The Fall of Krispy Kreme Donuts
MBA 6154 - Dr. Plath
By:
Jon Plyler
Luke Sagur
Introduction
Since its IPO in April 2000, Krispy Kreme grew to be a top pick of Wall Street Analysts. The company’s growth seemed unstoppable and Krispy Kreme was able to beat Wall Street’s expectations. Krispy Kreme continued to outperform until 2004 when some accounting woes were brought to light and analysts starting noticing other anomalies that indicated that things were not quite as good as they seemed. The firm’s stock price quickly plummeted from its peak and lost more than 80 percent of its value in only 16 months.
This case study focuses on the use of financial statement analysis, and other factors that an equity analyst would use to
…show more content…
The associates were able to carry on with business as usual but the Area Developers are responsible for helping to grow the business. Each Area Developers incur a one-time franchise fee of up to $50,000 then pay up to 6% of sales to Krispy Kreme as a royalty and 1% of annual sales as an advertising fee. The franchise royalties account for approximately 4% of Krispy Kreme’s revenue.
Krispy Kreme – By The Numbers: Financial Statement Analysis
Krispy Kreme’s investors enjoyed a quick return on their investment after the IPO. By the end of 2000 the stock price had doubled, then shot to a high of 4.5x the IPO price by mid-2001. Krispy Kreme was one of the new glamour stocks on Wall Street, but from the standpoint of an educated investor was it healthy enough to support the success of its stock? An analysis of the Krispy Kreme financials should give some insight into the health of the company.
Krispy Kreme’s revenue increased every year between 2000 and 2004, from $220m to over $665m. Along with growing revenues, the operating and net profit margins also increased every year. The operating margin increased from just under 4% in 2000 to over 15% by the end of 2004 and the net profit margin increased from just under 3% to over 8% during the same time period. The ROA and ROE though the time period were relatively steady at an
2. Starbucks enjoyed strong financial performance in 2011. The company did not explicitly attribute this, but with an 8% rise in same store sales it seems that either the consumer market bounced back, or Starbucks made changes that attracted more consumers. The company feels that it offered better products and a better experience at its stores. The company also credited operating efficiencies and tight control of spending for improved profits. In addition, the company continued its global expansion, which improved the top line, and used the economies of scale it generated as part of its cost control program.
Krispy Kreme executives no longer rush to implement new plans before the time is right. They carefully study each geographical location to make sure its market will support a full-scale doughnut operation. Also, management spends time checking out sites for individual stores. Potential franchisee and employees are required to maintain certain standards and are thoroughly screened.
Abstract : Analysis of financial statement of a company is an important because it is useful to obtain Information
Although all of Tootsie Roll’s profitability ratios decreased slightly between 2002 and 2004, the results appear fairly consistent. This Company appears to provide a steady profit and rate of return to its investors. Its profit margins and return on equity are slightly higher than that of Hershey, although both companies appear solid in their ability to generate profits. The stock price has also fluctuated less, providing a steady price/earnings ratio. This is another indicator of a strong, steady performance by Tootsie Roll Company, and stable profitability results.
Over the course of time I have been following the three stocks in the fast food industry. I have been following Starbucks, McDonald and Yum Brands. I have collected information on my stocks and their progress. In my research I have found surprising statistics on the three company stocks I chose. In my paper I will explain how the following companies’ stocks I chose and how they did as well as the reasons their stocks affect their current and future progress.
Hershey and Tootsie Roll are both companies in the confection industry. We compared both companies for the years 2004, 2005, and 2006 against each other and against the industry averages in order to make a decision about which company we would choose to invest in. The comparisons we used to make our decision were ratios for liquidity, solvency, and profitability. As a result of our analyses, we have chosen the Hershey Company.
