Essay on Final Memo

On 05/06/17, at 12:28pm, I Deputy Warden N. Christian was dispatched to 3162 E 5th Ave, on a dog on dog or cat attack no known owner of attack dog. I arrived at the location and met with the caller Carrie Samander and her boyfriend complainant Edward Oryan. I asked what happened, Mr. Oryan stated that he was walking his dog (grey/white Pit Bull) down the alley when the neighbor’s dog (white/brown Pit Bull) down the street (3189 E. 6th Ave) got loose and attacked his dog. Mr. Oryan dog protected him by getting in front of him and defending him against the pit bull. An unknown male Hispanic juvenile came out and tried to retrieve the white/brown pit bull. Mr. Oryan took his dog home and Ms. Samander than contacted the Franklin County Animal Care and Control (FCACC). Ms. Samander stated that this is the second instance in the last few months that this white/brown pit bull got loose and attack her dog. Ms. Samander stated the injuries to her dog are minor but, that she will still be taking her dog to his injuries looked at. Ms. Samander dog had visible injuries to its ear, to the right side of its head and to the middle section of his back. I took

On 08/04/16 at 8:42pm, I was dispatched to 2087 S. Hamilton Rd, on a injury dangerous or vicious dog/injured dog, serious injury, involving a Columbus Police Officer (CPD) being bit by a dog and shooting dog. I arrived at the location. I was advised my CPD personnel that the CPD Officer that was bite was transported to the hospital and that the dog was still breathing. I was escorted to the area where the dog was. The dog was on the ground, next to the dog was dog owner Jackie Fate. I was unable to see any visible injuries to the dog, the dog had shallow breathing. I asked Ms. Fate to wrap the leash around the dog’s mouth to prevent the dog from biting her or me while I placed the dog on the stretcher. Ms. Fate complied, I slowly guided the dog on the

Along a murky riverbed, long devoid of life; a lone roach scuttles along. It is often said that their kind are the only thing that can survive an apocalypse, apart from the ever changing shell of this rock hurdling through space and time. This creature, as resilient as it is fowl, may ever toil in peace; for it has no sentience or desires, and merely seeks to fulfill the simplest tasks, passed down and hard-coded into it’s DNA. Without want, pride, or a sense of being, it simply locates and consumes sustenance; in an ongoing cycle intermingled with periods of compulsive reproduction. A duty which has been the sole, simple undertaking of every member of it’s species for countless millenia. All around this creature, the land expands outward

The issue in this case is whether under Tennessee Code Annotated § 44-8-413, our client, Kevin Gates, can be held responsible for his neighbor’s dog bite injuries, depending on his knowledge of the potentially “dangerous propensities” of his three dogs.

On 09/11/16 at 5:57pm, I Deputy Warden N. Christian was dispatched to 841 Crevis Lane on a possible nuisance dog; dog still at large, threat to safety. I arrived at the location and spoke to complainant John Haywood. Mr. Haywood stated that he was going to his vehicle to put his daughter car set in when the neighbor’s dog came from behind him and started growling and barking at him. Mr. Haywood ran into the garage to get away. He contacted Franklin County Animal Care and Control due to the dog being previously designated dangerous. Mr. Haywood recorded the dog loose near his vehicle. I advised Mr. Haywood if he know if the dog was still loose, Mr. Haywood was unsure. I advised him I will need to check with the dog owners to make sure the dog has return home and I will return to talk to him.

On 08/26/16 at 1:48pm, I Deputy Warden N. Christian was patrolling the 900 Block of Heyl Ave when I saw a black and white Chihuahua running loose with no known dog owner around. I followed the dog to 969 Heyl Ave where dog owner Donna Hanes open the door and let the dog inside. Ms. Hanes stated that the dog must have gotten loose when it was in the back yard. I asked Ms. Hanes if her dog was current on dog license and vaccinations, Ms. Hanes stated he was not. I issued Ms. Hanes violations for failure to license and failure to vaccinate her dog name Tito.

On 06/20/17 at 1:50pm, I Deputy Warden N. Christian was patrolling the 2100 Block of Lynbridge Drive when I saw a brindle/white pit bull running loose in the area. I took pictures of the dog loose. I exited my vehicle and chase the pit bull to the backyard of a fence in house. I placed a leash on the pit bull and put her in my vehicle. The pit bull had no identifying tags to indicate ownership. I transported the dog to the Franklin County Animal Shelter (FCACC). Dog owner Devon Gordon redeemed the dog on 06/24/17. Ms. Gordon did not show proof of dog license or vaccinations. I issued Ms. Gordon violations for failure to license, failure to vaccinate and failure to control her dog name Baby.

