preview

Finding People Who Are Passionate About What They Do

Satisfactory Essays

Chapter 02

Case No. 01

Case Incident: “Finding People Who Are Passionate About What They Do”

Executive Summary

Trilogy Software, Inc., of Austin, Texas, is a fast-growing software company (with earning in the $100- $200 million range), prides itself on its unique and unorthodox culture. Many of its approaches to business practice are unusual. There is no dress code and employees make their own working hours; Responsibility is heavy and comes early, with a “just do it now”attitude that dispenses with long apprenticeships; Information is delivered as if with “a fire house,” and new employees are expected to commit their expertise and vitality to everything they do. New recruits are given a few weeks of intensive training, …show more content…

4. What suggestions would you make Trilogy for improving its recruiting processes?

Answer:

The present recruiting processes of Trilogy Software, Inc. is quite different from the other existing software companies, but it seems so effective in its working environment. In general, we can appreciate the overall recruitment techniques, but it may be even more standardized. Some suggestions about improving these techniques may be like the followings:

a) To generate more experience in the workplace, it can recruit more professional persons compared to the fresher’s candidate.

b) It can appoint proper personnel to work at proper work position, or division of work may be more standardized to ensure increasing work efficiency.

Chapter 03

Case No. 02

Case Incident: “Where’s My Czar?”

Executive Summary

In this case, we give the job descriptions which are closely related to this problem also we give the ideal of job specification for the person in this position. To perform this position candidate must be experiences more than ten years in manufacturing sector. There are many selection tools that we use in this problem such as Requesting for an application, Carrying out an interview and giving references. In this case, we think that the HR department of white house hired wrong person for the job. The primary problem in this case is that the management decision to give this position (the administration’s assistant

Get Access