First, Natural System Theory Essay

Open systems perspective also suggests that organization's efficiency is equally important to it's success. An organization is efficient when it produces more outputs with less then normally required inputs, and when it's internal subsystems have good coordination among them. But this is difficult in reality. Because there are some negative elements in subsystems such as miscommunication and hostilities, which undermine efficiency of organization. These elements cannot be eliminated as subsystems of an organization are also open systems and organization gets affected by them also. (McShane & Steen, 2012, p.6)

Likert 's System IV argues that organizations take on various forms to effectively (or ineffectively) achieve organizational goals (Miller 2015). Likert characterizes these systems by the organization 's style of motivation, communication, decision-making, goal-setting, control, influence structure, and performance (as cited in Miller, 2015, p.50).

Initial assessment is important in relation to determining the competencies an individual may already have, this will ensure that the individual is being taught at the correct level. It can take the form of questions and answers as part of icebreaker activities or open group discussion of

However, they tend to have a focus on certain organizational aspects making the modern organization system be a blend of the three major perspectives. Based on organizational science that was formulated in the early 20th century there has been an emergence of rational, open and natural system theorists that explain the functioning of the organizations.

Complex organizations can offer different challenges while trying to move toward the same collective goal. In terms of the education industry we will consider all the stakeholders involved to be our organization at hand. Lee G. Bolman and Terrence E. Deal in their book, Reframing Organizations (2008) point out that, “complex organizations [have] made most human activities

Critically analyze the organization from the systems approach. You should consider the inputs, transformation and output elements of the operation and consider how the system creates value.

Rational organisation is beneficial as efficient workers can perform more rapidly and easily (Ritzer 2008) meaning more work is done in the same amount of time, leading to increased efficiency for the business as a whole.

Daft, Richard L. Organizational Theory and Design: 12th edition. South-Western College Publisher. 24 April 2015

Communication is essential in our society today. There are many different types and methods of communication that people use. Throughout life, people learn to use communication in order to interact in the everyday world. People form groups to place themselves where they think they belong in society. Whether people know they are doing it or not, they consciously or subconsciously place themselves into certain groups. There are many different reasons for people to join different groups, these being for learning, activity, personal growth, and problem solving. Members of groups must all contribute in order to complete a task. People can have both positive and negative effects on groups. There are many concepts that

You might be thinking that this sounds pretty good. After all, being more efficient is a good thing. Controlled, consistent and measurable outcomes also sound good. So, what 's the problem? It turns out that over-rationalizing a process in this manner can cause irrationality. Which means that a rationalized system may result in events or outcomes that were neither anticipated or desired, and in fact, may not be so good. For example, McDonald 's chain of restaurants. Fast food often turns out to be just the opposite and you have to deal with long waits in lines. Fast food is not necessarily good food either, in fact, McDonald 's food is extremely unhealthy and the taste is average. McDonalds also has issues pertaining to the way their food is made, and also the amount of trash that accumulates from their process.

According to Miles et al. (1978, p. 547), an organization is both its purpose and the mechanism constructed to achieve the purpose. It means that the concept of organization is embracing both goals and all the elements that represent unique combination. Miles et al. (1978, p. 553) draws the conclusion that structure and the processes taking place inside the organization are closely aligned; it is hard to speak about one without mentioning the other. It is important to understand the conclusion drawn by Miles et al. (1978). It illustrates how the

Therefore, people like to have a system that has already been used and that they know works. However, this method is usually the only option offered in a society following the McDonaldization theory, therefore, efficiency becomes a rationalization. An example of this is a typical salad bar at a restaurant. Instead of expecting a plate of salad from the chef, you are expected to go up to the salad bar and serve yourself. This ends up with customers doing most of the work and in addition, customers usually pay more for this, which is a sense of inefficient efficiency on the customers part. The second dimension to its success is calculability, which allows all things such as products sold, cost, and services to be calculated, counted, and quantified. In McDonaldized systems, quantity has become equivalent to quality (Ritzer, p. 12), and therefore, this illusion leads to an erroneous conclusion that more of a product is better. The last dimension, control, is using a theory where the less humans you have working, the chances of causing errors are significantly reduced. Technology that increases control over workers helps McDonaldized systems assure customers that their products and service will be consistent. (Ritzer, p. 15) Still, the less humans working also means that there is greater control over the productions since it would be mainly non-human technology doing work.

The concept of ‘rationality’ has been talked through the centuries. According to Grey (2013), rationality is a big question because of this proposition which has the meaning and difficulties seem to be defining of a whole set of issues which have resonated through both organisation theory and practice ever since. And rationality is the basis of a decision, rational decision makers are objective and logical, they reach the goal that maximises the value. Not only rationality is important to organisations, and also it can be identified in various kinds of management theories. This essay will introduce the different aspects of the concept of ‘rationality’ and make explanations that how these are recognised in different management theories.

The rational goal model emphasises control and an external focus and views planning, goal setting, productivity and efficiency as effective. Innocent employ experts in all areas from web designers to nutritionists to sales representatives which means everyone works in their specialized field to get the best possible outcomes for the company. This is important as in some

Moving away from “Mechanistic” metaphor originated from the bureaucratic organizational theories in the early 1920s. Morgan (2006) presents a more biological view of the organization. Described as a living system the “Organism” metaphor is dependent on wider environment and functions. Such organizations are open systems and more inclined to adapt, grow, survive and to meet the needs of organizations to operate more efficiently. The flexibility to change to the best-suited structure also introduced. As organizations tend to appear and thrive in certain environments, the functions are adjusted to establish more orderly and stable environments. In line with Morgan’s “Organism” metaphor (Morgan. 2010), if they do not adapt, organizations become week and die when those needs not met.