Financial Statements and Geographic Locations of the Polaroid Corporation

Cost – HD’s cost of goods sold has increased from 1991 to 1995 due to expansion of production. Similarly, the cost of selling, admin and engineering has also increased.

10. Summarize all the accounting changes Harnischfeger made in 1984 and their effects on pre-tax profits and cash flows in 1984. Below are the changes that were made in 1984: Change in Sales recognition strategy with Kobe Steel - No net effect on pre-tax profits and cash flows in 1984; Change in reporting period for certain foreign subsidiaries - No net effect on pre-tax profits and cash flows in 1984; Change in Pension plan - Increased pre-tax profits and cash flows in 1984; Change in bad debt allowance ratio - Increased pre-tax profits and cash flows in 1984; Reduction in R&D expenses -

Revenue: Net sales between years 6 and 7 demonstrate a 33.3% increase or an increase in approximately $1.5 million.

Based on Talbots filing of the 10-K, net sales in FY 2005 were $1,808,606 compared to $1,697,843 in FY 2004, an increase of 6.5%. Operating income was $152,148 in FY 2005, compared to $142,115 in FY 2004, an increase of 7.1%. Cash flow from operations was 12% of sales, or $211,438 for FY 2005, compared to $155,223 for FY 2004. Total revenues for the year rose 7% to approximately $1.8 billion. Comparable store sales also grew at a modest 2.6%. Comparable store sales were positive in each of the first seven months of FY 2005, driven by a healthy sales performance across the U.S..

2. Considering your answer to item 1, the first three exhibits, and related introductory discussion, is it likely that the accounting system may distort product profit significantly? Why? (Ignore general, selling, and admin expense.)

These number will be used for predicting future financial statements later in this case study.

From 1976 to 1982 the compound annual growth in net sales was 18.5% and the compound annual growth of after tax profit was 25.9%. Therefore, a 10% net sales growth shown in the proforma financial data seems reasonable.

a. How does Polaroid’s distribution needs vary by subsidiary in Europe? What are the implications of these differences? You must consider the cultural diversity of the countries in Europe where Polaroid operates.

Extraordinary sales growth for AMT of 30% annually is resulting in major operating losses, and external funds are necessary to be able to continue with this rapid expansion. The net operating losses from 1983-1985 were $1,289,000 in 1983; $1,176,000 in 1984; and $1,487,000 in 1985. The bulk of these losses were a direct result of both

Polaroid Corporation, headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts, was a company marketed a wide variety of instant photographic products for consumers and industries. After the deregulation of US motor industry consolidation of the warehouses in US took place, which resulted in an improved service level and reduced costs. Overwhelmed by the consolidation results, the management wanted to consolidate the subsidiaries’ warehouses in the Europe to a direct distribution.

The productive assets of property, plant, and equipment changed dramatically in 1996 they were 5,581 to 2010 an increase to 21,706. In total current assets there was a increase in 1996 from 5,910 to in 2010 21,579. Another significant change is in long term debt in 1996 of 1,116 to in 2010 an increase to 14,041. Also an important figure to note is in the retained earning in 1996 they were 94% (15,127) to 2010 68%

Total sales in 1989 rose to $1.7 million in 1990 and over $5 million in 1991.

Net income totaled $97.8 million in 1984, an increase of 5% from 1983.when looking at the Consolidated Balance Sheet (Exhibit2), we found that the total assets grew 15% to $2.7 billion at the end of fiscal 1984 due to addition of real estate inventories as part of the acquisition of another company. The ratio of debt to total capitalization jumped to 43% at 1984 from 20% at previous year.

In late March 1996, Ralph Norwood was faced with the task of restructuring Polaroid’s capital structure. In the past, Polaroid had a monopoly in the instant-photography segment. However, with upcoming threats in the emerging digital photography industry and Polaroid experiencing recent losses in their market share due to Kodak’s competition, Gary T. DiCamillo, recently appointed CEO of Polaroid, headed a restructuring plan to stimulate the firm’s performance. The firm’s new plan has goals such as to aggressively exploit the existing Polaroid brand, introduce product extensions, and enter new emerging markets such as Russia in order to secure Polaroid’s future.

1994 Summery of operations: Sales of products and services Materials, engineering, and production costs Selling, general & administrative expenses Operating costs Operating margin Other income Interest