Financial Statement Analysis Paper

Another measure of a company’s ability to pay back loans, this time over a long period, measures solvency. Coca-Cola’s debt to total assets ratio is 35% in 2004 and 33% in 2005 compared to PepsiCo’s less attractive ratio of 52% in 2004 to 55% in 2005. Coca-Cola’s debts represent a healthy percentage of assets and in this case the lower the number the better. Coca-Cola’s debt to total assets ratio decreased by 2% from 2004 to 2005 while PepsiCo’s ratio increased by 3%. Were a potential lender or investor to look at these numbers alone they would prefer the performance of Coca-Cola over PepsiCo but there are still many calculations to be made and factors to consider.

Firstly, the current ratio is used to determine the short-term to pay its maturing obligation and to have unexpected needs for cash. The current ratio’s formular is, current assets divided by current liabilities. According to Target 10-K Annual Financial Statement report, people

Torres’ common-size financial statements also show the changing composition of Costco’s financing structure over time. The fact that interest expense consistently fell over the five year span from -0.35% of net sales in 1997 to -0.09% in 2001 demonstrates Costco’s ability to reduce its overall amount of debt during these years. Exhibit nine’s balance sheet portion supports this reduction, documenting an increase in total current liabilities from 35.86% of total assets in 1997 to 40.76% in 2001 and an increase in accounts payable from 25.46% of assets in 1997 to 27.03% in 2001. This signifies that the company’s debts or obligations due within one year increased, further corresponding with the fact that short-term borrowing increased from 0.46% of assets in 1997 to 1.93% in 2001. With an increase in short-term borrowing it is logical to expect to see a decrease in long-term borrowing. The income statement proves that this is indeed the case, documenting a decrease in long-term debt from 16.74% of sales in 1997 to 8.52% in 2001. This relates back to the decrease in Costco’s interest expense on the income statement, representing the company’s decision to switch to short-term and away from long-term methods. Furthermore, the decrease in long-term debt helped account for a decrease in total liabilities from

The company’s debt ratios are 54.5% in 1988, 58.69% in 1989, 62.7% in 1990, and 67.37% in 1991. What this means is that the company is increasing its financial risk by taking on more leverage. The company has been taking an extensive amount of purchasing over the past couple of years, which could be the reason as to why net income has not grown much beyond several thousands of dollars. One could argue that the company is trying to expand its inventory to help accumulate future sales. But another problem is that the company’s

Current Ratio: Current ratio measures the capability of the company in paying current liability. Higher the current ratio, better the liquidity position of the company. Generally, a current

Debt financing is considered the fastest and cheapest method of financing growth of a company, however using debt to finance accelerated and explosive growth can have his drawbacks. The debt financing option enjoyed by Loewen kept shareholders stake in the business constant, and reduced the company’s tax liability. As shown in exhibit 4, from year 1989 to 1996 (excluding the special items regarding the law suits in 1995), the increase in debt (from 79.7 to 1428.6) led to an increase in EBITDA (from 21.4 to 251.9), operating profit(from 17.7 to 195.1) and net income (from 6.2 to 63.9), and led to an increase in the dividends paid throughout these years (from 0 to 11.4), and thus kept the shareholders happy. These results have encouraged investors to invest more in Loewen, and have encouraged Loewen to issue more debt to finance its acquisitions, until they arrived to a point where the debt to equity ratio became too high due to lots of reasons.

Current ratio shows how well the company can pay off its short-term liability obligations. Short-term liabilities are debt due within the next year. Companies that have larger amounts of current assets are better able to pay off their current liabilities. The higher the ratio, the better able the company is to pay current obligations. A low ratio indicates the company is weighted down with current debt and the cash flow will suffer. The equation for current ratio

Current ratio is type of liquidity ratio. It is a financial tool used to measure a company’s ability to pay off its short-term debts with its short-term assets. A company’s current ratio is expressed by dividing its current assets by its current liabilities. A higher current ratio means the company is more capable of paying off its debts. If the current ratio is under one, this suggests the company is unable to pay off its obligations if they were due at that point (Investopedia, 2013). Companies that have trouble collecting money for its receivables or have long inventory turnovers can run into liquidity problems because they are unable to lessen their obligations.

The current ratio measures a company’s ability to pay short-term and long-term obligations. This number is found by taking a company’s current assets and dividing it by current liabilities. Below are Walmart, Inc.’s and Costco Wholesale Corporation’s current ratio for the 2015 and 2016 fiscal year end. The industry average is also included for comparison.

In 2005, the County of Santa Barbara adopted three key values as “guidepost” to direct County employees’ interactions with each other and the public. These three values are Accountability; Customer-Focus; and Efficiency (ACE). The objective of the ACE model is to strengthen the organization’s ability to deliver excellent customer service to the Santa Barbara community. To meet this goal, it requires both policies and the personal commitment by employees at all levels to implement these three values every day.

In this paper I will identify the four basic financial statements, discuss how they are interrelated with each other, and why they are useful to managers, investors, creditors, and employees.

This Income Statement also known as the Earnings Statements or statement of operation, is one of the four Financial Statement used by accountants, business owner’s, and investors. The Income Statement provides a detailed look into how profitable a business has been over a designated period of time.

The long-term liquidity risk ratio such as LT debt/Equity, D/E, and Total Liabilities to Total Assets all show a decline from year 2005 due to the repayment of debts. The interest coverage ratio also shows a healthy number of 29.45 in comparison to the industrial average of 15.04 indicating a high ability to pay out its interest expense. Such a low relative risk is not surprising due to the nature of its business depending heavily in R&D development and large intangible assets.

quantity of net income dollars of company earned for each dollar invested by the owners was 8.5% in 2010 and 10.4% in 2011 reflecting an increase of 1.9%. After analyzing the solvency ratios the following highlights were found: Riordan’s debt of totals assets ratio indicates company’s capability to survive losses without spoiling the interests of creditors. For 2010 was 14% and during 2011 was 29.4%, showing an increase of risk of 15.4% (higher the number, higher the risk that leads the company to be unable to meet its maturing obligations). The company’s time’s interest earned ratio that determines company’s capability to meet interest payments as they come due was 26.9 in 2010 and 8.3 in 2011. A high ratio on times interest earned may lead to investors to think that a company has an undesirable lack of debt or is paying down too much debt with earnings that could be used for other projects (Investopedia, 2013). Subsequently evaluating our performance and efficiently of the collected data, it reveals that Riordan Manufacture has displayed remarkable progress in comparison between years 2011 and 2010. The company liquidity demonstrates that we are capable to

Current Ratio is the relationship between a company’s current assets and current liabilities. This form of liquidity ratio also shows if the company can pay its current liabilities. A company’s current ratio can be formulated by dividing the current assets by the current liabilities. In 2016, Starbucks had a ratio of 1.05, which shows that the company has 5% cash and assets that could cover all current liabilities, thus it should not have any problems paying its current liabilities.