Final

3. Using the cash flow indicator and investment valuation ratios, discuss which company is more likely to have satisfied stockholders.

The total revenue for PepsiCo, Inc in 2005 and 2004 were $32,562 and $29,261. PepsiCo, Inc had a considerable amount of net revenue in 2005 compared to 2004. The base year of analysis is 2004. The net revenue for PepsiCo, Inc. was 111.11% in 2005. The total revenue for The Coca Cola Company in 2005 and 2004 were $23,104 and $21,742. Both 2005 and 2004’s revenues were less than PepsiCo, Inc. The net revenue of the company in 2005 was 106.26% over 2004. The net revenue for 2005 was 6.26% while 2004 was less. The growth rate of revenue for The Coca Cola Company is less than PepsiCo, Inc. The growth rate of revenue for both PepsiCo and Coca Cola was 11.11% and 6.26%.

a) (2 pts.) Which strategy offers both Westinghouse and General Electric the best financial outcome?

In this report there are vertical analysis and horizontal analysis with these two companies. The comparison between the

Coca-Cola had a decrease in their debt. This indicates that Coca-Cola has a more solid business plan during this time period. Coca-Cola is also in a better monetarily stable place to pay back their debt.

Because The Coca-Cola Company uses corporate bond as the mainly source of debt financing so the amount of debt bearing interest is almost bond. Obtaining the information of outstanding bonds in Morningstar website, we have the list of Coca-Cola bonds as follows:

Such recognition is what informed its pursuit of the business and corporate-level strategy. One of the business-level strategies that PepsiCo has implemented is cost leadership (Ferguson, 2017). This firm usually prices its products at levels that are lower than the price buy competitors, such as Coca-Cola, because it can produce at the lower cost compared to most of its competitors. Furthermore, the company has the option of pricing the same level with competitors to generate higher profits. Through this strategy, PepsiCo has been able to enhance its financial performance. Moreover, thanks to the cost leadership strategy, PepsiCo has developed a competitive edge (Ferguson, 2017). The cost leadership strategy has allowed PepsiCo to penetrate new markets and outperform such rivals as

A financial performance comparison between Baldwin and Ferris during a three-year period can be determined by analyzing the financial data of both companies that include their stock price, dividends, earnings per share as well as their bond ratings. This analysis will focus on why the trends and changes occurred, and ultimately how decisions affected Baldwin’s performance and their impact in the company’s overall

Coca-Cola is a leading beverage industry in the United States and many other countries in the world. PepsiCo is also a leading worldwide beverage company, but they are also the parent company of the Frito-Lay and Quaker Oats Companies. This makes PepsiCo a leader in the beverage, snack and cereal industries. As consumers, we have indulged in their products for many years. My personal preference has always been Pepsi over Coke, which is why I was very interested in conducting this analysis. Regardless of the results, I will always seek out a Diet Pepsi over a Diet Coke and so will many of my physician friends at Children’s Hospital who start their mornings with a Diet Pepsi. These personal preferences are what contributes to a company’s profits through net sales. However, the key performance measurement tools used are not based on sales alone. Calculating liquidity, solvency, and profitability ratios on a regular basis give us a better insight on the performance and overall health of a company.

You would not buy a home, car or other large purchases without researching what product offered you the most for your money. The same is true when investing in a company. Investors do avid research on multiple companies to find what company matches the investors' criteria. In this paper Team C will research both AT&T and Verizon's financial documents. Team C will compare selected ratios, cash flow and make recommendations how both companies can manage cash flow for the future.

Liquidity ratios measure the ability of a firm to meet its short-term obligations. A company that is not able

As mention before, Coca-cola has 47.3 percent market share in the country’s cola market versus Pepsi which hold 44.5 percent. Coca-cola is also the brand known around the worlds, which are the largest producer and distributor of ark colas in the world. Even in the current monetary crisis, the company continues to expand and the financial position shows that Coca-cola has a strong cash position in compare to PepsiCo which the long term debt of PepsiCo is so high.

Although PepsiCo’s current assets grew their current liabilities also grew, which leads me to believe that Coca-Cola is more poised to grow as a company in the future. I believe there is room for both of these companies to fix their financial status in these areas. PepsiCo needs to find a way to increase their current assets without raising their current liabilities and Coca-Cola need to find a way to increase their current assets while maintaining their steady drop in current liabilities.

The liquidity ratios are a group of ratios that show the relationship of a firm’s cash and other current assets to its current liabilities. This basically means that the ratios measure how well the company is able to pay its short-term obligations and how well they can confront unexpected needs for cash.

Also, Coca-Cola has very strong rivalries. The main one is of course PepsiCo, which is very famous all over the world and has a great variety of products. Thus, Coca-cola can’t afford its image to be damaged because if that happens PepsiCo will become the leader of the industry very fast. Right now Coca-Cola needs a new Strategic Communication Plan to try to overcome the issues.