaccines the number of autism diagnoses has

“Prevention is better than cure.” This common statement could not relate any better than it does with the controversy surrounding the morality, effectiveness, and safety of childhood immunizations. The major argument is whether or not laws should be established to declare vaccination mandatory for all children. “The US food and Drug administration (FDA) regulates all vaccines to ensure safety and effectiveness,” (ProCon.org, 2012) therefor there should not be any reason to risk the health of any child. Vaccinating our children not only ensures their safety but also that of their future to come.

Vaccines save thousands of lives each year and provide health for the general population. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “The CDC estimates that vaccinations will prevent more than 21 million hospitalizations and 732,000 deaths among children born in the last 20 years (“Report Shows 20-Year”). Nearly 22 million people will not endure meaningless suffering due to a preventable infection since they got a vaccine. Another benefit of vaccinations is that the “herd” will be protected. The herd is all the people that cannot be vaccinated, such as babies and very young children, those going through chemotherapy, and the immune compromised. By purposely not having children vaccinated, the people contained in the herd are endangered. If someone who is not vaccinated contracts a preventable disease, everyone who is in the herd is at high risk for also contracting the disease and dying because their immune systems cannot fight the disease. Vaccines can also save unborn babies from birth defects and diseases. According to the March of Dimes Foundation, if a pregnant women contracts rubella, her unborn baby is at risk for “heart defects, vision problems, and hearing problems” as well as “miscarriage, stillbirth, [or] premature birth” (March of Dimes Foundation). It is clear that getting the vaccination would be better than contracting the infection for both mother and child. By not passing these infections onto children, it becomes more likely that the infections can be eliminated from the

Miller, who wrote an article in the Vaccine Safety Manual for Concerned Families and Health Practitioners, that the MMR vaccine was cultured from an unborn aborted fetus. You may ask yourself, why or how did they get a culture from a fetus, well it actually is better explained like this. ABC news reported that Merck, who was actually the vaccine's manufacturer, did admit to or acknowledged that those cells and tissues that were originally collected, were from an electively aborted fetus (ABC news). They used the tissue to start a cell line, which is a cell multiplied over and over again to produce cells that are of a consistent genetic makeup (ABC news). The WI-38 cell line is used as a culture to grow live viruses that are used in vaccines. Also, there was a salt solution used while creating a medium (Think

Throughout history, it has been shown that vaccines make a significant impact on the health of our communities and “administration of these vaccines led to dramatic reduction in the number of cases of, as well as deaths from smallpox, polio, diphtheria, pertussis, measles, mumps and preventable diseases” (Jacobson, 2012, p.36). Generally, those involved in campaigns for and research in these preventable diseases attribute vaccines for children as the main contributing factor to the overall decline in diseases such as measles, mumps, smallpox and pertussis (Jacobson, 2012). In the public health setting, there are many issues that threaten the health and safety of the public, not just in the local community but the nation and world-wide. One such issue, surfacing in public health, is the issue of vaccinations; those who choose to vaccinate, those who choose not to vaccinate and those who do not

It can be seen from a scientific database that 26 percent of students in today’s society are not receiving vital vaccines that can furthermore, protect the school community. It is crucial for the youth to take these vaccines because it furthermore pushes the eradication of whopping cough, measles, chicken pox and poliomyelitis. Immunity against these diseases helps the future generation stop suffering the immense pain and suffrage that our ancestors endured before immunisation against these diseases where discovered and distributed. The consequence to the health of a community in regards to not choosing to immunise their children will put other children, adults in danger of contracting the possible mutated gene strand of the disease (nhs.uk, 2014). As a basic human right it is considered that individuals in the community have chosen not to immunise themselves in either moral

PGS is the most common type of testing associated with embryo biopsy. Each normal embryo contains 46 chromosomes, with 23 contributed by the sperm and 23 by the egg. In this test, geneticists are checking to be sure that the embryo has 46 normal chromosomes, which means it is a normal, or euploid, embryo. If there are fewer than or more than 46, the embryo is abnormal, or aneuploid.

No longer do families lose most or all of their children in a span of a few weeks from one disease. Rather, in America and worldwide the disease rates for one such deadly disease, smallpox, has been virtually eliminated (UNICEF). Other common illnesses with a high propensity to kill have been significantly reduced, many by over 50% by modern vaccines. Many vaccines have been created within the last 50 years. Their efficacy and offered protection to a population relies on a scientific theory called herd immunity, which has demonstrated a high level of efficacy for eradicating and significantly reducing rates of lethal illnesses (Vaccines.gov). The protection of a community from infectious disease through herd immunity can be achieved by eliminating the “personal beliefs” exemption, removing fears of parents by shedding light on the false claims of the anti-vaccine movement and the introduction of the transdermal administration route which offers more effective immunity with cheaper and painless