Essay on Financial Management: SSGC Company

This is no surprise due to the major expansion that CC took on in 2001. Lastly, the long term debt to capitalization ratio slowly decreases which is just showing how CC is not being risky with their capital through debt.

MCI would be better to keep its capital structure of 55% debt. The cost of equity is high because raising more equity will dilute the value for existing shareholders. Due to the fact that MCI has a high leverage, it is not feasible to issue debt. Additionally, MCI has exhausted the line of credit from the banks and used convertible debentures frequently. MCI belongs to a competitive and regulatory industry. The high leverage will limit its potential to grow. In exhibit 8, MCI does not have a bond rating. The convertible bond allowed the company to raise capital and convert to equity later. The interest coverage ratio of AT&T is 3.6X whereas that of MCI is 4.2X. After increasing the market share, the company can obtain a bond rating by decreasing its financial leverage.

James Gitanga was not sure about the unusual capital structure of the Company, avoiding the long-term debt. We believe that the long-term capital structure across the industry was pre-determined by the high capital expenditures and steady cash inflows. Thus, issuing long-term debt was more preferable. Besides, by issuing debt they would enjoy the tax shield since interest on long-term debt is tax-deductible.

Debt ratio percentages increased for Company G from 28.34% to 29.94%. Industry quartile is 30, 45 and 66 percent, putting Company G below average. Debt Ratio represents strength for Company G.

The 20%/9% Bonds and Common Stock option does not generate as positive capital structure as 50%/50% option. Although EPS scores are the same for year nine, net income is reduced to 39,680 due to having to pay interest of 14,400 on bonds while the 50/50 option generates a net income of 49,049 and pays no interest on bonds and issues dividends. In year ten, both capital structures offer an EPS of .032 however the net income is 9,380 less than the 50/50 option. In years 11, 12, and 13, the 20%/9% Bonds and Common Stock option EPS and net income results decline while the EPS and net income results increase for the 50/50 option.

When a company is growing so fast, it is a good idea to look at how it is paying for the growth. A good way to do that is by looking at the current ratio because it shows assets compared to liabilities. CMG’s current ratio over this time period has varied a good bit: 2013 = 3.34, 2014 = 3.5, and 2015 = 2.91. What stands out in that is the decrease in 2015 which could indicate issues with the company. However, after looking more in depth, it can be seen that this decrease is most likely related to the company’s fast growth in that year and its need to finance the growth. In addition, CMG’s

The company is very careful with it's investments. AGS decreases its investments into the below investment grade securities ( have credit rating below BBB- ) from 5% at June 31 of 1998 to 4% at December 31 of 1997%. The company invests in below investment securities to enhance the overall yield of the portfolio. Investment income from below investment grade securities was $148 million for the six months ended June 30, 1998. This tells us that this company is not looking for the quick profit, so it does not through its money around passing on opportunities for greater rate of return on equity for stability and safety. For some investors this might seem as an extreme measure, because after all earning money on market is all about risk. But for those who investors who are looking for a stable and secure investment American General Corporation should fit the profile. Then again, getting rid of risky investments moved company's beta closer to market beta ( which considered to be 1 and AGC beta right now is about .95 ) was not such a good idea, because now with there is a more chance for the company to take a deeper dive with recession of overall U.S. economy.

The high EV multiples of SGMS indicates that its stock price is very likely to be overvalued, especially when considering its lower profitability and higher leverage, compared to its competitors.

SGMS has $8.1B of debt and $-1.7B of equity by 2016Q2, with a D/E ratio of -4.9x. The company recently named Kevin Sheehan, the former CEO and president of Norwegian Cruise Line (NCLH) as its new chief executive and president on Aug 5, 2016, the day of the quarterly conference call. Current CEO Gavin Isaacs will become vice chairman of the board. Kevin has a different background from the gaming industry but has experiences in dealing with high leverage. The big change of the management team shows the company’s intention of delevering the company as quick as possible.

Target Corporation is having a very stable financial policy and dividend policy. From the historical financial data, Target had debt $11,044M, $11,202M, $10,599M, $17,471M, and $19,882M in the year of 2005,2006,2007,2008, and 2009 respectively. The long-term debt/equity ratio rises from 69.34% to 108%.

2) After finding the results of Question one, it is evident that SDI has more weaknesses than strengths as of 1995. If you look at the common size statements, Table 3, it shows that inventory increased as a percentage of sales, which indicates that a smaller percentage is being sold. All current liabilities increased as a percentage of total liabilities, which indicates that SDI is facing more debt. Figure one also clearly shows many of the weaknesses of SDI. Both liquidity ratios are below the industry average. Although the debt ratio appears to be above the industry average, it is actually a weakness because it indicates that SDI has more debt than equity. The only asset management ratio that is above industry average is the fixed asset turnover ratio, the rest are either equal to, or beneath their industry average. However, it’s not all bad; Figure one also shows that SDI has managed to hold a payout ratio on dividends that is 5 percent above the industry average.

SRC offers superior returns on common equity (ROCE). This undoubtedly reflects the greater amount of debt in the capital structure vis a vis WM, and a stronger gross margin. However, SRC’s ROCE has declined in the last year mainly because a reaffirmation charge (40% of Net Income) generated in lawsuits and a possible violation of the United States Bankruptcy Code. We need to highlight the uncertainty associated with the reaffirmation charge; this means that the actual results can differ from the

The course project involved developing a great depth of knowledge in analyzing capital structure, theories behind it, and its risks and issues. Before I began this assignment, I knew nothing but a few things about capital structure from previous unit weeks; however, it was not until this course’s final project that came along with opening

The long-term liquidity risk ratio such as LT debt/Equity, D/E, and Total Liabilities to Total Assets all show a decline from year 2005 due to the repayment of debts. The interest coverage ratio also shows a healthy number of 29.45 in comparison to the industrial average of 15.04 indicating a high ability to pay out its interest expense. Such a low relative risk is not surprising due to the nature of its business depending heavily in R&D development and large intangible assets.

As the graph shows, the finance situation presented a fluctuated change during the past five years. It may has a stable growth from DKK 9933 million in 2016 to DKK 14928 million in 2018. Debt in this graph is assumed only long-term debt that is zero, which is the reason why the leverage is zero during the past five years.