Fight Club Movie Analysis Essay

This movie explores issues of greed, human relationships, betrayal and redemption, personal innocence and responsibility as well as the effects on the human mind

By centering their film around these themes, the creators are sharing this idea with their viewers and question them on what we think of it and how it affects us as a society. But in doing so they are manipulation us, controlling our thoughts to fit their own and to fit what they define as manipulation and what it does to a group or a society. They include what they think about the subject and share it with an impressionable audience instead of introducing it and letting the viewer have an opinion about it. But if they didn’t do it, there would be no

     This film presents an individual that chooses not to conform to modern society, and the consequences of that choice. The main character

“Life has no meaning a priori… It is up to you to give it a meaning, and value is nothing but the meaning that you choose”(Jean-Paul Satre). As is began in the mid to late 20th century, Postmodernism has become a literary movement that has greatly influenced writers, poets, music, film, culture, art, etc. While modernist theory is rational and scientific in reasoning, Postmodernism departs away from that focusing primarily on an innovative way of thought that is avant-garde and subjective. Films such as Fight Club and stranger than fiction are clear examples of postmodernism as they both hold postmodernist characteristics such as Paranoia, breaking of the fourth wall, and black comedy.

The movie is about overcoming long-standing prejudice and hatred. The main character, Derek, is a skinhead and the leader of a white supremacist group. He violently kills 2 black males who tried to steal his car. He goes to jail and has changed. Once out, he tries to keep his brother from following in his footsteps.

The movie creates an analogy similar to that of the Allegory of the cave. Within the Allegory it exemplifies humanity’s ignorance of truth and what is beyond the caves walls. Similar to that of The Truman Show, the show is the cave in which Truman has to escape the limitations that has been created for him. He manages to escape the actors, creator, and the events that work in one to keep him isolated from the real world. The movie compels us as the audience, and teaches us that the premise of the movie is to send a message to the audience that no matter how hard our elite try to construct a reality for us, our morals and souls will guide and direct us in the path that is meant for our personal

injustices and issues in the United States. The film also incorporates the military life, military

political points. This essay will provide a response to the film from a political point of view.

     A film adaptation of a book can be like hearsay. The author writes a novel to send a certain message. Someone else reads it interprets it in a different way and talks to a film producer. The film producers then take its, leaves out major events, change the ending and make a film with a completely different message than the author. The author then screams bloody murder then takes his cut from the box office. Joesph Boggs, the author of Problems with Adaptation, says “We expect the film to duplicate exactly the experience we had seeing the play or in reading the novel. That is, of course, completely impossible” (Boggs 672). No one told this theory to David Fincher, the director of

The movie’s mise-en-scene tries to shape our feelings by contrasting the two opposite societies. The movie makes the audience feel like we are a part of the movement to help stop the elite society from conforming the rest of the world to their ways. The visual information helps shape its viewer’s feelings to make us feel like we should be against the conformant, and the movie did a good job of

As a viewer I found the message behind this ideological corruption less disturbing then it seemed, superficially. Losing respect for the false values of an ethical man, and gaining respect for those values of the typical violator still did not dissuade me from making the connection to the same values of consumerism and naturalized conformity depicted to begin with. There is no questioning the means to an end when it comes to achieving wealth and success in a world where money can fix anything, even interpersonal problems.

The year 1999 saw the release of many great and fantastic titles that later on went on to become blockbusters or hit classics. One of those many hit classics was a dramatic flick called Fight Club, which starred a much younger Brad Pitt and a then relevant Edward Norton. The movie follows the story of an unnamed depressed office worker (Edward Norton) and his care-free friend Tyler Durden (Brad Pitt) as they try to manage an underground fight club. An association which soon evolves to become something much more powerful and dangerous. To the naked eye or the regular audience member, Fight Club is but a well-executed piece on the perils of mental ailments.

Fight Club, a 1999 film based around Chuck Palahniuk’s novel, was at first seen as very odd and often times questionable. However, in years since its release the movie has cultivated a specific cult following. While the movie emphasizes consumerism, it also has a reoccurring “fight the power” attitude embellished throughout the film. As for setting, it was set in a very dull, dark city and the narrator remains unnamed for the entire film. The film attempts to show the reader the effects that societal norms have on an individual’s pursuit of happiness. The entirety of this film is the dissociate identity disorder that the narrator suffers from.

From the dawn of time, people have always had a deep and violent nature hidden within there roots. Although this kind of trait is suppressed and often strongly frowned upon, under the correct conditions, it is revealed to have a powerful effect, showing positive results. Conversely, throughout its true vigorous and highly controversial content, the series Fight Club is a factual establishment. Which has such an effect, to bring out the fierce personality from almost anyone. The strings of the Film and book are based upon the story of a “ticking-time bomb insomniac… a slippery soap salesman…channeling primal male aggression into a shocking new form of therapy” (Chuck Palahniuk). Through the means of characters and overall plot Chuck Palahniuk’s

This film covers many aspects of sociology, we as the viewer are confronted with issues such as racism and peer pressure. The other main character is Combo, he is introduced as a recently released convict that has some bold nationalistic beliefs. As the movie goes on the viewer is given the impression that psychologically, Combo has some deep rooted issues that he has not confronted. This issues play into his nationalistic views of the world, he appears to act out his anger among other feelings with his behavior. Combo also has sociopathic traits, which when viewing the movie was quite disturbing to watch. Combo took a liking to Shaun in the beginning because he was an “easy