Financial Statements And Report The Illegal Behavior

With different industry definitions and viewpoints, fraud can be a tough issue for audit committee members to grasp for oversight purposes. The legal obligations of audit committee members have intensified because their standard duty of care and loyalty to the entity has increased in light of management fraud activities.

The auditors are not responsible for detecting frauds, however, our firm follow certain procedure to identify the fraud, as mentioned in the generally accepted auditing principles framework. The first part of the procedure consists of brainstorming.

Auditors should look out that the company may have the opportunity to carry out the fraud. There have certain conditions that will occur this opportunity

Under the Security Act of 1933 and 1944, any individual that willfully filed untrue statements should be penalized. Auditors acting behalf of the public’s interest should make sure the company’s financial statements are not misleading. All the testing and auditing procedures are to verify that the number on the financial statements, and audit testing should be supported by substantial evidence. When auditors took their responsibility for and but did not show their competence for work, they should be heavily fined because their carelessness resulted the investors making a bad decision. Furthermore, if the auditors did not take their responsibility and showed no work to support their opinions should be charged as gross negligence with a heavy fine and license taken away. If it comes down to fraud, auditors should definitely face criminal charges along with their auditing company, and their license should be taken away

No company wants to be expose to acts of accounting fraud. Fraud can take place in any department and at any position within the organization due to the increasing motivations such as incentives, pressures, and opportunities are major factors contributing to fraud. The following are a few types of accounting frauds: payroll fraud, invoice fraud, accounts payable fraud, accounts receivable fraud, financial statement fraud, and tax fraud. An external financial statement audit does not necessarily guarantee that once it is completed that the audited company has no type of fraud but it reassures the audited company that the financial statements are fairly

Fraudulent, erroneous, and illegal acts committed by a public company, usually at a managerial or executive level, have been a very serious problem for many years and have prompted development of strict and updated regulations, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, in an attempt to prevent these occurrences. Unfortunately, these new or updated regulations are not enough to prevent these acts from happening, thus not alleviating the auditors of their responsibility to detect fraud. Some methods that management and auditors can employ to prevent and detect fraud, errors, and illegal acts are: improving knowledge, improving skills,

“The financial statements are management’s responsibility. The auditor’s responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements. Management is responsible for adopting sound accounting policies and for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure that will, among other things, record, process, summarize, and report

In recent years, both domestic and abroad continued exposure accounting fraud, financial fraud and other cases, internal control has been a hot topic that people focus on. Accounting fraud has spread to all types, become a common phenomenon in the wider economy. In response to this, the recent discussion focused on improving accounting professionals (including accountants and CPAs,) of professional and ethical standards, to strengthen accounting practitioners and increasing the penalties for non-economic aspects.

This essay will discuss the ethical code that has major influence on audit failure and what scholars are saying towards auditor’s credibility and auditor’s code of ethics because when a company goes bankrupt the auditor’s independence is questioned and shaken (Moore et al 2006). It will also show what legislative body governing auditors are doing because users of financial statement are searching for auditors whose obligations covers: report of correct records, assurance that the financial statement is of true and fair view, company guards against errors and fraud, auditors are abiding by the rules and so on (Percy 2007).

Routine examinations, audits, or internal control procedures, do not reveal most accounting fraud. Only 20% is revealed by way of auditing, however whistle blowing accounts for most revealed accounting fraud. Financial statement fraud will usually occur in such schemes as: fictitious revenues, timing differences, concealed liabilities & expense, improper asset valuation, or asset/revenue overstatements (just to name a few), (Frempong, 2012). It is essential one be educated and thoroughly understand the different types of financial statement fraud schemes and the accompanying accounting transactions in order to better identify fraud.

According to Ronald F. Duska and Brenda S. Duska, the auditing profession has come under extreme criticism since the Enron/Arthur Anderson scandal came to light. This scandal took the financial industry and the business world by surprise due to the respect and value that Arthur Anderson commanded at the time and also considering the size and magnitude of the client involved, Enron. Arthur Anderson was one of the big five accounting firms in the world who engages in financial audits world over. These audits to the financial statements of Multinational Corporation like Enron are done with a single core purpose in mind, which is to express an opinion on the financial health of the corporation. These opinions according to the authors are very

This paper describes financial statement fraud (FSF) and how it may occur within companies. The reason of this study was to research FSF detection and prevention. Research was also done to determine any influences that SAS (Statement on Auditing Standards) No. 82 and SAS No. 99 had on audit programs and the analysis from external auditors. Thirteen scholarly journals were

The auditors are responsible in finding errors, cut costs, and improve the overall general accounting used by a company. The auditor is to verify company records against the information the company has provided. It is important for auditors to plan and execute the audit to achieve reasonable assurance.

Internal auditors cannot effectively provide an analysis on the company’s internal dealings as they are part of the company. External auditors, however, can observe these processes from the outside and then determine where the funds of the company and whether the dealings adhere to the regulations. Using external auditors in a company prevents conflict of interest from happening. Conflict of interest is a situation where an individual or organization has multiple interests and of those multiple interests, one could possible corrupt the motivation for an act on the other when the auditor has any kind of beneficial interest in their client’s performance. In other circumstances, there is also the threat of familiarity where auditors become

A business can not work out without an account system, which includes internal. Internal controls are used by companies to make sure financial information is accurate and valid. Strong internal controls are signs of a financially healthy company and protect the company’s integrity. Strong internal controls can also increase a company’s profitability. There are several types of internal controls that companies used to protect themselves such as: Segregation of duties, asset purchases, supervisor review, internal audits and adequate documents and records. This paper will discuss several topics from a case study about And the Fraud