Fin Report

In the beginning of the stock market game I bought only stocks in only 5 different companies, those companies were all companies that I was familiar with. The five companies were Apple, American Eagle, Costco, Disney and Hershey. I bought Apple stock because who doesn’t think of Apple when they think of big companies with a lot of money.

As of November 17, 2017, we had a negative return of 7.46%, whereas the benchmark index generated a return of 3.48%, meaning that we underperformed the benchmark by 10.94%. The decrease in market value of common stock holdings accounted for approximately 3.46% of the total loss, and losses from futures contracts accounted for approximately 4%. The standard deviation of our portfolio was 3.41%. Our portfolio had a shape ratio of -2.35%, and the information ratio was computed to be -9.6%.

Our biggest gainer was Telsa Income Statement with 19,362.75 dollars. On the other hand, our biggest loser was Berkshire Hathaway with 40,552.00 dollars. After doing the stock simulation game, some lessons we learned were the importance of diversification, how to think in short and long terms, and how many shares to buy in a company. It was necessary to buy multiple stocks, because if someone bought one company and it failed then they just lost all their money.

I normally do not respond to our CFO's weekly report. But, I have a duty to do so based on the deliberate actions, once again, to undermine me as superintendent.

Miller is an adherent of fundamental analysis, an approach to equity investing he had gleaned from a number of sources. Miller’s approach was research-intensive and highly concentrated. Nearly 50% of Value Trust’s assets were invested in just 10 large-capitalization companies. While most of Miller’s investments were value stocks, he was not averse to taking large positions in the stocks of growth companies. Overall, Miller’s style was eclectic and difficult to distill.

A breakdown of our overall long-term strategy as well as the year-by-year decisions and review will follow in order to assess how well we met investor expectations as well as attempting to beat

It is important for stockholders to continuously re-evaluate their investments. Although some investors do this more frequently and thoroughly than others, the majority of shareholders do so at least once each year. Therefore, Torres’ desire to update her analysis in order to determine whether Costco was still operating efficiently makes perfect sense. After thorough examination, my analysis proves that Costco remains one of the industry’s leading competitors and there seems to be no reason for Torres to sell her shares as long as she wishes to retain holdings of a retail wholesale club in her portfolio.

The stock that I have analyzed is Apple (AAPPL), which it falls under the technology sector and trades under the NASDAQ. This sector holds the biggest companies around the world. A lot of these companies are well known such as: Amazon, Google, LinkedIn, and etc. The technology sector is an undeniably investment opportunity for every investor around the world. Lets face it technology keeps improving and we have only seen the beginning of it. These companies, such as Apple, are associated with constant innovation and invention. Our modern economy relies upon the technology sector to improve quality, productivity, and profitability.

There is no denying that AMD and Nvidia have had a spectacular year. Because of rapidly growing sales and a thriving market, AMD and Nvidia have boasted returns of 260.5% on average since January alone. While most people threw in the towel on both stocks after seeing a mere 50% return, I didn’t. I saw both AMD and Nvidia as high-growth and undervalued investments — even after the stocks soared. So what makes me change my position now?

“…anointing winners and losers on the basis of 12 months’ worth of performance is silly in the context of portfolios that are being managed with incredibly long time horizons.” — David F. Swensen, Chief Investment Officer, Yale University1

Over the past five weeks, I’ve been following, tracking and studying five stocks in-particular and seeing how they have progressed over these past couple of weeks in the stock market. The stocks that I have chosen are Facebook, Amazon, General Motors, McDonald’s and Apple. The reason why I have chosen these companies are because they are the most successful companies not only in there designated field of business but in the world. These companies are constantly mentioned as the top companies in multiple business magazines such as Forbes, Bloomberg Businessweek, etc. I also plan on learning more about these companies and how they do in the stock market and how price fluctuating can cause stock prices and shares to affect the stock market.

Further, our strategy involved paying attention to current events and attempting to use them to generate a return. For example, Horizon Pharmaceuticals’ stock price took a nosedive after an October 19th New York Times article suggested that Horizon was attempting to thwart Express Scripts’ attempts to lower the price of prescription drugs. The decision was made to buy 100 shares of stock in Horizon when its price spiraled down to a measly $14.62 per share, as we expected Horizon would do something to stop the bleeding, and historically has been a pretty volatile stock. Horizon came back with a scorching rebuttal in an open letter later that day, spiking its stock price more than 30% on October 23rd, and by October 28th, this move landed us our greatest return of any stock that we purchased and held until the end of the period: 18% (see appendix).

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has recently released four new standards: FRS 100 Application of Financial Reporting Requirements; FRS 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework; FRS 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland; and FRS 103 Insurance Contacts. FRS 100 basically describes who does what with the new UK GAAP. It describes which principles apply to which type of business; when a business can apply the reduced disclosure framework; and when a business should follow a statement of recommended practices, or SORP. FRS 101 lays out a reduced disclosure framework for entities. Certain entities can choose to use this reduced disclosure framework while creating their financial statements. FRS 102

The project proposal will be critical analysed before it will established in South Korea. In the first assignment will looked in depth in political, country risk, FDI theories and motive for the project. In the second assignment, the cost of capital for the project was calculated, stating the risk for both the parent and subsidiaries.

Based on the financial ratios given, this section will compare and contrast the financial strengths of Company X and Company Y in order to suggest Tringale Ltd to take decision regarding which of the above companies to chose for investment. This section provides comments on financial performance areas based on the data given, and presents report to the Board of Directors of Tringale Ltd by recommending which of the two investment opportunities is better.