Fighting For Criminal Rights : The American Judicial System

Since the policy was enacted in the early 1990s, three strikes laws have been one of the most controversial issues facing the American criminal justice system. In general, advocates believe that locking up criminals will protect society. Critics believe that three-strike policy can only be effective with offenders that are on their last strikes (Worrall, 2008). However, other critics explain how three-strike laws don’t significantly reduce crime because most criminals mature out of the criminal lifestyle (Worrall, 2004).

Crime takes place all the time and it is America’s duty to ensure that these criminals are properly punished for their wrongdoings. With rehabilitation, one can not ensure that if given a second chance the criminal will not offend again. We need to confront crime with a proper punishment and that is where retribution comes in. With retribution society appears more secure and crimes of violence decrease. Since it is essential to control violence in society, retribution is essential. Retribution should undoubtedly be favored over rehabilitation in America’s criminal justice system because it enforces the law and ensures justice. Newman as a punishment for crime , “poor results Foundation work for other agencies to tackle crime.” Death leads to the front. Murder they are . Also open to allow them to better everyday in addition, the complex moral crime.

In the United States the criminal justice system does not always create policies that affect everyone equally. There are many policies that seem to target a specific group of people, whether this is intentional or not is beside the point. The important thing is to change the criminal justice system in order to stop race disparities. Marc Mauer in his lecture speaks of the reason for the disparity between races when it comes to the incarceration rate, as well as steps that can be taken in order to elevate, and or stop the disparity in the criminal justice system. Other topics that Mauer covers are the impact that policies can have on a specific group in the United States, and the overwhelming disproportion when it comes to drug arrest, and the people who get arrested.

The American Justice System, once seen as a model system of how every justice system should be around the world. I believe the American Justice System is more broken than ever. A reason I believe that is because of all the cases involving African Americans being killed by police officers, and that the media portrays them negatively when they are just doing their job.

The American Criminal Justice system is arguably one of the most fair systems in the world. However, like anything it has its flaws. There are many flaws but the largest three, in my opinion, would be the fact that we have the highest incarceration rate of any other country, the high penalties for drug users, as well as the jury system. The high incarceration rates and the penalties for drug users affect each other but they are still issues on their own. In fact, many of issues within our system coincide within each other.

The judicial processes that have been adopted by the current criminal justice system of the United States of America include mandatory minimums that diminish the importance of certain factors in a case such as the context of the situation and the power of judges to decide on an appropriate sentence; furthermore, they result in more serious, yet overlooked, implications of racial bias and unfair plea bargaining. Mandatory minimums are strict sentences that a judge must abide by when determining how much prison time the accused is to receive as punishment. Although the majority of offenses to which mandatory minimums apply to are drug offenses, there are a variety of offenses including immigration, firearms, and fraud that are linked to a minimum sentence. The concept of enacting mandatory minimum sentences to particular offenses has such a great influence on court verdicts that in the fiscal year of 2010 alone, “27.2% of cases involved a conviction of an offense carrying a mandatory minimum [and] 53.4%...remained subject to the mandatory minimum penalty at sentencing” (USSC, 121). When the government first instituted mandatory minimums for drug offenses with the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, it was meant to resolve the problems of drug distribution and abuse, but these sentences bring about more problems than resolutions. As the time approaches to impose a sentence for a case involving a mandatory minimum, the judge has no choice but to assign the accused at least that amount

Today the United States of America is globally ranked nineteenth in the top one hundred countries today for their criminal justice systems. Our country's police,courts, and correction systems are one of the best in the world. Each one of these systems has special functions and parts in America’s criminal justice system.

According to Maxeiner (2012); their area unit two principal objectives of criminal justice, to set up the difficulty for effective decision-making and therefore the ability to come to a decision. These a number of the cited as a number of the most things that show however Germany 's criminal justice system contrasts with the America 's criminal justice system. supported this; this essay are going to be comparison at a number of the basic variations between America’s and Germany’s scheme (Maxeiner, 2012). For instance; it 's clear that America 's judges square measure arguably disemboweled and second prosecution and police agencies is on the state level and not native level. America 's criminal justice acts on the class-conscious system and in contrast to America, Germany 's functionary square measure continually an official. Germany 's criminal procedure operates on one code and is more unified compared to America (Maxeiner, 2012). distinction between America and Deutschland’s Substantive Law one among the most variations between the Yankee and German criminal justice is that since America embraces death penalty; there 's none in Germany (Maxeiner, 2012). Germany 's sentences square measure much deemed lower compared to America, and this is often by the distinction in decision-making by judges from these nations. For example; each countries use police and prosecutors to analyze and gift a case before the court (Maxeiner, 2012). On the contrary; the excellence comes once the

