III. The Figural Strategies of Eve
Analysis of the Fall of Man
The strategies utilized to portray the mythical nature of Eve within the Italian Renaissance represent both the shame and seduction that the archetype promotes.The Fall of Man by Michelangelo depicts the the temptation of Eve by the serpent in the garden and the subsequent exile from Eden based upon disobedience to God surrounding the consumption of the forbidden fruit (Genesis 3:6-3:10).The affirmation of the Church’s ideology on the innate nature of women to sin is propagated in this piece. Michelangelo. The Fall of Man. 1512. Cappella Sistina, Vatican.
The transition from purity to corruption is displayed in the contrast between the left and right halves of the figure, where the positioning of both Adam and Eve are adapted to demonstrate their guilt. The nature of the figural strategies of both Adam and Eve in the left quadrant of the piece are open, with physical action exuding confidence and a greater saturation of color in the skin tone representing vitality. In the right quadrant of the piece the figures displayed towards the edge of the work with body positioning hunched, and shading of the figures becoming darker and more obscure suggesting the emotional transition to shame. The connection between woman and sin is demonstrated in the middle of the painting where the connection Eve shares with the serpent, in both physical touch and gender, indicates her temptation and predisposition to corruption.The focus specifically on Eve within these two narrative scenes is indicative of her fall, through the use of strategic position,open to closed, and shading, saturated and bright to muted and dark, to represent her turn from purity to corruption. Eve within the left side of the painting is unabashedly displayed, maintaining a position of subservience to Adam beside his feet. However Eve’s gaze and extension towards the serpent serves as the focal point. The focus on Eve indicates her importance in the transgression without the acknowledgement of Adam. This interaction supports the argument of women's ability to be seduced if left unassisted by the moral compasses of man. The hand placement additionally parallels the God and Adam portraiture
In his research, Meshberger analyzes the painting the painting which portrays Adam with an outstretched arm extending towards God. The writer believes this signifies the moment God instills intellect into Adam as he stretches his arm towards Adam’s naked life form. Additionally, Adam appears to be lying on a hill in an almost lifeless in an environment void of other creatures. The opposite side of the fresco depicts God descending from the heavens, surrounded by a host
The woman is depicted as a creature of temptation, a selfish enslaver of men. She embraces the man, and appears to be sucking the life out of him.
In the painting, Eve stands by an evil serpent and is falling for his lies and charm while eating an apple. On the other side of the painting, Adam is holding the apple that he received from Eve. Adam and Eve are naked in the paintings, which represents their purity and innocence. They do however use leaves to cover the private areas of their body. The paintings were made to be life sized. Both, Adam and Eve are shown to be tall and muscular. Durer did not put too much detail in the background because he did not want the background to be a distraction from the beauty of Adam and Eve. Adam appears to be hesitant in the painting, with his right hand open in an almost defensive kind of matter. Eve on the other hand looks like she is trying to persuade Adam of something. The painting is an example of implied time and motion because these actions are being implied and it is hard to know for sure what the actual motions will continue to be, all we know for sure is that both characters have different things on their mind by the way they are holding their bodies and their facial
It as well is in an ellipses shape where it is in an oval shape filling most of the canvas. This piece has a very dark atmosphere, as the only highlighted images are that of Christ and and the adulteress. There are people surrounding them all dressed in greys and greens. Jesus is dressed in an ivory which is a color in which people of importance often wore. The adultress life-drained body is looking down towards her exposed breasts as she comes to understand her fate. This painting conveys the emotion of a bible story about Jesus forgiving an adulteress. The emotions run very high as the individual 's facial expressions are locked in surprise and anger. Anger towards the woman and utter shock as to Jesus forgiveness and compassionate heart towards her. Showing Christ bending down to write in the sand as the pharisees behind him are appalled at what he has to say. “He who does not sin may throw the first stone” John 8:7. This reflects reaction to Mannerism, but also the social turmoil of the time. According to the Council of Trent and the Catholic church artworks should be a clear, intelligible subject realistically interpreted in order to stimulate piety. This was part of the reason that the artwork turned towards naturalism, becoming emotionally engaging and intense.
This is a representation of how the political and religious systems in the Late Medieval Ages treated women as the subordinates of men. It is the woman who attempts to bribe the skeletons with a bowl of coins to try to cheat out of death. None of the other male figures attempt to cheat death. This is significantly similar to the Christian biblical story of Adam and Eve and how it was Eve’s fault for eating the apple and causing orignal sin. The Christian idea and stereotype of women trying to cheat the system and sinning has still be translated through this painting. However, it is clear that the attempts to cheat death are futile and that death has no biases or judgements.
Francesca once confided in Dante, “Love, that releases no beloved from loving, took hold of me so strongly through his beauty that, as you see, it has not left me yet. Love led the two of us unto one death” (Inf. V, 103-106). Hundreds of years later, Francesca’s words still ring true. However, she was actually not speaking of love, but lust. The topic of pure, divine love is explored in this epic poem, particularly in Canto III when Dante first enters the depths of hell. Throughout Canto V of Dante Alighieri’s Inferno, the topic of lust is examined as it related to Florence and the world of the late Middle Ages. In the depths of hell, the topics of divine love and lust are placed in stark contrast to one another. These thoughts translate into modern American society and offer insight into our cultural practices.