When looking at the 2004 DuPont analysis, you see that not only has profit margin increased every year, but it is more than 2% better than the industry average. That being said, Krispy Kreme does not utilize its assets as efficiently as its competitors. This potentially troubling because of the fact that they have gone through aggressive growth in stores recently. Is this an indication that these stores are not generating the sales necessary to justify the investment, or at least as well as its competitors might be able to? Finally the equity multiplier comes in below the industry average. To us this means that Krispy Kreme does not utilize its leverage as effectively as the competition. Perhaps it would be to Krispy Kreme’s benefit to increase leverage and invest in order to increase growth and earnings in a similar manner to its competition. Overall, we believe that Krispy Kreme is moderately
The KK’s revenue composition seems questionable as well. Most successful franchise companies build their business around the royalty payment. KK, on the other hand, build it around equipment sales. Enlarging the proportion of the franchisee royalties and fees could not only help build a great image for the company but also motivate the franchisees to operate
The Krispy Kreme Doughnuts case study solution solves the case on financial statement analysis. The structure of the solution is outlined below and answers the questions included in the outline
The company’s financial performance looks quite good at the end of Feb 1, 2004. From the exhibit 1, income statement, we can see that Krispy Kreme was growing from the year ended Jan 30, 2000 to the year ended Feb 1, 2004. Total revenue increased significantly 202% from US$ 220,243 thousands in Jan 30, 2000 to US$ 665,592 thousands in Feb 1, 2004. Net income increased 858% from US$ 5,956 in Jan 30, 2000 to US$ 57,087 thousands in Feb 1, 2004. The balance sheet in exhibit 2, looks as good as the income statement in
Strengths: Dunkin’ Donuts is very popular in its industry and has established a powerful brand and image through its efficient operations, low prices and the wide range of high quality products it offers. Moreover, the company experiences economies of scale as it has many operations worldwide. In addition they have significant bargaining power against their suppliers due to the experience they obtained and the support they acquire from Allied Domecq, one of the strongest companies in the market.
The company under analysis in this report is Dunkin Donuts. The brand of Dunkin Donuts originated in 1950 when Bill Rosenberg opened the very first outlet in Massachusetts, USA. Today Dunkin' Donuts is the world's leading baked goods and coffee chain, serving more than 3 million customers per day worldwide. It sells about 52 varieties of donuts and more than a dozen coffee beverages as well as an array of bagels, breakfast, sandwiches, subs and other baked goods. Dunkin Donuts is a subsidiary company of Dunkin Brands Inc that owns companies like Dunkin Donuts, Baskin Robins etc. Dunkin Donuts is a multinational company with its presence in more than 32 nations. By the end of 2011, there were 10,083 Dunkin' Donuts stores worldwide that included 7,015 franchised restaurants in the United States of America and 3,068 international outlets in more than 32 countries across the globe employing more than 9000 people. According to the financial report published by Dunkin Brands Inc, the parent company of Dunkin Donuts the net sales worldwide totaled up to $8.77 billion, up 5.2 percent from the previous year and the Net income for the year was $108.3 million, up 214.5 percent as reported by the company.
A shift in consumer demand to want healthier fast-food options has hit the industry hard. Dunkin’ Donuts and Starbucks have combated this shift by offering healthier menu items, something Krispy Kreme has failed to do. Dunkin’ Donuts offers healthy breakfast sandwiches and
In 2003, the U.S. doughnut industry was a $5 - $6 billion market. American households consumed an estimated 10 -12 billion doughnuts annually; this translates into over three dozen doughnuts per capita. In 2002, doughnut industry sales rose by about 13%. Sales from doughnut outlets rose by about 9%, to approximately $3.6 billion, whereas packaged doughnut sales at supermarkets, convenience stores and other retail outlets staggered in the past five years. A study by Technomic confirmed the growth of doughnut shops and identified this segment as the fastest-growing dining category in the country. Further analysis provided by the following figure shows attractiveness and profitability
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts was a successful privately owned business since 1937. In 1982 a group of franchises bought back the company from Beatrice Foods for $24 million, and reintroduced the old recipe of doughnuts and their “hot doughnuts now” system. In 1998 Scott Livengood became Krispy Kreme’s new