Final: The Civil War. The Union Was In A State Of Exceedingly

The first major reason of the civil war stems from Lincoln’s “House Divided” speech. Lincoln gives warning to the growing rift between the North and the South, the Anti-Slavery and the Pro-Slavery groups, as evidence in ‘I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free.’ Although the antagonism and eagerness of protecting the Union is not shown as prominently as future speeches, we can find a hint of caution in his tone. He goes on to support his claims through the hodgepodge of legislation that is the ‘Nebraska Doctrine’ and the legal crisis of the Dred Scott court case. He politely refers to this as ‘squabble’ and speak of the controversy and moral implication that they have caused. For his part, it is easy to see the insinuation of the speech- he believed slavery was immoral and was wholly incompatible with the principles of the Declaration of Independence embodied in the phrase

In the 1780s, there was a question of whether slavery would be tolerable in new territories to threaten the Union. Throughout the decades, many compromises were made to avoid disunion. But the Constitution was not clear on this subject which created quite the discussion nationwide when raised in 1857 before the Supreme Court in the form of the Dred Scott case. The Dred Scott decision was an eye-opener to Northerners that believed slavery was acceptable as long as it stayed in the South. If the decision took away any power Congress once had to regulate slavery in new territories, slavery could quickly expand into much of the western United States. Realizing that once slavery expanded into those territories, it could quickly spread into the once-free states. Many Northerners remained silent on the issue, this very possibility was too scary to ignore. Northerners who had not previously been against the South and against slavery began to realize that if they did not stop slavery now, they might never again have the chance. The growing fear in the North helped further contributed to an ongoing dispute between the two sides which eventually lead to the Civil War. A couple years after Chief Justice Taney read Scott v. Sandford decision, half of the Union had seceded and the nation was engaged in civil war. However, because of the passions it created on both sides, Taney 's decision certainly quickly accelerated the start of conflict. Even in 1865, as the long and bloody

As stated above, the rapid spread of abolitionists in the northern states and the pro-slavery activism in the southern states, the United States of America was soon torn apart. In the year of 1820, an act known as the Missouri Compromise was passed, and slavery was banned from all newly created western territories. This passing caused a lot of tension in the southern states because they believed it was going to eventually diminish their industrial success. A few decades later in 1857, the United States Supreme Court made a new legal principle known as the Dred Scott Decision, which stated that African slaves (in the slave

To what extent did the Dred Scott Case and the Fugitive slave act and laws further divide the United States? Slavery has been an obstacle to America since the beginning of America’s independence. “… this incomplete revolution did produce, of course, was a fairly clear-cut division of the new nation into slaveholding and non-slaveholding states – all at the very same time when the foundations of a national government were being laid” . It was also geography and economic differences that continue to divide the North and South. The most important issue was slavery. The issue of slavery was pointed out many times by James Madison. The Dred Scott case presented three issues that have been debated throughout the country. The issues are 1. The citizenship of African Americans. “2. Status of slaves who had been held on free soil; and 3. The constitutionality of federal legislation prohibiting slavery in territories. ”

“’One section of our country believes slavery is right, and ought to be extended, while the other believes it is wrong, and ought to be restricted. That,’ he said with a touch of irony, ‘is the only substantial dispute’” (Oakes 140). People bickered whether or not Lincoln was doing the right thing by signing the Emancipation

The coexistence of a slave owning south with an increasingly anti-slavery north made conflict likely. It was formidable to decide whether such states like the ones gained from the Mexican War should be slavery or anti-slavery, which either way would disrupt the balance between the slave and antislavery states. This divided the Union and Confederacy even further. Later on, President Lincoln sought not to propose federal laws against slavery where it already existed, but he had in his 1858 House Divided speech, expressed a desire to “arrest the further spread of it “(Doc. G). Much of the political battle in the 1850s focused on the expansion of slavery into the newly created territories. All of the organized territories were likely to become free soil states which increased the southern movement toward secession. Both north and south assumed that if slavery could not expand it would become nonexistent. Southern fears of losing control of the federal government to anti-slavery forces, and northern feared that the slave power already controlled the government; these thoughts brought the sectional disagreements. The morality of slavery, the scope of democracy, and the economic merits of free labor versus slave plantations caused the Whig and know nothing parties to collapse and the free soil party to arrive, ruining the resolve of compromise.

