Financial Report Adidas

Over the last 10 years’ gym memberships within the United States have increased from 41.3 million to 54.1 million. The biggest trend over the last few years is becoming fit, more and more each day people are finding ways to live fit and healthier lifestyles. From eating the right nutritional foods, working out and people just wanting to follow the latest and greatest trends. The increase in gym memberships and the amount of people working out leads to the increase in athletic attire. For this exact reason athleisure wear was born, it is the newest fashion trends were people wear athletic clothing regardless if they intend go to the gym or not that day. People are wearing it to the office, shopping, to run errands and other social events. Athleisure wear consist of articles of clothing such as spandex, leggings, yoga pants, sports bras and fashionable sweats. Over the last 10 years an increase in athleisure wear has spread at a rapid rate globally, particularly in the women’s fashion industry. Since 2013 the increase in athleisure wear apparel has grown by 14% and accounts for 18% of the total clothing retail market. With this trend still catching on, active wear is expected to continue to grow at an average rate of 3.3% annually. Due to this rapid increase in purchasing athleisure wear the apparel industry will continue to grow especially Nike because they are the market leaders in active sportswear. For that exact reason I believe that Nike is a

In the athletic apparel industry, as in any industry, it is key to stay in touch with the current trends in order to keep your products relevant. With Lululemon focused on such a niche activity it will be important that they explore other markets within the sports apparel industry in the future so as to stay relevant. We can see the company’s first steps in doing just this when they recently introduced their men’s apparel line. A summary of the athletic apparel industry’s external environment are listed in Exhibit 1.

more than sell the product. The athlete actually becomes a ‘human brand’ in his or her own right.”

In using Porter’s five-force analysis, we can discover how strong the competitive forces are within the sports apparel and footwear industry. The five-force analysis involves; rival sellers, threat of new entrants, substitute products, supplier bargaining power and buyer bargaining power, which we will explore to determine the attractiveness and intensity of competition within this market.

The fitness clothing market is growing rapidly. Customers’ new found inclination towards living healthier lifestyles has produced an increase in participation of people into various physical activities. Hence, the high levels of competition in the fitness and

An annual report is a ‘portrait’ of the business. It embeds a sense of achievement, as well as, future prospects into the minds of the company, as well as, its readers (Sanders, 1949).

The use of specific athletes in marketing campaigns really began to show promise when athletes like Jordan began wearing their own brands of shoes. The idea to consumers or fans of the NBA that they could wear the same shoes as Michael Jordan, and somehow play like him was an easy sell by Nike. Today it is now common for marketable athletes in almost all sports to wear their own style of shoes, spikes, or skates. An interesting point to make is that through Nike Michael Jordan eventually launched his own clothing line called Jumpman23 that makes everything from socks and underwear to winter coats. Even though Jordan has been retired since 1999 the Jumpman23 company has continued to release a new shoe every single year that are simply called “Jordan 24”, an increasing corresponding number to the number of years the shoes have been produced. The new Jordan shoes still retails at over $150 a pair even though Mike hasn’t stepped on the court in 11 years! After retirement and becoming the CEO of the Jumpman brand Michael Jordan has been able to court other famous athletes from a variety of sports to wear his brand. A few examples of the athletes include Derek Jeter (baseball), Dwayne Wade (basketball), Jason Taylor (football), and April Holmes (track and field). The wide range of athletes in all different sports who now market a brand for arguably the greatest athlete of all time truly shows the money, power, and influence an athlete can experience

The women's apparel market is highly competitive. With the launch of a new active-wear line from Harrington Collection's, more and more competitors will start to realise the potential value in in producing an active-wear line of their own. The active-wear market is growing so rapidly (expected to double turnover from 2007 to 2009), that eventually all of Harrington's competitors would likely be expected to launch a line of their own, relying on existing brand loyalty and high-scale advertising campaigns to capture market share and move units.

The sportswear industry is growing and becoming more competitive so the will be new producers and entries in the market with new ‘’aces up their sleeves’’. More competition in the market

Nike has revolutionized the way sportswear is sold and worn in today’s economy. They have found a way to sell gear that is made for athletics but is used in the everyday life of many generations. Nike has changed the social culture of many people. This is done through various methods of endorsements. Nike has perfected the art of advertising by finding the right formula of different ad styles.

