Final Assigment: Op-Ed Smoking Bans

Children 's lungs are still developing at young ages and adult’s occurs harmful effects on the heart. There are millions of children breathing smoke in their home with second hand smoke and second hand smokers don’t realize that their children are especially at more risk to their health than they are. Smoking in vehicles with under age of 18 should ban the law and children whose parents smoke around should also be illegal because in a small enclosed space such as a vehicle with a sunroof has more toxic air which expose breathing more rapidly. According to the author Leada Grove, created an article from AL.com wrote that “80 percent of smoke is invisivble and opening windows does not remove its harmful effects. The level of toxic air in a vehicle where someone is smoking is up to 10 times worse than levels that is considered hazardous”. Approximately 250,000 children and adults (non smokers) have died from health problems that exposed to secondhand smoke. Some states in the U.S. had established the secondhand smoke law that is illegal, however other states are still under construction to establish this law. All states should make this law a new law for all second hand smokers because as of right now our country have gained a major health issue and money wise for the government.

Tobacco has existed for long as we have known about history, but due to the negative effects of it to the broader community Tobacco has sparked greater controversy across the globe. Many people argue that it is the government’s responsibility to protect the individual but on the contrary some disagree and believe it’s up to the individual. This essay will elaborate above mentioned aspects and lead to a logical conclusion.

Every day in America families’ gathers together to celebrate special events or the accomplishments of one of its members. Many times these special moments can be ruined or brought to an abrupt end due to others nearby smoking. Public spaces should be safe and accessible to all members of society to use without the inconvenience of someone else’s smoking ruining their outing or causing health issues to flare up such as, asthma. People do have the right to choose to smoke if they desire, but nonsmokers have the right to go out to public places with their family and not be exposed to harmful secondhand smoke. Studies have shown that secondhand smoke is just as harmful as smoking and leads to a higher occurrence of cancer and heart disease. Furthermore,

When one’s individual freedom connotes sacrificing that of a fellow human being’s health then that freedom needs to be restricted. People in the United States of America have the additional right to choose to engage in healthy habits and avoid the damaging ones. Thus, if an individual is fixed on being selfish and performs poor habits near these people such as smoking and driving a pollutant vehicle, then that liberty should cease to exist.

In this study thy had a sample of children whose ages where around 12-114 and the looked at the parent’s views towards smoking and looked at the children’s smoking habit. The results showed that 80% of the children who had parents who did not smoke or was against smoking was 7 times less likely to smoke. In conclusion the parent’s views have a role of the children’s smoking habits

Tobacco is one of the world's dangerous drug which is haunting human lives to death. Over a billion adults are addicted to this drug and wasting their money, time and health. Nowadays there has been an ongoing debate/discussion among many people about the role of government in restricting the usage of Tobacco and thereby safeguarding the health of the public. In my personal opinion, both government and the Individual together needs to work to overcome this problem.

Smoking is an expensive habit. People who smoke cigarettes can spend as much as $2,500 a year on them. Smokers’ claim that it helps relax them and it releases stress but the negative aspects of smoking outweigh the positive. Smoking is a health hazard for smokers and non-smokers. Smokers should have the right to choose what to do with their own health but they should respect non-smokers. Many people believe that there are good and bad outcomes from smoking. I believe that smoking is bad and that it should be banned.

A spate of enactments denying cigarette smoking in encased open spaces, predominantly on grounds of general wellbeing security, as of late cleared crosswise over urban areas around the globe. This is in coupled with a pile of progressively prohibitive national laws that rose on the back of the endorsement of the WHO Framework for Tobacco Control by more than one 168 nations in 2005. The focal civil argument on the undeniably prohibitive tobacco laws rotates on the degree to which general wellbeing intrigues defense ought to ground political intercession in a private great as tobacco smoking, which curiously is frequently lumped in the nourishment and refreshment classification (Tremblay et al 35). The applicable lawful and moral inquiries consequently