The American Justice system, to me, is flawed, but I do not feel that it has been neglected. It is a sad truth that there are so many wrongs that occur in a system of corrections. However, I believe that the Justice System is playing “catch up” with society’s rapid acceleration of growth. In the space of just 10 years there has been: The Legalization of Marijuana, Legalization of Gay Marriage, Terror groups and organizations attacking large cities, Rioting has become more common, for instance in Baltimore and Ferguson and, America has become more polarized. The Justice System just cannot maintain the pace. There are also a few things that negatively impacting it and not assisting at all. For one, social media exploding any attack by a police officer has become almost a social norm and I extremely difficult, if not, impossible to incapacitate legally in today’s world. The Justice System are trying, however, and I feel that it will only be a matter of time before it gains ground on society and maintains order once more. There have been advancements in technology to help speed up the process of court hearings and also catching criminals. New organizations have been created to help stop cyber attacks and make it safer. There have been government subsidies given to the Federal Justice System for higher employment and effectiveness of their task forces. Therefore, I do not believe that it is a case of neglect affecting this country, instead, a negative impact of society’s rapid

The United States justice system has been around since the signing of the United States Constitution in 1787. It was created to protect its citizens and provide justice throughout the nation. The U.S. Justice system is broken down to three branches. These branches are Policing, Courts, and Corrections that create the justice system. Policing is the branch that enforces the law in the public. Courts is the decision to whether you are guilt, not guilty, or fined for the actions from the enforcements point of view. Corrections is the branch that carries out the sentence that are created by the courts and makes corrections to be able to be release back to society. The three branches provide equality, justice, and uphold the law from illegal

I would agree that the American justice system attempts to serve many functions and thus utilize various aspects of each philosophy of the judicial system. I don't believe that given this method, no one philosophy is capable of providing the desired effects. While each philosophy possesses factors which are capable of reducing crime or rehabilitating offenders, no one philosophy offers a complete answer to the issue of retribution and rehabilitation, incapacitation and rehabilitation, or deterrence and rehabilitation. Therefore, unless we as Americans intend on focusing on only one aspect of the philosophy, we will resolve to the continued use of these combinations.

Within our police system in America, there are gaps and loopholes that give leeway to police officials who either abuse the authority given to them or do not represent the ethical standards that they are expected to live up to by society. Because of the nature of police work, there is a potential for deterioration of these ethical and moral standards through deviance, misconduct, corruption, and favoritism. Although these standards are set in place, many police are not held accountable for their actions and can easily get by with the mistreatment of others because of their career title. While not every police abuses his or her power, the increasingly large percentage that do present a problem that must be recognized by the public as well as those in charge of police departments throughout our country. Police officials are abusing their power and authority through three types of misconduct known as malfeasance, misfeasance, and nonfeasance and these types are being overlooked by management personnel who rarely intervene even though they know what is happening. Misconduct is wrong because it violates rights and cause people to be wrongly accused of crimes or be found not guilty and set free when they are still an endangerment to other people. The public needs to be educating on what is happening in the police system in hopes that someone will speak out to protect citizens from being

Capital punishment which furthermore identifies as the death penalty, execution has been a hot topic in the public eye for a while. The question on lots of minds is whether it is acceptable for the state to terminate one’s life for the crime they have committed. A significant issue that we will address is that the justice system over time formulates mistakes. Whether it’s processing the evidence improperly or missing an enormous piece of the puzzle, making mistakes can happen. If the justice system executed an innocent there is no way for it to redeem itself. There is no way for a person to be brought back to life. As I began to research further into this issue, I became aware that plenty of people agree with the idea of capital punishment being endorsed; however, I believe asking this question will be the key to finally finding closure to this issue.

We, as a society, are not perfect. Many innocent people are falsely accused of crimes they did not commit. Many people make mistakes. In a capital punishment, case there is and should never be any room for mistakes because someone¡¯s life is at risk. A twenty-three year long study released on June 12, 2000 states that two- thirds of all capital punishment cases did contain flaws. Flaws so serious as to warrant a retrial. The study also renewed calls for review, or total abolition of the death penalty, which is on a state-by-state basis. The study also stated that cases returned for mew trials that only seven percent were found not guilty, while ninety three percent of those tried were convicted again, with many receiving lighter sentences. Less than twenty percent received the death penalty the second time. Even though ninety three percent where still re-convicted there was still that seven percent who was found not guilty. If these seven percent had had a second chance by retrial, they would have been innocent people put to death. Can our society bear to know they would have put innocent people to death on its conscience?

Though capital punishment does indeed fail to eliminate crime from the streets, the possible execution of innocent individuals outweighs many other concerns. Most capital punishment cases pose great difficulty in the determination of guilt or innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. An example of possible wrongful execution appears in