Sport Apparel is a large industries with many firms such as Nike, Adidas, Reebok, Under Armour, the Gap, Athleta, Nordstrom, Lucy and Bebe store. Large industries allow multiple firms and producers to prosper without having to steal market share from each other. Large industry size is a positive for Lululemon Athletica. … This qualitative factor will lead to an increase in costs.

Similarities & Differences: Within the financial statement of Nike, Inc. there are tremendous similarities due to the consistency as well efficiency of the conduction of business. However, with these similarities is a fair deal of differences due to economic stability as well as the adoption product ideas and innovative methods that aid Nike to continue for the better of the company: by reaching new levels of sustainability as they enhance product performance, by developing, more meaningful connections with consumers, and by presenting their products in compelling experiences at retail. The annual reports of 2010 to 2014 clearly distinguish the letter to shareholders in the same placement but the content with each year are not similar by any means; within 2010, they created six new strategic geographies to focus their effort where passion and culture of sport are strongest. Nike pushed forward an aggressive retail agenda in store and online. Revenue at $19 billion the previous year went down 1 percent under EPS and future orders. Their income from other operation contributed more than $2.5 billion in revenue and generated $2.8 billion in free cash flow from operations and had $5 billion in cash and short-term investments on their balance sheet. Revenue from direct to consumer increased 12% to near $2.5 billion. Gross margins came in at 46.3 percent for the year. That was the year of the World cup, whereby they showed tremendous acceleration they generated in the back of

As shown in Figure 2 of the Appendix, a Porter Five Force Analysis makes it clear that the overall rivalry within the athletic apparel industry is medium to high. Because Nike and Adidas already have a substantial amount of capital resources and other assets, Under Armour struggles against them to gain market share. 8Also, private labels of retailers and newer sports apparel companies could potentially pose a threat to Under Armour, but mostly due to the fact that Under Armour does not hold any fabric or process patents. This makes it extremely easy for any competitor to duplicate a product or process with no consequence. However, the threat of new entrants is not too troublesome within the industry because of the great capital cost required for branding, advertising, and meeting product demand. Furthermore, the sports apparel industry is in the maturity phase of the industry life cycle. This means that each company included in the oligopoly must

The athletic apparel industry is also defined by a moderate threat of new entrants. As mentioned earlier, the industry is extremely concentrated, with large companies (Nike, Adidas, Under Armour) at the top and several smaller companies following. While the costs for starting a local company is low, as the company grows, it will become harder to compete and be profitable in this industry. The incumbent firms in this industry have the advantage of existing production, distribution, and supply chain processes. New companies would consider the large upfront costs of these processes while incumbent firms take advantage of economies of scale due to having the benefit of already securing a large market share. These large costs in turn cause the company to have low profits, which discourages new entrants. Additionally, the threat of new entrants is low because of the brand preferences of consumers in the economy. This industry

On a like-for-like basis, Reebok segment sales declined by 5% in 2007. At TaylorMade-Adidas Golf, currency-neutral revenues increased 1%, negatively impacted by the divestiture of the Greg Norman Collection wholesale business. On a like-for-like basis, TaylorMade-Adidas Golf sales increased 9%. Sales in the HQ/Consolidation segment decreased by 60% on a currency-neutral basis, mainly due to the expiration of the Salomon footwear sourcing cooperation agreement. Currency translation effects negatively impacted sales in all segments in euro terms. Adidas sales increased 7% to € 7.113 billion in 2007 from € 6.626 billion in 2006. Sales at Reebok decreased 6% to € 2.333 billion versus € 2.473 billion in the prior year. TaylorMade-Adidas Golf sales declined 6% to € 804 million in 2007 from € 856 million in 2006. HQ/Consolidation sales decreased 62% to € 48 million from € 129 million in the prior year. (Adidas-group factsheet 2007).The merger and acquisition has gone beyond expectation. Although there were reports of declining sales of Reebok in the North America in the early years of its acquisition but this was due to the currency-neutral sales in the Reebok which is now associated to the turnover. But in later years, beginning 2010 despite the economic turmoil in US and Europe the Adidas Group together with other subsidiary products continues to boost its sales.Such increases are