Experiential Learning Simulation Game Essay

Decision-making in the workforce is a process of responsibilities used by upper management to implement, enforce rules, regulations, and maintain a successful environment. Decision-making implemented more effectively by making a plan, thinking it through, accepting more than one opinion and determining what is best. However, decision-making often utilized more effectively by opening doors of opportunities for a suggestion, question, discussion, and feedback. Although, more involvement helps improve understanding, utilize behavior skills and present opportunities for better communication. Everyday life consists of decision-making, the right decision may not always be applied, but ensure room for improvement and opportunity. Individuals approached decision-making in many different ways. As stated by (Jones, Graham, & Bateman, 2006) decision making is a procedure used to recognize a problem, weigh the alternatives and evaluate a solution in which, certain situations will require different approaches to become effective.

greatest number of major strategic issues. It is a decision making tool that sets the steps for

To close the gap between actual and desired performance, decisions need to be made. Decision making involves making a selection from among alternative courses of action. Implementation and evaluation of the implementation provide feedback into the next cycle of group decision making.

Decision making is one of the most important aspects in life and work because of its strong link to success and effectiveness. Actually, successful people achieve their goals in life and work through effective and efficient decision making. The decision making process is usually guided by an individual’s beliefs, values, and attitudes as well concepts. While a person can use various concepts in making decisions, they should be very careful to select a concept that is effective and contributes to huge success. Nonetheless, these concepts exist to help an individual become a better decision maker in the world around him/her.

In the Army, there is a process that is very useful for finding a solution to many different problems. This process is called, “The Army problem solving process”, which is a seven-step process to come up with a solution to a problem. The first step in this process is to identify the problem. Once the problem has been identified, the next step is to gather information. It would be best to identify the pros and cons of the situation. The next step is to develop criteria. This is the perfect time to consider a possible solution, which brings us to the next step, generate a possible solution. This time, possible solutions are taken into consideration and comparing each of them. This is called analyzing and comparing the solution. Finally, in the last step, a decision is made and implemented. Unfortunately, there are some potential impediments that may interfere with the Army problem solving process. One perfect example would be, “The Tyranny of Choice” which is when there are so many choices that may interfere with the decision making process. The Army problem solving

“It aims to produce the optimal solution by comparing options (ADRP 6-0, 2-8).” According to mission command, analytic decisionmaking is:

Additionally I would like to present, the following information which was located at the following website: Structured Decision Making.

My personalized knowledge and experience in the field of simulation comes from working in a simulation center within a hospital setting under the direction of the Quality and Safety Department. Providing a service like simulation within a hospital organization has come with its own set of challenges and barriers in trying to ensure that the quality and safety of hospital patients is always consistent. Because of the unforeseen issues like the way a simulation is obtainable in a hospital across different locations and everyday hospital dynamics between healthcare providers, has impacted the quality care and safety of our hospital patients and families. I anticipate that fostering a challenging and safe simulation learning environment would be

And are these games really just simulations of real-life? This would make sense since games now have real-life applications and implications. But all things considered, the difference between a “game” and a “simulation” is arbitrary and based strictly on one’s definition of each term. If the difference relies on how realistic the game is in its mechanics and play style, then Call of Duty might as well be called a combat simulator. Does a VR set such as the Oculus Rift—along with the still-in-development rifle-shaped controller and multi-direction gaming treadmill—automatically turn a game into a simulation? Perhaps every game is a low-stakes simulation of its real life counterparts. Pit, then, is a non-digital, non-profit simulation of stock market trading…that is, of course, unless one started playing for money. Then, does the inclusion of money turn a game into a simulation, or even into work? These terms are debatable. What is clear is the driving factor behind why games are made—beyond artistic expression, though not mutually exclusive of it, is the desire for profit.

Decision analysis is an appropriate method for this case study because the decision to be made is operations focused and not tactical, it is impartial rather than subjective, and it is repetitive rather than infrequent. Decision analysis looks to identify the most appropriate alternative outcomes and occurs at a give point in time in a process. Additionally, it takes the view point of the organization in decision making, opposed to an individual standpoint.

Therefore, at my level and the level of most operators is that decisions can be made without elaborate tables or brain storming sessions, we process information rapidly and fluidly since time can be a crucial factor in the

Generating potential solutions, evaluating the solutions, deciding, checking the decisions and communicating and implementing the decisions were the six areas covered during the quiz (cite). Decisions made at the strategic, routine, project/non-routine, or operational levels have different impacts (cite) and consequences if not managed properly. This paper will address each of the six areas evaluated, discuss the four levels that decisions are made and show my improvement plan to improve this competency.

Google faces the challenge of evolving management techniques as the company grows. As decision-making pervades all managerial actions and is a continuous process, Google practices characterize the strategic decision-making process of the company. In this new model, the decision-making process is guided by a powerful coalition acting as a team and also permits decisions to evolve through trial and error and incremental steps as needed, as Daft mentions (2007, p.299). Daft also affirms that this new process relies less on hard data as a basis of good decisions. This statement differs from what Goggle practices as mentioned on principle 9.

Some players who play these types of games have been proven to have better surgery skills than actual surgeons. Meanwhile, video games have also been known to teach people business skills like division of labor, supply and demand, distribution of profits, and conservation of resources. One can easily apply these skills to real life scenarios whether they are a CEO of a multi-billion dollar company or using division of labor when clearing out their garage with the help of their friends.

The decision is to select an action among a number of actions that solves a given problem, that prevents a problem from happening, or that forces to apply new ideas for development. The need for understanding decision making process is increasing because the complexity of modern organizations is increasing, and because the modern organizations' effectiveness depends on the decisions made by the managers. The question is how to select the most appropriate action to solve the problem satisfying all stakeholders.