On 05/08/18, at approximately 10:56am, I Deputy Warden N. Christian with Franklin County Animal Care and Control (FCACC) was dispatched to 4514 Starrett Court on a dangerous or vicious dog investigation (dog owner owner's address). I arrived on scene at approximately 11:25am. I met with victim Syed Naque, who stated he was outside his resident when a medium size dog (black) came up from behind him and bit him on his right thigh. Mr. Naque stated the dog continue to come at him in a aggressive manner even after he went inside the house, the dog would charged the side door. A next door neighbor had to get the dog to leave the area. Mr. Naque stated the dog owner did come over to apologize in regards to the incident. I explained Mr. Naque

On 05/08/16 at 2:47pm, I was dispatched to 5064 Blue Meadow Court, on an injury-possible dangerous or vicious dog, owner known, animal confined. I arrived at the house and spoke to victim Xavier Holston-Sims. Mr. Holston-Sims stated that he was riding his bike from the corner store on Cleveland Ave, when a dog came out and bite him on his left leg. I took a victim statement from Mr. Holston-Sims stating those facts. I then want to 4975 Cleveland Ave and spoke to dog owner Lisha Entingh. Ms. Entingh stated that she was not outside when the incident happen, but that her friend was walking the dog on a leash in her yard when the dog pulled away and bite the victim. Ms. Entingh house is adjutant to a corner store and her side fence door was

The goal I achieved was that I applied to Texas A&M-Commerce and got accepted into their school. However, I am still waiting to be accepted into their Nursing program. I have also been finishing all my assignments before the deadline. The only thing that has caused me to not reach my entire goal for that was these journals. I began writing them daily so it was good I made the chance for that, but I realized I should have posted them each day I was writing. The progress that I made towards the goals I set were, I ran a couple of mornings and for the most part I tried to cut down on the unhealthy food choices that I previously had. What helped me succeed on that was finishing my assignments ahead of time, this

The court in Morris found that the injuries sustained by the plaintiff were the direct and immediate result of the dogs’ actions, and although no physical contact occurred, the dog’s actions caused the plaintiff to dismount his bicycle quickly, in order to avoid an imminent attack, causing him to fall and sustain injuries. Similarly, our client never made physical contact with the dogs, sustaining her injuries when she was thrown from the sled, making direct contact with a tree. Although no physical contact occurred, the phrase “attacks or injures” insinuates actions by a dog that directly and proximately produces injury to the individual the dog attacks or injures. Lewellin, 465 N.W.2d at 65. While one might challenge that it would be easier to establish direct causation between ones injuries and a dogs actions through direct contact with the plaintiff, the statute’s language merely establishes an immediate implication by a dogs non-hostile behavior, in order to consider the dogs actions be covered under the language of "or injures. While there was no physical contact between Staycia and the sled dog’s, the dogs quick, veering off the fairly narrow path into the woods, caused Staycia to be thrown through the air, against a tree, invoking a direct and immediate result of the dogs actions of upsetting the sled. These facts invoke the statute’s

Abstract Eugene Flegm has a long history in the field of accounting. He has seen a lot over the years and has come up with four paradoxes which accountants deal with. Of the four paradoxes, two of them have a direct correlation with leadership and management. The paradox of balancing “soft” skills and technical skills is the first paradox. The paradox of the education of accountants is the second paradox that deals with leadership and management. This essay will consist of defending Flegm's paradoxes while bringing in other sources to help the argument.

Six months ago, almost to the day, my best friend and her new puppy were attacked. She was dog sitting her grandmother’s Mastiff, whom at the time had no previous violent history. She kept the Mastiff and her puppy in separate rooms in order to make sure there were no problems, but that wasn’t enough. One day, out of nowhere, the Mastiff broke down the door separating them and went on a full-fledged attack toward the puppy. My friend tried to make it out of the door of the house, but to no avail. The Mastiff bit her by the arm and dragged her to the ground forcing the puppy

When a dog that has bitten someone before is set loose again due to the carelessness of his owner, we don’t just hold the dog accountable. We blame the owner. From a legal standpoint, it wasn’t the madness of the dog that caused the damages; it was the owner’s negligence. In the case of Joshua Martin v. Six Flags Over Georgia, Six Flags was the owner and their gang affiliated employees were the mad dogs. On July 3, 2007, Six Flags’ security allowed these employees, along with a plethora of other gang members, back into the amusement park after terrorizing an innocent family,which eventually led to the attack on Martin along with his brother and cousin. Because of Six Flags’ negligent actions and lack of immediate response to this life threatening situation, Martin sustained permanent brain damage leaving him in a coma for more than a week.

The court will likely find that Rocco biting Jeff on Ava’s property does not make Ava the owner of Rocco under the Illinois Animal Control Act. In the Illinois Animal Control Act, a dog owner can be held liable for injuries if the dog attacks when not provoked and the injured was peacefully and lawfully on the premises. 510 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/16 (LexisNexis, Lexis Advance through Pub. Act. 99-622, except for portions of Pub. Act. 99-576, Pub. Act. 99-585, Pub. Act. 99-604, and Pub. Act. 99-609 of the 2016 Reg. Legis. Sess.). According to the statue, “owner means any person having a right of property in an animal, or keeps or harbors an animal, or who has it in his care, or acts as its custodian, or knowingly permits a dog to remain on any premises occupied by him or her”. 510 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/2.16 (LexisNexis, Lexis Advance through Pub. Act. 99-904, except for portions of Pub. Act. 99-576, 585, 604, 622, 642, 648, 669, 674, 703, 711, 719, 720, 732, 744, 757, 758, 763, 773, 775, 788, 796, 801, 802, 817, 822, 841, 848, 860, 864, 874, 876, 881, 889, 892, 893, 894, and 901 of the 2016 Reg. Legis. Sess.). To be determined to be the owner by the jury, the person needs to provide some degree of care or custody or voluntarily assume care or control or have property interest in the animal. VanPlew v. Riccio, 739 N.E.2d 1023, 1026 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000); Docherty v. Sadler, 689 N.E.2d 332, 334 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997); Goennenwein by Goennenwein v. Rasof, 695 N.E.2d 541,