Figurative Language Versus Literal Language

Durkin, A., 2013. James's Broken English: Metaphors and Meaning in the Prefaces. Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory, 69(2), pp.55-82. Kovecses, Z., 2010. Metaphor: A practical introduction.

“Strumpet! Strumpet!” is what the people in Brave New World would say to the real world’s society because of with the government has told them. Totalitarian government in this society of Brave New World is a way to control the masses to become just a mass of bodies to work and only complete their assigned jobs. In Brave New World, Aldous Huxley uses figurative language and details to explain political and social issues in the 1920s-1930s when this novel was written.

effective because it allows the reader to envision the workspace. “Grammar is not just a pain in

Figurative language is language that which expressions with a different meaning from what it may seem like at if taken literally. By using figurative language, it allows for authors to better develop points, ideas, actions, or scenery. In the stories “Canyons” written by Gary Paulsen and “Treasure of Lemon Brown” written by Walter Dean Myers the authors use figurative language to develop the scene and characters in a creative way and more interesting way for the reader.

The use of figurative language in writing brings a story to life in the mind of the reader giving them a better grasp of the events taking place. Using hyperbole, simile and personification serves to develop the characters of a story as well as enhancing its theme (Kirszner and Mandell, 2012).

Every morning, a 71 year-old male stranger accompanies me on my way to school. I only know of his name, but I enjoy his company and chuckle as he comments on my generation’s use of language. Yet once NPR’s linguistic segment of Fresh Air ends, Geoff Nunberg’s witty remarks fade into the abyss. In the quietness of the car, I am left to revel in my own passion for languages: a transformative journey through Spanish and Chinese.

The speaker did a very good job with his speech. His speech I believe is more informative, because he is describing his recent experience with appendicitis. The area that I liked most about his speech was his introduction. He had a very good hooked that got a lot of people’s attention including my own. He scared me for a moment, because he made everybody believe that he was going to show everybody his appendix that he just had removed from his body. Instead he showed the appendix of a book. Also, as he presented his speech he expressed what happened to him with very personal information. This information helped him establish his credibility. He presented his speech very well and sounded very confident. However, there were a few brief pauses

1. Figurative Language: As Eric Schlosser is introducing Carl N. Karcher in the opening pages of the novel; he refers to his life as a tale by Horatio Alger, growing from modest upbringings, to establish a fast food empire. This quote uses an allusion to the talented author of Horatio Alger whose works often revolve around working middle class fighting adversity to become wealthy, which is the fulfillment of the American dream. Karcher’s life resembles a real life story that can be illustrated by Alger in one of his works comparing his upscale to greatness by pioneering ideas changing the way Americans eat and live.

Everyone has heard the saying, “sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will

Jesus said, “And I say to you, make friends for yourselves by unrighteous mammon, that when you fail, they may receive you into an everlasting home.” (Lk.16.9). In this verse Jesus was not telling the crowd to use their wealth to gain friendships or relationships. He was telling them to use the resources they have for spiritual significant purposes. Jets expresses, “Jesus uses the parable to inculcate in his disciples the need to be equally wise in their use of material possessions in light of the coming eschatoﰀ logical kingdom.” (30). Stansbury , “The implications of these passages repeatedly int toward the development of egalitarian relationships among participants in the organization, toward the inclusion of social outcasts in organizational

Weasel words are modifying words that undermine, contradict or weaken a direct message contained in the word, phrase or clause they accompany. These commonly overused words are ambiguous, unnecessary and should be avoided.

José Ortega y Gasset, a renowned philosopher once wrote: “The metaphor is probably the most fertile power possessed by man”. Metaphors form a pervasive part of rhetoric, because they have a great influence of our cognitive process. (Pauley, 2014) The use of metaphors in rhetoric is very common; as metaphors have the power to make people act despite the ideologies that are being put forth. In this essay, the effectiveness of metaphors in an instance of rhetoric will be examined, as well as the implications that come as a consequence of utilizing metaphors in an instance of rhetoric. The instance of rhetoric that will be used in this particular case

The poem Echo is about a voice speaking to her lover to come back within her eyes. Throughout the entire work, there is a variety of figurative language, imagery, and symbolism utilized by Rossetti to help the reader understand the greatest desire for her lost lover to return.

D. Brent Sandy is a professor and the chair of the department of religious studies at Grace College in Indiana (back cover). He has undertaken the task of answering some very big questions: How does the language of prophecy work?; What can we discover from prophesies that have already been fulfilled?; How were the prophesies stated?; What did the prophets intend the original audience to understand?;How do we determine when a prophet is using figurative speech? What are people of today to learn from writings of two thousand years ago?; and What does God want us to know about the future? His belief that “our ideas about things we have never experienced are largely controlled by things we have experienced” (25) and that “under divine empowerment,

Analysis of “Out, Out” Analyzing poetry can be long and challenging unless the poet has included tools for such a task. Thankfully, Robert Frost is a master of this and makes analyzing his poems a bit easier as well as writing poems that are so interesting, they must be read multiple times to truly comprehend what he wrote the poem about.. In his poem, “Out, Out”, Frost uses point of view, poetic devices and figurative language, and even creates a mood of sorrow in such a simple way that the reader can easily comprehend the story and feel sad about what happens as if they witnessed it.