Feudal Europe Vs Feudal Japanese Essay

Samurai and knights were both warriors that thrived during the middle ages. Samurai were Japanese warriors, while knights came from Europe. Samurai started off as tax collectors for Japan. But when the outside world became dangerous and no one was safe, they needed to protect their land and country. Knights, on the other hand, started off by managing and protecting villages. As bandits became more popular in attacking villages the knights started to fight off the bandits. Despite these similarities, samurai and knights were diverse. Samurai and knights’ differences include their training, armor, and views of death.

Both the samurai and knights belonged and worked for their lord for their whole lives and were completely devoted to them. Furthermore, the samurai and knights were similar because they both had a lord but they also had similar training. Both samurai and knights started training young, and started training with things like poetry and religious training (Document C). They learned to have loyalty and devotion to their lord and respect their religion.

The similarities between samurais and knights were greater than the differences due to the similarity in the hierarchy and the armor they used to protect themselves. The Samurai were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment.” They made up about 10% of Japan’s population. Similarly, knights were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the lord for land.” (Document A) There were about 12,000 knights in England and Normandy, France in the 12th century. Even though Japan and Europe had no communication or access to each other, both areas placed the warrior classes in the middle of the hierarchy and owed loyalty/military services. This shows that the social order of both Feudal Japan and Feudal

Samurais and knights are different in many ways, but they are also very similar in some ways as well. First of all, training. Samurais and knights both start training during childhood, and they both used artificial swords. The samurai, however train differently in some ways by learning poetry and Kendo as well! At the age of 14, the training samurais would officially become a samurai in a ceremony called Genpuku. Knights would usually become a squire at the age of 14 with all the knowledge on how to ride a horse. Both samurai and knights showed loyalty to their master. According to Document A, it says,”School was a unique combination of physical training, poetry, and spiritual discipline.” You can see that the samurai training was alike in many ways but also different in ways compared to the knight training.

A knight in Feudal Europe were warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the lord for in return, land. A samurai in Feudal Japan were warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for either regular payment or land. While knights and samurais have many similarites, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in weapons& armor, code , and training.

The first reason why the knights and the samurai are more different than alike is because of their code of honor. Document E states that there are two different codes of honor. The code of honor of the samurai was called Bushido. In Bushido, samurai are loyal to their family and to friends. They devote themselves to helping others. In chivalry, knights were to be helpful to ladies. They always had to be loyal to the king. People may think that just because they both have codes of honor and they are loyal to others means they are the

Samurai and knights were more different than similar, and this can be shown by looking at three areas:samurai are bound to their job, the two fight in different types of warfare, and there were two genders of samurai.

The first reason why the differences are greater than the similarities is because of the social order in feudal Japan and Europe. ”Historians and other scholars use social pyramids to show how societies were structured” (Document A). The samurai owned loyalty and military service to daimyo 's for land or regular payment while on the other hand knights owned loyalty and military service to the lords. Another difference about samurais and knights was the population. Samurai with families took about 10% of Japan 's population and in Europe, there was estimated 12,000 knights in England and Normany France in the 12th century. One more difference is that there are four people above the knight in the social order but only three for samurai.

According to documents and history , around 1,000 years ago there were two different societies, in two different parts of the world that had warriors with differences. During these times, there was an emperor and a king ruling their empire/kingdom. They both had warriors they would send out into the felids. These warriors were from Japan and Europe. Japan warriors were called samurai (class warriors in feudal Japan who pledged loyalty to a noble in return for land) and Europe warriors were called knights(a noble warrior who fought on horseback in the Middle Ages). Samurai and Knight are more different than similar in three broad areas, training,armor. and their view of death.

Europe and Japan were similar in the ways of their monarchal government, which means that they were ruled by one person such as a king or queen. Both of their rulers were

Samurai and knights are not identical, they do have a good amount of differences. For instance, after going through training, samurai were awarded their title and responsibilities at the age of fourteen while knights took on their full responsibilities at twenty-one. Document B points out that although loyalty was important to both Japanese and European warriors, “loyalty towards the feudal lord in Japan was hereditary” but it was not in Europe. This means that in Japan “service of a feudal lord went from father to son” so the relationship between the lord and his warrior lasted for generations. Along with that, although both groups wore full body armor, Document D states that “a knight’s armor could weigh forty

Throughout History, there have been many different groups or events that are still widely known today. Groups of people such as the Indians or Vikings are popular groups which are referenced constantly in today’s society. However, none of these groups is more known or referenced than the Japanese Samurai. Originating in 646 AD, these Japanese warriors developed from a loose organization of farmers to the dominant social class in Feudal Japan. Along with their dominant military and political standing, the samurai brought with them a unique code or moral belief that became the core of Samurai culture. Because of this, the Samurai and their principles still affect modern day Japanese society with social customs today

There are many similarities and differences when comparing Medieval Europe and Medieval Japan. To begin one similarity is the feudal structure that Medieval Europe and Medieval Japan both had in their civilization. For example, the shape was still the same as a pyramid and the emperor also known as the king was still at the top with the peasants at the bottom. In both civilizations the knights or warriors ride horses into battle with their armor and swords. Medieval Europe and Medieval Japan also had differences such as how their religion was different.

Each strove to maintain a centralized government. For Japan the leader was to be called an emperor or empress who could only be a part of the royal family if they were related to the Shinto sun goddess. As for Europe, the leader was to be called a king or a queen. Like Japan, not just anybody could become royalty. Kings and queens came from a long descent of an Imperial family. Tradition was that the first born son of the king would become the next ruler following the kings death. However, if no legitimate son were born then the daughter would become queen. In Europe, the royal family and institution was usually

The European and Japanese Feudalism shared a ruler.Both cultures had a king and queen at the top of the class system. The king and queen were the most wealthy in their country. In European feudalism had political control. The king and queen usually lived in a castle.One the other hand, Emperor and Empress in Japan is very similar to the king and