Final Argument Paper On Terrorism Essay

Better Essays
Final Argument Paper Introduction Since the brutal attack America received on September 11, 2001, the United States government gave authorization for the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” to be performed on terrorism suspects, captured and held within U.S. custody. To obtain useful information that could possibly, save thousands more lives in the future, than were lost that fateful day. It was also used, as a method to help increase current protection methods, and to obtain information and/or location of other suspected terrorist who were known to be involved in plotting and planning future attacks on our American homeland (Human Rights Watch, 2014). It is also a well-known fact that throughout the years since the attack on 9/11 United States government officials continued to deny that any of the approved “advanced interrogation techniques” constituted any form of torture, nor where they considered the exact replica, or equivalent to any known form of human torture procedures experienced by many people throughout the world. Within this deductive essay, both sides of the issue at hand will be argued. Any information obtained and expressed throughout this essay will support my stance as to why any form of torture is not the safest nor the most reliable method, to use as a source to obtain reliable, actionable information. And why it is not permissible to use torture as a justifiable judicial means of punishment or information extraction but the possible use of
Get Access