Proposed bills are being passed around in many different states to ban the use of cigarette smoking. Banning the controlled substance, nicotine, will put people in jail or up to a 6,250 fine if they continue to use the drug. Even though banning cigarette smoking will be hard to do, many civilians argue a good reason to ban the drug is because of all the lives that tobacco takes. Many places and manufacture companies have already banned and discourage tobacco use on their property due to the dangerous effects tobacco causes. The effects are smoking are very hazardous and causes many diseases. Clinical directors and Health Initiative Programs explain the causes and effects cigarette smoking causes. The ultimate goal is to have the world free

To protect non-smokers from the detrimental effects of second-hand smoke, policies such as banning smoking in public places have been enacted in most democratic jurisdictions (Dennison, 2012). In agreement with the ANS (2016), it can therefore be concluded that the creation of such policies is necessary as well as ethical. The policies are effective in a number of ways such as obligating parents to be role models to children even when the effects of Erickson’s Developmental Stages are acting on them. For instance, when parents adhere to the policies of not smoking in public and hence the presence of children, the children will tend to avoid smoking as an unacceptable habit but instead participate in health-beneficial activities (McLeod, 2013). Equally effective self-imposed restrictions would involve high level of self-discipline. For example, one may start by undergoing a comprehensive medical check-up to find out their health status. Then, they can embark on healthy lifestyles to maintain or improve their health and act as role

The laws are a Social Contract. In http://www.dictionary.com/browse/social-contract we can find that social Contract is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which, according to any of various theories, as of Hobbes, Locke, or Rousseau, organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members. In Brazil, we also have a law that has banned smoking in all indoor common spaces, public or private, such as restaurants, clubs, residential building halls and clubs. I agree with this law, although the smokers, 15% of the population, claim that they have the right to smoke, the law protects the no smokers not only against the unpleasant smoke and smell of cigarettes, and also take care of the public health. Certainly smoking causes illness, and people who do not have the addiction of smoking are also victims of such diseases when involuntarily inhale the cigarette smoke.

Smoking is an activity in the society that has become a serious topic as it causes health problems to both smokers and passive smokers due to the inhalation of tobacco. Consequently, the most visible alternative for the legislators and other institutions in various countries is the banning of smoking in public. Smoking is not only a social habit that does harm non-smokers but it also takes away their freedom from being forced to inhale the contents of the cigarettes. Nowadays, many developed countries around the world enacted laws and established rules against smoking in public areas as a consequence of effecting "second smokers" especially children and babies. Banning should be considered the possible solution to this problem.

As a medical student who places a premium on health, I mull over this frequently and find it hard to understand why these individuals put themselves at serious health risks for a few moments of perceived relief and pleasure daily. A complete ban that would eliminate the harm inflicted on smokers and non-smokers alike has repeatedly crossed my mind but I was equally mindful about restriction on individual freedom. I thought embarking on this assignment would feed my interests surrounding tobacco-related ethical issues. Although my previous group project covered the ethics capability, it yielded disappointing results and I felt a compelling need to challenge myself with ethical issues yet again. This assignment presented the perfect

Freedom is a value that people have and want to retain. When Brimelow makes this argument about smoking look like an attack on freedom, people are likely to join forces with him. The facts found throughout the paper are worthy support to Brimelow’s main point, but compared to appealing to these values of people, it is merely an added influence.

“Smoking has become so nearly universal among men, the few nonsmokers are practically ignored and their rights trampled upon” (John Harvey Kellogg, Hirschfelder 146) An occurrence that happens daily for many people is choking on a cloud of smoke, tasting and smelling its acidic tobacco as it swirls through their lungs. Smoking in public has been an issue that has plagued America for many decades, so commonplace by this point that it has become part of everyday life for millions of people. Secondhand smoke, also known as sidestream smoke or environmental tobacco smoke, contains many chemical contaminants and is potentially deadly to all who inhale it. Yet, it has often times failed to be regarded by lawmakers as a considerable threat to the