Field Research : The 16 Personalities Test

Dispositional personality theories are quite different from biological personality theories. The two will be compared and dissected in this article. The Big Five Personality Test will also be analyzed and how it is used to study personality will be examined.

A person’s personality says much about who he or she is. People define personality in different ways. Researcher after researcher has tried to come up with the best definition for what personality truly means. Case studies, correlational studies, and experimental designs are some of the most commonly used methods of research. These methods help better define personality. The advantages and disadvantages of each method differ and can be helpful or hurtful to the research of an individual’s personality.

Assessment techniques and the techniques used are a part of every counselor’s career. It is important that all counselors are aware of the different assessment procedures available as well as the risks and benefits associated with them. I chose to assess the case of Jessica, a medical resident, who has a very high pace and stressful job. She is also a perfectionist and can be very self-critical. Lately, she feels that she is not performing at the level she once was. As a result, she has been experiencing feelings of shame and worthlessness. Jessica has also been increasingly fatigued yet is having difficulty falling asleep at night. She also admits having difficulty concentrating, little interest in sex and has become increasingly irritable

There are two types of personality tests: objective and projective tests. Both types of tests help clinical psychologists to determine different factors of an individual's personality. Two of the most common objective assessments are the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2) and the 16PF. The MMPI-2 is a “567 true/false test that is a good measure of dysfunction within personality” (Framingham, 2016). Of all of the objective assessments the MMPI-2 is the most commonly used. It measures traits such as paranoia, hypomania, social introversion, and psychopathy as well as others by connecting various responses throughout the test. The MMPI-2 is not ideal for those individuals with healthy personalities so that is where the 16PF comes in. The 16PF measures 16 basic personality traits including: warmth, reasoning, emotional stability, dominance, liveliness, rule-consciousness, social boldness, sensitivity, vigilance, abstractness, privateness, apprehension, openness to change, self-reliance, and perfectionism. Because this assessment is done on healthier individuals, it simply allows them to understand themself, and helps their clinical psychologist to determine the best approach in treatment (Framingham,

The thing that excites me the most about being a new student here at USF is the diversity within the student body. In my high school the predominant race was white, and although there is nothing wrong with this, I like the idea of being able to meet individuals with different cultural backgrounds. Here at the University of South Florida it is evident that there is a vast amount of diversity within the campus which can simply be seen by looking around the campus. I am definitely most nervous about making new friends on campus because I am a huge introvert, which can be backed up with the personality test report that I took about a month ago. When I took the personality test on myplan.com, the results showed that I was 87% introverted and only

The topic for this week’s paper was to do an analysis about our own personality type and to include supporting documentation for why I either agreed or did not agree with the personality type that was determined from taking the Jung Typology Test.

Humans, in general, are united through their basic genetics and survival instincts, yet even with the fact that we 're all part of the same species, each and every one of us are completely unique and separate from one another. That 's because we have different personalities that are derived from what stimulates our brains and, in turn, controls our emotions and actions. These variations in personalities not only occur because of the environment, but also from our specific heritage so all of the stages of development are responsible for creating a one-of-a-kind human being. Furthermore, there are traits specific to groups of people, genders, or races, and with plenty of options for modifications, there comes possibilities for issues known as personality disorders, but with enough analysis of all the components, psychology can be used to benefit people with or without personality complications.

Personality assessment instruments continue to be widely uses by the public and widely examined by the public. Since the early 20th century a number of personality instruments have been very useful in

In this analysis gaining background information within taking the NEO-PI-R along with comparing and relating results to self-analysis and room with a cue personality project a fuller more encompassing dispositional signature is revealed, requireing all methods in testing personality traits. First, we examine the experience of taking the NEO-PI-R and the accuracy of the results. Second, a comparison between self-analysis and NEO-PI-R result specifically in correlations between methods in openness to experience and extraversion. Examining average levels of personality traits of conscientiousness and agreeableness and contradicting results in the NEO-PI-R method for neuroticism begins framing a personality profile for Linsay Sullivan. Finally by reviewing previous method, Room with a Cue, offers environmental cues validating results of the NEO-PI-R method combining similarities and building differences. Resulting in the two methods developing a well-rounded dispositional signature. Concluding the best method for understanding personality traits is a combination of all three: self-analysis, environmental cues, and NEO-PI-R, as well as, what we learn from each method.

Personality test can offer a great deal of insight to someone. After taking the Myers Brigs test, I have confirmed much of what I have thought about myself. My score is ISTJ. This stands for introversion, sensing, thinking, and judging, which very accurately describes me.

The sixteen personalities test was the only test that I took which was why it was the most accurate for me. I am unpredictable, some days I will help people if they ask me for help, and one example of that is I was helping Greg Pelleran spell and read in resource. If that is not believable then just ask him and sometimes I would not help. My moods to help others is sometimes unpredictable. I could lose my temper in a spectacular way, if someone says something rude or offensive to me I could I get irate or I could laugh about it, but usually when I do get mad I will just be silent and try to calm down. One of my weaknesses that the sixteen personalities test listed is that I am unpredictable, and another weakness that the sixteen personalities

Utilizing factor analysis, Raymond Cattell (1946) recognized 16 personality factors (16pf). Cattell believed each individual exhibits 16 distinctive personality traits, each person embodying different traits; some might be considered high in certain attributes while deemed low in others. Fellow scientists and associates criticized Cattell 's 16pf questionnaire, and postulated that 16 personality factors were too many to effectively conduct studies on human personality. Different reactions came about because of the failure to reproduce Cattell 's work. Numerous researchers, for example, Paul Barrett and Paul Kline were not able reproduce Cattell 's 16pf questionnaire (Barrett and Kline, 1982). Nevertheless, in questioning the validity of Cattell 's work and expanding on years of research examining personality traits, researchers were able to distinguish five distinct personality factors or characteristics. Cattell 's work demonstrated a methodological approach to theory development through the use of factor analysis, a relatively new approach to psychological research (Sinha &

The development of personality has long been an area of extreme interest to psychologists and psychoanalysts alike and many different theories of personality have developed over the years. From Sigmund Freud to B.F. Skinner, everyone seems to have not only an opinion of what personality is and how it develops but also an idea as to what is the best way to measure and report their findings. In order to test their theories, it was necessary to formulate methods of research that were effective, ethical and would provide a solid foundation for future personality research.<br><br>Although both the clinical and experimental methods of personality research have lent themselves to our present day understanding of the human psyche and personality,

Personality plays an important role in very expect of our lives. Our job, relationship, career, income everything has a connection between our personalities. It works like a wall for an individual so the individual cannot go beyond this particular characteristics. There are 16 types of common personality which can be described based on only four letters preferences. Two authors named duo Katharine Cooks Briggs and Isabelle Myers Briggs explained different personality test which is supposed to tell you if you are introverted or extraverted, intuitive or sensing, thinking or feeling and perceptive or judgmental. For example, Each combination such as ISFJ or ESTP or ENTP represents different characteristics, behaviors and preferences.

Personality testing and assessment refers to investigate into the features of a person’s aspects of character and psychosomatic make up. This is majorly done in organizations for numerous reasons. As recorded in Frank (2004), the initial making of personality assessment was to aid in easing the process of selecting workers for the army. Since this initial invention, much development has been experienced in personality assessment. This is apparent through the existence of timely mechanisms that have been simply invented to help in individuality assessment. The major tests that are in use up to this century are the five factor models, the MMPI and the MBTI by Meyers that uses Briggs indicators (Harwood, Beutler & Groth-Marnat, 2011).