We are team Baldwin, and we used two main strategies while playing Capsim. We focused on being broad cost leaders, and we were aggressive. During the practice rounds, we did not do well because of our lack of knowledge of the simulation and also did not really take the time to make appropriate decisions. When the real decisions started, we wanted to be broad cost leaders; dominant in all segments of the market, which included: Baker, Bead, Bid, Bold and Buddy. We were profitable, because we were competing against the other teams in all segments of the market. For this reason, we were able to compete against everyone and had captured 25.75% of the market share at the end of decision six. Additionally, we used an aggressive strategy; one of …show more content…
At the end of decision five, we paid off some of the short-term debt and had a balance of $20,000. Furthermore during decision six, we continued to meet our customers’ criteria in all segments in order to capture the market. We continued to invest in R&D, sales and promotions and TQM and paid off short-term debt. At the end of round six, our company was very profitable with sales of $311,484,788 and profits of $42,887,086. Since our company was mature and well established, we issued dividends to stockholders. At the end of decision six, the company’s stock price was $108.73.
One of the few things that we learned from Capsim was how to work well as a team. We were able to unify ourselves and work through different problems and at the end become a profitable company. Additionally, one of the things that allowed us to be profitable and do well in the game was the fact that we focused on our company and not so much on the competition. After round one when we were not doing well, we invested all our time on trying to make our company succeed; we did not focus on our competitors. Because of this, we were able to focus on making the right decisions for the company. Furthermore, one thing that benefited our team the most was reading the manual the simulation had provided and becoming somewhat like experts on Capsim. The manual provides different strategies and allowed us to make better decisions. The manual helps students become familiar with everything
The board decided that the company should be judged on its ability to make a profit, gain market share, provide positive ROA and make money for our shareholders with an increasing stock price. Our target was a stock price of $38
Our estimated cost of capital, 20.81%, is lower than Ricketts’ expected return, 30%-50%, thus the investment is worthy. However, it’s higher than other pessimistic members’ expected return, 10%-15%, making the decision more complex and requiring further valuation。
Market live is an online game that helps to educate students in making real life business decisions and seeing their results. The game included five teams that were starting new companies entering the microcomputer business. They were given investment money to help them start their business. By using that capital to open sales offices, web sites, design their brand, and build their factory. Since microcomputer industry was in the introductory stage of the product cycle there was no previous history nor established competitors. The teams were given six quarters to get their companies up and running. In those quarters each team should have become self-sufficient and earned substantial profits from their operating decisions. The team’s cumulative performance
Along with capacity, we also made it a focus to limit the amount of overtime and second shift workers. This kept our costs down and our profit margin wider. We paid attention to our inventory on hand and made sure to not schedule more production than was needed. Towards the later rounds, we really seemed to grasp the idea of the game, which can be seen in our large increase in profitability. In the Finance portion, we borrowed money in the first five weeks to pay off our current debt. As the game got into the later rounds we began paying off our current and long term debt because our profits were increasing at a higher rate. Overall, we believe that our group had a decent understanding of the concepts as we finished with high market share and profits.
During this time, sales increased from: $7.11 billion in 2010 to $7.99 billion in 2012. Earnings improved from $2.84 to $3.57. While the total amount of dividends rose from $1.00 to $1.72. These figures are showing how the company has been continually increasing sales, earnings and dividends over the last three years. In the future, the management predicts that their current strategy will increase returns. As, executives believe that their focus on building the brand and accounting for costs will lead to net earnings of $5.20 to $7.19 annually by
One of success parameters were profits, though we did manage to make significant profits over the last two years, we did not focus on it early in the game. The profit parameter was considered as an average. We did not take any corrective measure to increase our profit margins early in the game. While focusing on immediate goals keeping long term goals in mind is also important.
The company ended in the last place, and we know that there are areas of opportunities. In spite of this, out of the five performance areas, our weighted average scores were above the investor expected standards for Y2015. On the other hand, we never meet the image rating score of 70, and our EPS fell
High interest debt adversely affects your financial well-being. It’s constantly pulling you down, making it difficult for you to get ahead of it. Even knowing all this, people still neglect to do what needs to be done to eliminate high-interest debt.
Sovereign debt can be characterized as the debt acquired by governments, regularly those of creating nations, to remote financial specialists looking for an aggressive return. Quite, this definition avoids a few different sorts of financing accessible in the worldwide money related market, for example, government debt to open foundations, private obtaining in global capital markets, and direct outside venture.
The Baldwin team was composed of the members Mary Armstrong, Shawn Williams, Chelsea Trujillo, Daniel Arensmeier and Brenda Reyes. Team Baldwin understood that its own success begins from a well-constructed strategy with a proper execution plan. The Baldwin company adopted a Differentiation Strategy with a Product Lifecycle Focus. Baldwin considered the scope of the Capstone business strategy in the implementation of the objectives of the company. These strategies revolved around the R&D, marketing, production, and finance departments.
Our choices led to a constant increase in net income over the three years. Short term debt increase by approximately 100% percent but steadily reduced over the next three years. We were happy with the positive growth of the company and the fact that we were able to pay off most of the initial short term funding required by the increase in working capital requirement. Overall the current situation of the company in 2018 is good, although the total value created is less than 20% of that created in phase 1. From this we learned that the value of the firm can be significantly increased more through a reduction in working capital requirement than through increasing the firm’s sales and net income.
Greece is a country in southern Europe, the country goes back thousands and thousands of years and would be considered as one of the most historically wealthy, and successful countries in the world. But in the last decade, things may have changed – for the worse.
This policy memo addresses the current debt default crisis in Argentina. Despite the fact that 93% of the bondholders accepted reduced payment due to the bankrupt of Argentina, the two hedge fund NML Capital and Aurelius Capital Management have demanded full repayment of the $1.5bn (£920m) they are owed, and have sued to prevent the country from paying back only its restructured bond . To relief the dilemma after July’s ruling, the financial sector should persuade the 93% exchange bond holders waive the RUFO to alleviate the current financial pressure over the next few months.
As if reacting to the tolling bells, high-yield markets sold off in July, leading to
From this set of problems, we can see that leverage is good for the firm. Leverage has increased the value of the firm as a whole and increased the price per share. Although the cost of debt increases the firm's risk because it increases the probability of default and bankruptcy, therefore shareholders will require higher rates of return on the equity they provide, debt also provides tax savings. And we can see that in table 4, where we calculated the total value of the firm as the pure business cash flows plus the tax savings. Another reason why debt increases firm value is the fact that it reduces WACC, because the cost of debt is generally lower than the cost of equity. Another option that shareholders can do is using homemade leverage. Shareholders should pay a premium for the shares of a levered firm when the addition of debt increases value.