We tell stories to remember history, but these tales aren’t as static as the facts of history. Each time a story is told, it changes with the storyteller’s interpretation. Paintings are no exception. One of the most famous stories in mainstream Christianity is the story of Adam and Eve. The story of the mother and father of all humans disobeying God and eating from the forbidden tree of knowledge, and being punished for the misdeed, is passed down as a lesson about why people must obey God. There have been numerous artistic depictions of this story created throughout the ages, two of the most famous being created by Michelangelo and Cranach. Adam and Eve by Cranach and Adam and Eve by Michelangelo are both depictions of Adam and Even eating the forbidden fruit. Cranach demonstrates his viewpoint of the act as an unwitting sin using a path of blame from the serpent all the way to Adam and Eve as well as bold colors to emphasize vitality and pureness lost. Michelangelo, on the other hand, shows his belief that it was deliberate disobedience, demonstrated by the integration of snake and man as the source of temptation and a barren landscape to imply their lack of remorse. Ultimately, Cranach shows a reason to forgive, while Michelangelo justifies the punishment.
An excellent example of the Madonna/whore complex in Renaissance art is Carlo da Camerino’s altarpiece, The Madonna of Humility with the Temptation of Eve. In the altarpiece, the Mary sits with Christ and is depicted as humble and virtuous, an idealized woman to demonstrate the role of women in the Church. Below Mary lies Eve, largely nude, sexualized, and intertwined with a serpent. Fur is wrapped around her hips, a symbol of lust. She displays the characteristics of dangerous femininity that was disparaged by the church.
The great thing about art, is that there are multiple portrayals of one idea but, the artist’s own personal style allows one to feel something that another may not. Early Renaissance painters, Giotto di Bondone and Duccio di Buoninsegna established their own unique style to depict a biblical scene known as, The Betrayal of Christ. Through a close analysis of each artist’s representation of, The Betrayal of Christ, one is able to compare and contrast the artists own understanding of the scene through their attention to detail, character, and space throughout the painting. When examining these two works, one will have a stronger emotional response towards Giotto’s interpretation rather Duccio’s, due to his methods of handling organization, figures, and space.
Concerning color, there is a stark contrast between the figure on the painting and the background. More specifically, the figure of the woman is predominantly delineated in white color, especially pale, ashen white, as far her apparel and facial complexion are concerned, while there are also various hues of grey, with respect to her hair and accessory feather. These white and grey shades are vividly contrasted with the prevailing red and crimson hues of the background (viz. the drape, armchair, and table). Moreover, one can detect colors of dark green (jewelry), some beige on the left (pillar), and darker or lighter shades of blue on the right side of the canvas (sky), which all in concert and in addition to the subtle purple hue forming the sun or moon exude a certain dramatic sentiment. Also, there is brown, which often easily segues into gold (viz. books and attire details respectively). The main contrast of colors between white and red would be interpreted as serving the purpose of rendering the figure of the woman, and especially her face, the focal point of the work, despite, paradoxically enough, the lush red shades at the background. Bearing that in mind, the significance of the woman’s face will be enlarged upon later, when discussing aspects of her identity.
The serpent in Adam and Eve by Michelangelo is strong and large opposed to the serpent in Adam and Eve by Cranach who is humble and small. The serpent in Adam and Eve by Michelangelo looks as if he is half man. The lower part of his body looks like a large snake that is wrapped around the trunk of the tree. The top half of the serpent is a strong, muscular man looking as if he has the most power out of everyone in the piece of art. The strength that comes off of the half man shows assertive influences over Adam and Eve but especially over Eve. He is influencing Eve directly by handing the forbidden fruit to her. This comes off as pressuring her to take the fruit from him. The serpent in Michelangelo’s art, Adam and Eve, is clearly seen in the
The painting ends with the “Last Judgement” on the right panel which shows people suffering. The center panel shows all the “Earthly Delights” such as games, music, romance turned into sins like sloth, gluttony, and lust. The meaning behind this shows that
Obvious from the start is the artist's careful attention to details, illustrated in the richly decorated background and characters' attire. Employing this general density automatically enhances the Virgin's gaze, making it charged with severity, intense. On
Artwork and creativity have been deeply ingrained in cultures around the globe since the beginning of time. Major Historic and religious figures were often portrayed in pieces of art as an expression of faith. Eve has been painted, sculpted and drawn in many ways and through several different viewpoints; these creations have shaped the opinion of Eve in different communities for thousands of years. I am asking the question, “How has the portrayal of Eve in artwork throughout history affected our modern day perception of her?”
Machiavelli paints Christ as a beautiful cherub, standing gracefully in his mother’s hands and following her gaze. In Machiavelli’s painting, we are given a deeply intricate painting, full of painstakingly decorated clothings. However, Uccello gives us a very simple, naturalistic (albeit rather ugly) portrayal of baby Jesus in his mother’s hands. She holds him slightly away from her chest in careful hands, as though she were showing off a jewel, not too unsimilar to Machiavelli’s Virgin, who holds the baby close with one hand. In ‘Virgin and Child’, the baby is leaning to the left earnestly, and the virgin follows this with her eyes; looking to where he is moving. A similar left-leaning movement is found in Machiavelli’s painting. The leftwards movement may be related to the classical representation of heaven being on Christ’s left-hand side in Doom paintings (examples of this being Fra Angelico’s ‘Last Judgement’, or Stefan Lochner’s ‘Last Judgement’). Some also see this movement as being an engagement with the viewer, as though Jesus was attempting to crawl out of the