First Amendment Summary

Constitution's First Amendment requirement that the District neither establish religion in the schools nor prohibit students’ free exercise of religion according to pertinent interpretation and application of those constitutional provisions by the courts. Any religious characters need to conform to policy 8800” (Markesan District School, 2013). “Decisions of the United States Supreme Court have made it clear that it is not the province of a public school to advance or inhibit religious beliefs or practices” (Markesan District School, 2015). Under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution, this remains the “inviolate province of the individual and the church of his/her choice. The rights of any minority, no matter how small, must be protected. District staff members shall not use prayer, religious readings, or religious symbols as a devotional exercise or in an act of worship or celebration” (20 U.S.C. 4071 et seq.) (Markesan District School, 2015). Having examined the Markesan District School First Amendment related to this topic the next step is to conclude my research on this topic.

Since the Declaration of Independence was drafted founding itself on individual privileges and choice, happiness and democracy, a multitude of concerns have kindled the rights disputes that we see making law an active and continually growing and interesting area of interest today. Issues arose included women suffrage, civil equality, slavery, the ability to hold a religious forum, along with many others. And, though the context and times have significantly changed with these concerns there still remains a constant struggle between state, religion, and schools. Prayer in public schools is still a topic of conversation. The giving of religious gifts to administrators and the funding of schools through tax-payer monies are

What I think that the first amendment is that The federal government will do nothing to prevent the expression of thoughts to the ones which are interested in listening to or studying approximately them, nor will it do anything to promote or stifle the exercise of any spiritual religion. Nor will it save you the residents from peacefully protesting or expressing dissent. Which can also suggest by way of the first amendment guarantees freedom of faith, however, there are several other freedoms assured there as nicely. Congress is not allowed to create a "state" faith, or make any sort of regulation to maintain human beings from expressing their own nonsecular views. It additionally can 't make a law that would preserve a person from saying or publishing what they wish; it likewise can not prevent people from assembling peacefully, or from asking the authorities to accurate problems. the first change has five components to it; freedom of speech, faith, press meeting and petition.

The first amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of speech and expression. One particular form of expression that has grown in popularity is body art; also known as tattoos. This creative form of expression can be displayed anywhere on the body. It is because of this same freedom that I believe there should be restrictions on what and where a tattoo is placed. Some feel as if the Marine Corps shouldn’t have any tattoo restrictions. But I strongly disagree. This Organization has been built on so many great principles, like our Corps Values: “Honor, Courage, and Commitment.” Then we have our official United States Marine Corps (USMC) slogan: “The Few, The Proud, The Marines”. We have a reputation for being a professional, disciplined fighting force. Granted, society will always change. From the modern day fads, the fashion statements, to the personal beliefs plus the need to be an individual; we as a people can change in the blink of an eye. But should we allow that to dictate the USMC? Should we change our foundation because of our society? Although tattoos have become a part of the societal norm, in order to maintain good order, discipline, and a professional military appearance; restrictions must remain in place.

On September 17, 1787, the United States Constitution was signed by delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, who were directed by George Washington. The 1787 convention was called to draft a new legal system for the United States now that the states were free and colonized. This new Constitution was made to increase federal authority while still protecting the rights of citizens. It established America’s National Government. In 1971, the Bill of Rights were added to Constitution containing the 10 amendments guaranteeing protection for citizens. The first commandment consisting of freedom of speech and religion. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads:

American citizens, provided that they do not insight some form of disturbance or riot (see Chaplinski vs.

The first amendment protects the right to freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of expression toward government. In this landmark case Colorado wants to give citizen an opportunity to make laws through ballots which violated the freedom of speech. In responds to the case, the American Constitutional Law Foundation challenged the constitution of the “six limitations” enforced by Colorado on the petitioning process. After the discussion in both trial and courts, the Supreme Court granted order to review three of the six original restrictions brought upon in order for people to

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Many people today have their own personal beliefs. In a school setting, there have been many controversial situations that have been brought to court to help resolve individual rights. As National Coalition Against Censorship (2017) stated, the First Amendment guarantees of religious liberty include the freedom to believe or not to believe, to observe one’s faith openly without government interference, Freedom of speech encompasses religious as well as secular speech, but the Establishment Clause is where Thomas Jefferson described it as “a wall of separation between church and state”, because it has important implications for religious speech and observance in public schools” (Retrieved from http://ncac.org/resource/the-first-amendment-in-schools-resource-guide-religious-expression-in-the-public-schools). For this paper, legal issues regarding grading of assignment, appropriate of displaying student’s work, application of First Amendment to scenario, and conclusion will be discussed.

The “establishment” or “religion” clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution reads: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” (Education Week, 2003, para. 2). It is from this clause that the idea of separation of church and state comes. It is also the basis for much of the debate regarding the practice of religion in public schools (Education Week, 2003). One of the big questions regarding the religion issue is where to draw the line between separation of church and state and religious freedom. The practice of religion in public schools can balance these two ends by allowing students to individually

The right of freedom of religion provides the citizens of this country to exercise any religion. As mention before in this paper “Congress shall not make no law respecting an establishment of religion”. This means that the government can’t preference one religion over another, non-religion over religion, or religion over non-religion (First Amendment to the United States Constitution, 2010). According Isidore Starr this clause is the basis for our doctrine of separation of church and state. “Congress shall make no law...prohibiting the free exercise” (Religious liberty in public life, 2010). Many controversies have arose between eduction and freedom of religion. A recent court case that took places in 2000, Santa Fe Ind. School District v. Doe (docket #: 99-62) (2000). Santa Fe’s practice was not a matter of private student speech, but of students speaking on behalf of and at the request of school officials. This factor changed the situation from being one of true private student speech to school-sponsored and -endorsed speech (Religious liberty in public life, 2010). Another court case that took place in 1962 was the Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962), was a landmark United

Religion in public schools has been an important debate for a while, within school boards and the government. Stated in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,”(US Const., amend. I) Within this quote it explains that all people in the United

U.S. Supreme Court indicated that public school education may include teaching about religion. However, in this case the teaching of religion in public school is only with the intention of learning the history of

Religion in public schools has always been a controversial topic in the United States. Growing up in a public high school, religion was not brought up often. Prayers before sporting events wasn’t something that happened, and the only time God was talked about was during the Pledge of Allegiance. While my school was like many others in the United States, some public schools continue to leave religion in school, which risks the violation of the first amendment. Even with this risk, several public schools in small towns teach religion because the majority of the kids are the same religion. But according to the first amendment, this is unlawful.

Where is the line between freedom of religion and freedom from religion? What is my role as a teacher in a classroom to ensure that students are given their rights per the first amendment? Where is religion’s place in the classroom, or should it be welcome at all within the walls of public education? These are just a few questions that come to mind in context of religion and education when planning for my future classroom. Consequently, there are questions that remain unanswered when asked of instructors within the education program, due to fear of being incorrect or misleading. As a preservice teacher, I feel completely unprepared for when these issues arise in my classroom and have an uncomfortable feeling in regards of legality in terms of the situation. However, I am not naive to think that there is a definitive answer about what is right and wrong in terms of religion and public education. With this concept in mind, the intent of this paper is to create a descriptive protocol for teachers handle situations in the classroom that will neither suppress nor indoctrinate his/her students with religion of any shape or form.