Josselyn Ventura SOC 112: Medical Sociology Prof. Veronica Kelley 29 September 2015 Paper #1 The film “…First Do No Harm” shares the experience of a blue-collar family in the Unites States, whose youngest member is diagnosed with epilepsy. The parents not having any prior experience with the illness are completely ignorant in regards to the medical procedures that must be followed to assist their son. Therefore, they rely on the doctor assigned to their son Robbie’s case and his situation unfortunately worsens as a result of unresponsive healthcare system. The disrespect with which Robbie’s and his parents are treated negatively impacts the family, especially their health. a) Describe 2 examples of the healthcare system in the film not being responsive/respectful to the patient. Discuss how this disrespect can negatively impacts health. Typically, it is thought that doctors and the rest of the staff at health care facilities are trustworthy. However, Robbie’s neurologist, Dr. Abbasac, proves this thought wrong. Robbie’s condition got worse while being under her supervision, because she kept changing the treatment and increasing the dose of the medications. Due to the doctor’s actions, Robbie’s seizures became more frequent and lasted longer. He also started getting skin rashes, and his behavior was dramatically changed. If Robbie’s parents would have not become aware of the ketogenic diet, his youngest son could have died. Following the doctor’s instructions of allowing
Every one of us has relied on a medical professional at least a few times in our lives. When we get seriously ill, or suffer a serious injury, we put our health in the hands of doctors, nurses, and pharmacists, fully expecting to be treated with a certain degree of professionalism and safety. Unfortunately, sometimes the expected care is not given, or not given to the extent which the ailment requires. In these situations, we can feel blindsided, confused, even taken advantage of.
these standards is forced upon them. Nurse Ratched uses intimidation and weaknesses to ensure the patients will give up their will to rebel against the injustices. In One Flew Over the
1. Throughout history, a number of reformers have sought to improve the quality of medical care. What common thread connects them? Why did some fail? What were the successful able to see/do that others weren’t?
According to AAPA, a principal value of healthcare professions is to respect the health, safety, welfare, and dignity of all human beings.2 It is evident in the film that the team of Dr. Kelekian and Dr. Posner, who are in charge of Dr. Bearing’s treatment, disregards these human rights, that healthcare providers swear to protect. Throughout the movie, Dr. Kelekian and Dr. Posner view Dr. Bearing more as a research experiment than a patient. In one
Select an ethical dilemma related to health policy from the categories of moral values, professional regulation, health of individuals in society, or distributive justice. What are the controversies surrounding this issue? What are the opposing ethical principles? How has past or current health policy addressed this dilemma? Support your reasoning with reference citations.
In the movie The Doctor they showed positive professional and negative behaviors. Some of the positive professional things are that Dr. Mackee told his interns to not call someone terminal if they aren’t dying or are already dead. Dr. Mackee talks differently to his patients now that he knows that he has cancer. Dr. Mackee became friends with another cancer patient named June Ellis. Dr. Mackee helps a patient that had a stroke and that has a lisp caused by having the secure and that patient is suing his practice because he blames them for him having the secure but Dr. Mackee sees that he needs help so he goes and tells him that he will have someone come and get Mr. Richards keys out of his car and that Dr. Mackee will have them left at the front desk. Nurse Nancy finally sang when Dr. Mackee went in for his surgery to remove his tumor. Dr. Mackee finally spoke after his surgery and told his wife that he loves her and then they were happy because they didn’t know if he would be able to speak again after having the surgery because the tumor was located in his voice box and they risked losing his vocal cords.
The provider makes several neurological implications based on his observations and testing. Dr. P’s major concerns was that he would make frequent mistakes such as being unable to recognize students faces or when he thinks he is patting the head of a student but instead it is a water hydrant. The doctor takes a look at the different
However, as time went on, several problems arose which had to do with the principle of justice in healthcare. In America, it is the accepted norm that it is unjust to treat one person better or worse than another person, in similar circumstances (Tong, 2007, p.29). In an attempt
http://www.canadian-healthcare.org . In this assignment, I am going to explain how different rules in two social systems (Public Hospitals vs. Walk-in Clinics) have a strong impact on humans’ behaviors.
I believe that while the treatment of the patients didn't treat all their emotional and social wants, it covered all their medical needs. It was shown to be difficult to care for the insane and infirm patients in the film,
The doctor and his patient portray a troubled encounter that is subject to discussion. This short story reflects real or plausible issues comparable in real life. One example of such an event in Brooklyn when a construction worker filed a lawsuit against a hospital for subjecting him to a rectal exam against his wishes. According to his lawyer, the man begged,”please don’t do that’’ as he was held down, and he punched one of the doctors before being sedated and examined without consent. As a result the man allegedly developed post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of the experience.(Tsai,1) Given to the poor man’s circumstance and how the medical professionals treated him, you can now see how unfit doctors can be to their own patients.
In the health care system, a multitude of errors occurs on a daily basis. Doctors, nurses, orderly’s, etc., everyone in health care settings has responsibilities that warrant careful attention. This was exhibited in the case study titled ‘An Extended Stay’. In this case study, we are introduced to a middle-aged man in his 60s named Mr. Stanley Londborg. He presented with several health conditions, including a seizure disorder, hypertension (also known as high blood pressure), and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Londborg was no stranger to the hospital and was known fairly well by faculty members. Londborg paid a visit to the Emergency Room at the hospital complaining of wheezing and breathing complications. The physician that examined Mr. Londborg yielded his symptoms as an acute worsening of
Q4) I don’t recall being in a clinic or hospital that made me felt that I was just another dollar, but instead that I was just another patient instead of a patient. What I mean by this is the wait patients have to endure when they go see their physicians even by appointments in clinics or waiting for rounds in the hospitals. This could influences how individuals see their quality of care and I would argue that most patients don’t get upset because they feel that they are just seen as a dollar, because in a sense, they aren’t being seen by their physician. Instead, they get more upset about the lack of care and concern they received which can lead to feeling like they are just another paycheck. I think this is something to think about because
In this paper, we are going to come up with a brief overview first, then discuss what legal and ethical issues arose through the film particularly on John Q’s action to save his only son’s life. Succeeding examine if healthcare is a right or a privilege and see if people’s social class determine the
Let the right one in is a romantic horror movie which directed by Swedish director Tomas Alfredson in 2008. It received a number of prestigious awards including the “Best International Feature” at the 2008 Calgary International Film Festival, the “Best Narrative Feature” from Tribeca Film Festival in 2008, and etc. (Wikipedia, 2014). This film bases on the bestselling novel of the same name by Swedish author John Ajvide Lindqvist. It describes a 12 years old boy Oskar who is a victim of bullying from school. He grew up with the single parent and has been overlooked by his family. Once he meets Eli who is a new to this small town, two dissocial children become friends to each other. Nevertheless, Oskar finds that Eli sinking to a series of criminal cases and he finally reveals the truth of mysterious Eli.