The Southern states wanted to keep slavery yet, the North, wanted to stop the expansion of it and above all, abolish slavery. For example, in document three it states, “These Republicans claim the right to make a code of laws for the South, not only in the States, but in the territories, which shall control or prohibit slavery… If Lincoln were President… The Union would be endangered from that hour.” In 1860, Abraham Lincoln was elected president. One of his many plans was to cut off the expansion of slavery. Obviously, when he ended up going through with his plan, the South did not respond kindly. Their response was rebelling from the North. The only way they could have kept slavery was if they seceded. In addition, a quote that backs up his hatred towards slavery, Lincoln states, “we deny the authority of congress… to give legal existence to slavery in any territory of the United States.” Clearly, Lincoln was against slavery. He believed that it was unconstitutional and planned to get rid of it once he became president. In conclusion, the Election of 1860 was the final reason for the South seceding from the

The country at this time had different ideologies and ideas on how slavery should be dealt with, leading to the separation of the southern states. But right before that you had the

To start things off, I am going to talk about slavery. Slavery been around since human started peregrination the earth a long time ago, but started in the Americans in the 15 and 16 hundreds. Place of primary use for growing tobacco. Along the east coast and then growing sugar cane along the Gulf Coast and the Caribbean and also down in South America the slave trade, but Lisa Atlantic slaves trade was actually made illegal in 1807, but America still have an inside slave trade after that, and then slavery was actually on the decline. Until a discovery came along in 1793 a Northerner named to Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin. This made finding raw cotton in the serviceable Fiber is much easier. The growth of the cotton plantation economy across the South required tremendous amount of a slave labor. Although, importing slaves had been out of the inside slave trade picked up cross the United States. Also, the difference between the northern industrial economy and the Egg agricultural. South began to divide the nation.

“A house Divided against itself cannot stand,” (Lincoln). President Lincoln said this when he accepted the nomination for Republican candidate for the upcoming Presidential Election of 1860. Little did he know, the Union was already irrevocably divided against itself culturally. Cultural differences caused rivalries throughout the country and extremists took those rivalries and raised the tension between the North and South until the Election of 1860 led to the rapid secession of Southern States, and thus, Civil War.

In the early years of the 19th century, slavery was more than ever turning into a sectional concern, such that the nation had essentially become divided along regional lines. Based on economic or moral reasoning, people of the Northern states were increasingly in support of opposition to slavery, all the while Southerners became united to defend the institution of slavery. Brought on by profound changes including regional differences in the pattern of slavery in the upper and lower South, as well as the movement of abolitionism in the North, slavery in America had transformed from an issue of politics into a moral campaign during the period of 1815-1860, ultimately polarizing the North and the South to the point in which threats of a Southern disunion would mark the beginning of the Civil War in 1861 (Goldfield et. al, The American Journey, p. 281).

Similarly, the purpose of Lincoln’s speech was to present his opinion on the rising contentions about slavery and provoke the minds of the listeners. Lincoln stated in his speech, “I believe this government cannot endure, per-manently half slave and half free.” With his previous illustration of a house divided, Lincoln intends to make it clear that he believes America cannot continue in division. His opinion is that there must be a resolution, and it must be that America would be all slave,

Given the time-period, between the 1830s and '40s, chattel slavery in which black people were forced into slavery and held as property, this was the most important issue of the century for America. During this period, opinions in the South hardened and as inhumane as slavery was they believed it was a “necessary evil” and justified this method to be a good thing that should be defended to the death. To put their money where their mouths were, the Southern leaders began agitating for secession from the Union and advocated for an independent eleven-state Confederacy. Their goal was to spread their way of life which

Our voice, the strongest power and right we have as Americans. We can convey our opinion strongly and fight for what we believe. During this time, people expressed their opinions about slavery. This caused people to argue. The constant difference in opinion lead to fights and divisions among the nation, North and South. Abraham Lincoln (1858) said, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.” The difference in opinions lead to the secession of the southern states, South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas, forming The Confederate States. Lincoln lost control of his country and

“I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free.” (Lincoln, “House Divided Speech”) Shortly after Lincoln spoke these words in 1858, the Confederate states officially seceded in 1860. This divided the nation in two and began a civil war that would last until May of 1865. Although the cause of the war was later twisted into looking like states’ rights, the actual cause of the Civil War was slavery.