preview

Film Analysis: Precious Knowledge

Decent Essays

Film- Precious Knowledge Precious Knowledge is a documentary that takes place in Tucson, Arizona and focuses on how the Unified School district wants to completely ban the Mexican American Studies Program. In the film there were many scenes with examples of rhetorical appeal. I believe that the way the film was set up since the beginning had an impactful and direct emotional appeal on the audience. For instance, in the first scenes of the film we have the opportunity to get to know the main characters in a more intimate level. We are introduced to their Mexican heritage, their lifestyle, their families and their everyday struggles. We learn about their dreams to pursue a higher education in a society where racism regimes. We are then inform …show more content…

We as audience are immediately put in these characters shoes not only as Mexican-Americans but as students who are also trying to further our education, get a profession, and have economic stability in the future. This allows us as audience to have an emotional response such as joy as we see these characters discovery of self-identity and growing empowerment through the classrooms. Witnessing how their knowledge is expanding by them asking questions, watching them being pushed by their passionate teachers, teaching them how to think critically about the world while also learning self- appreciation and their communities. As audience we are instantly filled with anger when we become aware that politician Tom Horne has opposed to the teaching of ethnic studies by proposing the House Bill 2281, claiming that the teachers were planning a conspiracy to overthrow the American Government. As audience we feel like these characters are a true representation of our aspirations and our struggles as human beings. Watching how this ethnic studies program has proven to be successful in improving the education of its students a part of us feel like we are succeeding with the characters but as soon as we find out they want to remove the program we feel like they have taken something away from us as well making us feel …show more content…

Where he tries to use “Ethos” appeal in his argument to eliminate the teaching of ethnic studies. Making the audience believe that he is the best person that can make decisions on the ethnic studies program because of his past experiences. For example, when he begins to talk about how when he was in high school in 1963 he participated in the march where Martin Luther King a political activist in the Civil Rights Movement gave his famous “I have a dream” speech where he says that “…he wanted his son to be judged by the quality of his character and not the color of his skin.” Horne uses facts and uses Dr.King words to gain credibility as a speaker by manipulating Dr. King’s words and claiming that he is fighting for racial justice. Horne says, that he is just fighting against what he thinks is wrong because all that the ethnic studies program does is dividing students by ethnicity. Which he claims should be abolished. Horne says, that they should be teaching students how to treat others as individuals and not on the basis of what race they were born into. He says that there are better ways to get students to perform academically and get students to want to go to college instead of infusing them with racial ideas. Then he ends by saying that the students who were behind him chanting were being “rude” and claiming that these students are not

Get Access