Final Mgi Team

There are a large variety of team types and different studies distinguish them by certain characteristics such as the team's timespan, work cycle, and the nature of tasks among many others. For example, Torrington et al. (2002) differentiate the teams by their timespan (temporary or permanent), range of skills, and a task. They identify the four team types:

The video defines team as, “A group of workers with a shared mission and vision and collective responsibilities. A team shares or rotates leadership roles. Team members are accountable for one another and measure their effectiveness by assessing the output of their collective labours” (Chapter 18 Teamwork at Cold Stone Creamery)

For me, I like to define a team as a group of people who have a same goal that come together to reach that goal and make it a reality. Whether people know it or not they always live and share their life with others as a team. There are family members at their home, work colleagues at their workplace, and teammates in their sport team. There is a team in a relationship. It is something we all need to be

The root cause of MGI’s process problems are a lack of direction and clear personal responsibilities. When looking at the team meetings it is very clear that there was little organization to their efforts. It also seemed as though there was not sufficient purpose to the team’s efforts. Many members were more interested in validating their ideas on what to do to others rather than exchanging ideas or creating an open environment. Quiet often there would be time spent on one topic, then another, then more and more without resolving the first topic. The arguments between Sasha and Dana, the HBS students and the musicians, and

Conflict arises from various sources in the team setting (Capozzoli, 1995). The most common causes of conflict are values, attitudes, needs, expectations, perceptions, resources, and personalities. As we are all raised with different values, morals come into play when the team issue deals directly or indirectly with ones values, morals, or ethics. Conflicting attitudes can bring about problems as two or more team members prove to have differing goals in mind. Individual needs can cause rifts within a team when they are not satisfied. The expectations of team members are not the same on how the goal will be met. We all have different perceptions of life situation and interpret them differently. The lack of resources needed to complete a task can cause conflict. Differing personalities play a major role in team conflict.

A team is something more than a collection of individuals. Teamwork is a group of people working together to achieve the same goal. The whole is more than a sum of the parts. A team can be identified by evidence of some or all of the following:

Conflict Levels – Effective teams maintain a perfect level of negative and positive conflicts. At times disagreement is encouraged to lessen the likelihood of groupthink.

Teamwork is essential for competing in today's global arena, where individual perfection is not as desirable as a high level of collective performance. In knowledge based enterprises, teams are the norm rather than the exception. A critical feature of these teams is that they have a significant degree of empowerment, or decision-making authority. There are many different kinds of teams:

Teams are more than just groups of people assembled in the same area, they are a collection of individuals dedicated to a common purpose and with a series of detailed performance targets, working together with complementary skills. Teams of people are encountered in various scenarios, not just in the workplace, but also throughout life, such as sports, associations, charities and voluntary services.

The brewers at Springfield international are a team although this is specifically the original members. The two new members Peter and John are at the forming stage of a team and could be considered to be part of a group due to the fact they are working with different methods but towards the same goals. Dr R. M Belbin Defined a team as:

How teams differ from groups: Team members work together toward a common objectives and purpose and share responsibility for the team's success. If team gets success all team members get credit for the success. If team fail to get expected result that consider the failure of the team. A group is consisting of two or more individuals that share common interests or characteristics, and its members identify with each other due to similar attributes. Groups can range greatly in sizes and capacity. Teams and groups are different to each other in five ways: task directions or aims, motives, connection with other team members, formal shape, and awareness among members.

The dynamics of a team relies heavily on the interaction of team members during times of conflict not just during times of agreement. Often groups seek to achieve a cohesive relationship in an effort to unite the team towards its goals. Group members can make the mistake of subverting conflict in an attempt to maintain this team unity. Conflict serves a valuable role in effective group interactions that must be understood by participants of a team. An examination into the characteristics of conflict and cohesion and the relationship between the two dynamics can provide perspective to

"Team" as defined by DeJanasz, Dowd and Schneider (2001) "[I]s a formal work group consisting of people who work together intensely to achieve a common group goal" (p. 310).

There can be many factors that play a role, when conflict arises within a team. Often there can be

To fully discuss this topic, we must start with a simple definition of a team. Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith define a team in their best-selling book The Wisdom of Teams (Harper Business Essentials 1994), as