Financial Analysis British Petroleum (Bp) Till 2006

The current ratio measures the company’s ability to pay its short term obligations with its short term assets. Between Coca Cola and PepsiCo, PepsiCo has a higher current ratio implying that is more capable of paying its obligations. The debt management policies of Coca-Cola in conjunction with share repurchase program and investment activity resulted in current liabilities exceeding current assets. From the ratio Pepsi Co suddenly had to pay all its short-term

A. Current Ratio: The ability for a company to pay short term obligations is measured by this ratio. In 2011 Company G moved from 1.86 to 1.77. Compared to the 1.9 Home Center Retail Benchmarks industry ratio, the numbers are below standards. Current Ratio represents values above 2 quartile industry benchmarks data (1.4 to 2.1). Current Ratio represents a weakness for Company G.

An organization’s current ratio shows how liquid the assets of the agency are by comparison to the short term debts that the agency must pay to continue its operations. This ratio is calculated by taking the assets that can be converted to cash within a year (current assets) and dividing it by the liabilities that are either currently due or will become due within a year (current liabilities). The current ratio, ideally, should be at

Increase in current liabilities Substantial increase in current liabilities weakened the company’s liquidity position. Its current liabilities were US$2,063.94 million at the end of FY2010, a 48.09% increase compared to the previous year. However, its current assets recorded a marginal increase of 25.07% - from US$1,770.02 million at the end of FY2009 to US$2,213.72 million at the end of FY2010. Following this, the company’s current ratio declined from 1.27 at the end of the FY2009 to 1.07 at the end of FY2010. A lower current ratio indicates that the company is in a weak financial position, and it may find it difficult to meet its day-to-day obligations.

Ratios of ten companies are presented in this study. The companies are all headquartered in the United States and the financial statements are the most recent annual financials for the respective fiscal years ending in 1999 or 2000.

Next, we looked at the Current Ratio, a liquidity ratio calculated by dividing a company’s total current assets by their total current liabilities. This ratio gives an investor insight into whether or not a company is able to meet its short-term debt obligations and be able to remain a viable organization (Brigham & Houston 87). Again Whole Foods with a Current Ratio of 1.9 times assets to debt exceeds the industry average of 1.4 and is ahead of each of the competitors we looked at as well. This tells prospective investors that the financial health of

The current ratio has slightly decreased by 0.7 cents from 4.2:1 to 3.5:1. The main reason for this trend, because the current assets contained too many accounts receivables and inventories, and even though it was no cash available in 2015. Therefore, it indicates indirectly the company liquidity was very poor. In fact, majority of companies expected a healthy current ratio of 2:1, which reflects they should be able to meet its current debts with current assets as the trend is satisfactory (Smart, Awan, & Baxter, 2013).

The aim of this paper is to analyse the financial position of Melbourne IT limited through the use of financial ratios, based on the annual report for the periods December 2012 and 2013. Financial ratios are useful since they measure a company’s performance and give an overview of the financial situation. Ratios are also used to analyse trends and to compare a firms financial figures to other competitors within the same industry.

Lawsons 2010 and 2011 current ratio are above the industry average (1.8:1) however in 2012 the current ratio falls below the industry average at 1.55:1 and than again in 2013 to 1.02:1. This indicates that the company’s ability to pay its debts is

Before beginning an analysis of a company it is necessary to have a complete set of financial statements, preferably for the pas few years so that historical trends can be obtained. Ratios are a way for anyone to get an idea of the financial performance of a company by using the information contained in the financial statements. Ratios are grouped into four basic categories, liquidity, activity, profitability, and financial leverage. This document will use a variety of these ratios to analyze the firm, Sample Company, as of December 31,2000.

The first ratio to evaluate is the Current Ratio, which is calculated as current assets divided by current liabilities. Halliburton’s 2010 current ratio is 3.22, which improved from 2.99 in 2009 and from 2.66.in 2008. This ratio shows that Halliburton has a strong increasing liquidity and is in much better shape than its competitors. Baker Hughes has a 2010 current ratio of 2.77

The ratio can provide early warning that a company is so overwhelmed by debt that it is unable to meet its payment obligations. This is also a funding issue, e.g. the owners of a company may not want to contribute any more cash to the business, so they acquire more debt to address the cash shortfall. Or, a company may use debt to buy back shares, thereby increasing the return on investment to the remaining shareholders. Although Jayadiri’s Debt/ Equity Ratio at approximately 1.5 for both the financial years is not overwhelmingly alarming overall, the company would be in a better position if it could address this by increasing its Equity and reducing its debt thus generating a more balanced/ higher proportion of

In a study carried out by Erdoğan et al. (2015), the study investigated that current ratio reflects to a company’s performance. If the current ratio is high, then we can expect the high profitability. In addition, the size of company has a positive effect whereas high liabilities has a negative effect on the performance of a company.

Current ratio of Company X and Y is 1.80, and 2.55 respectively. This ratio presents the proportion of current assets to current liabilities. This ratio provided a measure of degree to which current assets cover current liabilities. Since both companies have excess of current assets over their current liabilities, they met basic requirement of safety margin against uncertainty in realization of current assets and funds flows. Generally, it is suggested that a firm should have neither a very high ratio nor a very low ratio. Very high ratio implies heavy investments in current assets reflecting under utilization of the resources. A very low ratio endangers the business in to risks of not being able to pay short term requirements. Normally, it is advocated to have the current ratio as 2:1 (Baker and Powell, 2009).

Analysis of the firm by financial ratios enables the financial manager as well as interested external parties, to evaluate the firm’s financial performance and condition rapidly by making comparison of ratios obtained from the firm with ratios obtained from comparable firms.