Financial Benefits Of Banks : Some Chilean Lessons

Extensive research has determined that the banking industry is in an unstable state. The industry’s profits have

There are various categories of banking; these include retail banking, directly dealing with small businesses and persons. Commercial and Corporate banking which offers services to medium and large businesses (Koch & MacDonald 2010). Private banking, deals with individuals, offering them one on one service. The last category is investment banking. These help clients to raise capital and often invest in financial markets. Most global banking institutions provide all these services combined. With all these institutions in existence within the same localities and offering similar services, there is a need to regulate the industry so as to protect the consumer and provide fair working environment for all banks (Du & Girma, 2011).

One of the primary factors that can be attributed as to have led the recent financial crisis is the financial deregulation allowing financial institutions a lot of freedom in the way they operated. The manifestation of this was seen in the form of:

The proposal currently has nine Republican signatures and nine Democrat, which means that it has enough to clear both the banking panel and the Senate if all Republicans agree with it. There has been some strong opposition again the legislation as Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown says, “it would do little to help working families”. However, Senator Crapo believes that this is the first proposal with a genuine chance of making it to the president. The authors conclude the article with two statements, the first explains that banks with assets between $50-$100 billion would be immediately exempt, and banks between $100-$250 could be exempt after 18 months. The second statement was from an analyst at Evercore ISI saying that he wasn’t sure if these regulation changes would result in cost savings because banks have been viewing them as sunk costs.

The banking industry has undergone major upheaval in recent years, largely due to the lingering recessionary environment and increased regulatory environment. Many banks have failed in the face of such tough environmental conditions. These conditions

While researching written articles about the effects of global finance crisis 2008-2009 on Brazil’s economy, I found numerous financial researchers that had published documentations in reference to the impact on the Brazil economy. In addition, the banks and government interactions to the global finance crisis 2008-2009, particularly research papers, financial journals, newspapers, pamphlets, and brochures. The Brazil government policies deal with a less openness, and its emerging economy enabled the country finance regulators the ability to initiate moderate banking countering measures to the crisis. These actions taken by the Brazilian government minimized the long term impacts of the global finance crisis 2008-2009 compared to more developed nations. My goals in this paper, is to explore the Brazil banking finance reactions, and government regulation policies that led to mitigating the impact of the global financial crisis of 2008-2009.

Many believe that if a company is big enough, then it will be nearly impossible for it to fail and go bankrupt. However, that is not always the case as the United States learned the hard way in the late 2000s. This essay will describe what it means to be “too big to fail”, and explain the benefits of having large institutions along with the problems that come with them. It will also mention the amount of concentration in the banking industry, the size of the firms and the market share they represent. There have been proposed policies that can help reduce the risks of these large financial institutions. Some institutions however, have challenged proposed policies and decisions by the Financial Stability Oversight Council that declares them as a financial institution important enough to not fail. An explanation of their reasoning will be provided.

There are various government structures in organizations although they are different from one branch of the government to the other. The structures help the government manage its economy efficiently. In the economy a too big to fail firm (TBTF) exists and it is defined as one that its complexity, size, critical functions, and interconnections are in the sense that in case the firm goes into liquidation unexpectedly, the rest of the economy and financial system will face severe consequences. The government provides support to TBTF companies not because they favor them but because they recognize implications for an advanced economy of allowing a disorderly failure outweighs the cost of avoiding the failure. Helping the TBTF firms enable the economy to realize high revenue. Various activities are to prevent their failure. They include providing credit, facilitating a merger, or injecting the capital of the government. The paper addresses the structures of the administration and the concept of too big to fail in financial and non-financial institutions plus the ethics involved with the theory.

The fall of Lehman brothers was the beginning of what would be a long road to recovery, one that we are still on in fact, the financial crisis sparked fierce debates on how the banking sector was run. Many agreed that banks had become ‘too big to fail’ and that they took on risky investments without any thought about the impact this would have on the world economy, this is because they believed they would be bailed out by the government. The question that has been part of an endless drawn out discussion, ever since the beginning of the crash, is whether big banks should be broken up in to smaller more manageable sized institutions. It is something that divides people, there are many differing opinions on how to handle the current financial situation we are surrounded by. Within this essay, some of the key points of view from both sides of the argument will be put forward, analysing both sides will lead the essay to conclude with whether banks should be broken up.

Banking is designed to make it possible for customers to trade, commercialize and invest. It can be regarded as a service to serve the public and prompt the economy (Rosenthal, 2013). There has been much debate concerning whether big banks should be broken up. The collapse of five biggest investment banks in the financial crisis of 2008 has put an increasing number of countries such as Iceland, Ireland and Spain at the edge of bankruptcy (Rosenthal, 2013) and resulted in mass unemployment and a decrease in living standards. It is clear that although large banks perform invaluable functions in economies of scale and scope, providing unique services which are not accessible elsewhere, they also know they are “too big to fail”(hereafter TBTF) for bail-outs provided by governments; therefore, they continue to take excessive risks for higher compensation, which could have a negative influence on the forming of a competitive and stable market. In this essay, I will look at the causes and consequences of the financial crisis and then argue that those reforms proposed are insufficient to reduce the risks of systemic collapse; Thus, these financial sectors should become small enough to be allowed to fail so that they have to consider carefully before taking excessive risks.

Even though the Bank argues that its presence has reinforced the position of the government, the reality is that is has subordinated and marginalised it. Most of the Bank’s programme does not involve the government in the decision-making process, undermining the accountability of democratically elected representatives. In the end, the Bank’s presence has created problems rather than solving them.

The chapter will provide the rationale for banking and its supervision. A brief mention has been made of the high level segmentation of banking, which will be explored further in the next chapters. The chapter ends with the description of typical financial statements in a bank. The description of the terms in a financial statement have been kept to a level suitable for an introductory course.

The phased introduction of new banks in the private sector and expansion in the number of foreign banks provided for a new level of competition. Furthermore, increasingly tight capital adequacy norms, prudential and supervision norms were to apply equally across all banks, regardless of their ownership. [34]

Banking, from its early days of inception, has undergone rapid changes, most especially within the past ten years, also as a result of major world events such as the 9/11 terror attacks and the consequential reactions of governments and within the industry itself. (Morgan McKinley UK)

The economy can be divided in the entire spectrum of economic activity into the real and monetary sectors. The real sector is where production takes place while the monetary sector supports this production and in a way is the means to the end. We know and we accept the financial system is critical to the working of the rest of the economy. In fact, the Asian crisis of the nineties, or for that matter what happened in Latin America and Russia subsequently and also Dubai Crisis have shown how a fragile financial sector can wreak havoc on the rest of the economy. Therefore the banking sector is crucial and we want to express our views to explore how this sector can work in harmony with the real sector to achieve the