First Amendment Rights In School

School boards often do not adequately justify their reasons for denying High School Students their first amendment rights. Usually, the

Schools are required to have policies and procedures as they safe guard the staff and pupils and

I agree with the Supreme Court’s decision of ruling the case in favor of the school. The school didn’t violate any laws or the First Amendment because even though everyone has the freedom of speech, you also need to abide to the rules of the school. If they deem something wrong calling it a “lewd and obscene speech” then you legally have to follow their rules. You are legally attending a sanctuary that has rules and laws against certain things, you need to follow them. Another reason is that these speeches given to the school were student-government nomination speech. Filling a speech like this with sexual innuendos is very immature and wrong. Quoting the article, “When he delivered the speech, many students called out, gestured, and laughed,

Third, any campus that does not allow students and faculty to protect themselves, violates their constitutional right to do so and leaves their institution open to litigation in the event that a crime is committed against a student or faculty member while on campus.

Some people believe that due to the First Amendment rights that we have and they do not fully understand that they can riot and assemble unlawfully. With the recent protests that have turned violent due to the recent Antifa movement this is evident. This group has become a threat against the law and order within the communities that these events occur. Their acts of violence and vandalism against communities are unlawful and whenever these acts are observed the offenders should always be arrested. Even in the past here in Nashville and other cities across the U. S. where protestors have blocked Interstate highways, the protests have become unlawful due to these acts that disturb the peace. The blocking of the highway not only puts the residents

them to maintain a generally gun­free campus if they choose. For example, if a campus banned

After listening to the presentations based on the amendments within the Bill of Rights given by the students of room 144, the Bill of Rights should be amended. The Bill of Rights consists of the first ten amendments of the U.S. Constitution and was established in the winter of 1791. The Amendments compile a list of laws and rights followed by the citizens of the United States. Although the First Amendment allows people to say whatever they want, the Bill of Rights should be amended because people should have the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures and should have the ability to avoid cruel or unusual punishments.

Public universities have very little say in what students are allowed to say or do so long as their speech and actions are reasonable. Reasonable is defined as, for the duration of this essay, that they are not directly threatening to any person or group, they refrain from using “fighting words”, and they do not take part in slander or libel. Any restriction of reasonable free speech by a public university is unconstitutional.

Freedom of speech is one of the most important parts of the First Amendment, and it applies to everyone-- even students. Every day, students come to school to learn about many things, including citizenship. In order to teach young people rights, they must have rights in the first place. Although students should have free speech rights, the school has a right to limit certain things that could hurt the students. In the past, cases have been brought to the Supreme Court involving student speech in school, and they have set the precedents used today. Today in schools, students have enough free speech rights, but their rights should include publishing in school newspapers.

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the exercise of an individual’s freedom of speech from infringement by government; the Fourteenth Amendment extends this protection to the States and local levels of government, including public schools and universities. The Supreme Court has held that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate” (Tinker). School officials have the authority to censor school-sponsored speech based on legitimate pedagogical concerns. The dean of students has not censored any editorials yet, but required that they be cleared by her before publication. The main issue in this case is whether there exists a legitimate reason on her

Should students' rights to free speech and expression be limited in schools? This question has been faught over by public and private schools for a long time. Many dont think it would be safe to let kids have full rights to speech anf expression. many also think kids would miss use this right. Others think they should be given full rights because they deserve thier first ammendment. Many schools are afraid it would take away the schools orderly envioment.

But why is this an issue? Isn’t it better for all students if the school is a calm and safe learning environment? For younger grades yes, for elementary and middle schoolers the focus should be on obtaining the foundations of their education, for high schoolers however, things are far more complicated. Ideally high school helps to prepare students for adulthood by introducing them to new ideas politically and socially as well as educationally. Allowing them at least consider opinions and ideas different from those they were raised with. For school officials to say that the right to free speech

The America I believe in is the one with rights. We have the right to go to school. We also have the right to vote for the president in steed of having a dictator we can choose our own religion. Any one can salute Old Glory.

Whenever there is any kind of debate or altercation, people are usually quick to point out that having their own opinion is their first amendment right. This statement is true, but a person cannot just go around saying absolutely anything they want to others. The right to freedom of speech definitely has limitations.

Perhaps the greatest cardinal sin that can be committed by our nation as a people is the restriction of free speech among our youth. If you take away freedom of speech, you are already chipping away at their freedom of thought, freedom of creativity, freedom of life. Despite what people want our youth to believe, everyone is free to thought and expression as suits them best. If you force students to withhold their thoughts they begin to learn they have nothing to add to the society, that their ideals and opinions are wrong. Of all the cruelty to which our children have been subjected, perhaps the worst is to take away their ability to say what has happened to them, to say what they know to be true, of