Finder and Maker Reversed in The Moviegoer Essays

Numerous directors have tried to change a novel or story to a movie, just like Joyce Chopra did to “Where Are You Going, Where Have You been?” short story. Most critiques will agree that the book is much better than the film “smooth talk”. Chopra adds a few parts of Connie the

When reading a book, sometimes it becomes easy to see that a particular place in the book appears time after time. Because of its recurrence, the given setting begins to bear the significance of an individual character. In Annie Baker’s The Flick, the movie theater functions as an individual character for the three following reasons: it exists as the subject of conversation for the characters; it helps a character recall certain events that occurred in the theater; it acts as a mediator.

To change a well-known short story into a movie is a challenging move by many directors. Whether it’s Tell-Tale Heart (1941), Harrison Bergeron (1995), or Flowers for Algernon (2000), most readers agree that the story version is more preferable than the cinematic adaptation. Film directors often change or take out essential parts of a story during the screenplay’s production. In the film Smooth Talk (1985), Joyce Chopra, the movie’s director, took the risk in portraying Joyce Carol Oates’s short story “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been.” In her film reproduction of the story, Chopra pitches a few scenes with the main character, Connie, about her lifestyle. The short story only summarizes Connie’s personality in a few written sentences. However, these changes are not the most exclusive differences in the movie. Even though the characters of Connie and Arnold Friend remains unchanged throughout the story and film, the biggest contrast is Chopra’s refinement of the ending and the shift in the mother’s perspective of Connie as her daughter.

Which do you aggrandize? The book Flipped is more admirable than the movie. Flipped was an exceptional novel. The book more corresponding than the movie for a few things. For one the movie was a little bit funny, the acting was sort of bad, due to this it was making it seem odd. The second thing to state is that the names in the book are more interesting and normal than the names in the movie. An exemplification would be Shelly Stalls. The movie transfigured it to Sally Stalls.

George Cukor’s star studded romantic comedy, The Philadelphia Story (1940), offers modern viewers a look at changing personalities in 1930s/40s American high society. The film stars Cary Grant, Katherine Hepburn, and James Stewart in a clash of cultures centered around a wedding. Macaulay Connor (Stewart) is a reporter for tabloid like Spy Magazine, on assignment to write an exposé on the marriage of wealthy Tracy Lord (Katherine Hepburn) with the help of her ex-husband, C.K. Dexter Haven (Cary Grant). While all of the characters present go through a dramatic change of outlook, Connor’s is the most drastic.

Stockbroker on the verge of turning thirty is on a quest. Set in 1960 New Orleans during Mardi Gras Binx, an upper class southern gentleman sets out to find out about himself. Answer questions that have tugged at his soul. Questions about despair, everydayness, religion and romance. Binx is stuck in a quagmire. He must break out from this cloak of ennui and find the essence of being. But how? How can people, a person with a soul and a world at their fingertips be so inept at finding what makes them alive. Can it be found in religion or on the arm of a southern beauty? Maybe it can be found in the surrealism of a movie, or the excitement of making money. What if an answer is found?

Lastly, Mary Lawson corrects the misconception that isolation is always involuntary through Kate's isolation of her thoughts and feelings from others who surrounds her. Kate's tendency to restrict her feelings characterizes her preference to isolate her emotions from her external surroundings: "No, you swallow your feelings…" (36). Furthermore, although Kate's isolation is reflected upon Daniel as he feels, "That there was a barrier somewhere…" (36-37), Kate's detest for Daniel asking her about her life shows the fact that her isolation is by choice and not involuntary: "…sometimes he made me feel…like some poor hapless microbe, under his microscope, where he could study my very soul"

It’s not difficult to figure out that almost every book with a movie made from the book will have some differences and some similarities. I can almost promise anyone that they will probably never find a book with a movie that is the exact same. This essay will point out some differences and similarities between the book and the movie “Ordinary People”.

Whenever books are adapted for film, changes inevitably have to be made. The medium of film offers several advantages and disadvantages over the book: it is not as adept at exploring the inner workings of people - it cannot explore their minds so easily; however, the added visual and audio capabilities of film open whole new areas of the imagination which, in the hands of a competent writer-director, can more than compensate.

characters are unique. Throughout the movie, the main characters do not realize what was going

(INTRO): The most crucial and pivotal part of a storyline is the ending. Oftentimes, a movie and a book based on the same storyline will differ in a multitude of ways. Consequently, the entire interpretation of a story is based on the ending. This concept is expressed in the intricate and intriguing plots of the short story “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been” by Joyce Carol Oates and the movie Smooth Talk. (THESIS): The ending of the short story is more effective than the ending of the movie because it leaves more to the imagination with its graphic scenes that emphasize Connie’s complex relationship with her mother and show a transformation in Connie’s personality.

I see quite a few similarities when it comes to the youngest members of the Binewski family. Both the siblings have what is considered, by their family, a normal appearance, which could leave them as outcasts. They both spend their days taking on the frustrations and chores of the other family members. They are definite people pleasers, which I imagine comes from their upbringing just outside the limelight. We have already seen the effect of being a family outcast has had on Oly and we are starting to see Chick in the same light.

The third chapter will mainly discuss Woody Allen?s The Purple Rose of Cairo (1985) to examine how a theme about cinema-goers reflects a desire from the filmmaker and the audience. The film fabricates a fantasy where the protagonist of a film called ?The Purple Rose of Cairo?, Tom Baxter (enacted by Jeff Daniels), ?steps? out of the film during a screening. He joins Cecilia (starred by Mia Farrow), a frustrated waitress and aggrieved wife who has watched this film countless times, and starts an adventure in the real world. Confronting the chaos caused by Tom arbitrarily leaving the screen, Gil Shepard, an actor who impersonates Tom, comes to persuade Tom to return to the film, while pursuing Cecilia at the same time. In the end, Cecilia chooses to stay in reality but ends up alone due to Gil abandoning her for his career in Hollywood.

The director seamlessly weaves five separate plot threads throughout the main story, all involving their own social repercussions and the consequent changes in the lives of all those caught up in the dilemmas they face. The film is filled with a rich

Whether you fancy reading a book or watching a film, whether you consider yourself a bookworm or a movie enthusiast, or perhaps both or even something else entirely; there is bound to be something suitable for your tastes and preferences. In our day and age, many books often get adapted into films. This change of discourse undoubtedly affects the way we perceive the piece. An example for a book that has been adapted into a movie is the young adult novel “The Fault in Our Stars” by American author John Green.