The first order of business was the approval of the Agenda. Mr. Oja made a motion to approve the Agenda. Mr. Hartnett seconded, motion carried. Next on the Agenda was the approval of the Minutes from the June 16th Board Meeting. Mr. Hartnett made a motion to accept the Minutes as written. Mr. Oja seconded, motion carried. The next report on the Agenda was the Investment Report. Mr. Hackman provided the Trustees with a copy of the investment statements and discussed the activity at Morgan Stanley. He reviewed each investment segment in the portfolio. He also went on to discuss the current market conditions and explained his strategy moving forward. Mr. Hackman then went on to review the policy and …show more content…
Ultimately they agreed with Ms. Hadley’s recommendation. Mr. Hartnett made a motion to settle the Avery claim for up to $8,000.00. Mr. Oja seconded, motion carried. Next was the Fadel Yehya vs A E Group claim. The claimant alleged injuries to his back and knees due to heavy lifting at work. The claimant had quit his position with the employer prior to alleging any work related injuries. The claimant began treating for several alleged injuries. Video evidence was reviewed showing him extremely active at work and outside of work. The claim was ultimately facilitated. Ms. Hadley recommends that we attempt to settle this claim to avoid future medical or potential surgery. The Trustees discussed this claim and asked several questions. Ultimately they agreed with Ms. Hadley’s recommendation. Mr. Hartnett made a motion to settle the Yehya claim for up to $22,169.20. Mr. Gabrysh seconded, motion carried. The next claim was the Nizam Kljajic vs Fitzgerald Finishing claim. The claimant alleged injuries to his back along with carpal tunnel syndrome. He initially requested vacation time prior to filing a claim. He did not indicate a specific event. He was sent for an IME and the results did show some back pathology. However, the claimant had been treating for back issues for many years unrelated to his job. The claim was facilitated and some value was assigned to this claim. Ms. Hadley
The meeting was called to order promptly at 7 PM by Board President Steve Ehrlich. There were
Ms. Almanza claimed she researched and provided the claimant’s entire personnel file for this investigation and stated she was not aware of any industrial-related injuries associated with the claimants said injuries, by noting that no treating physicians ever provided any causation or the implied injuries. She provided proof with the claimant’s personnel file taken into as evidence by stating there was no medical evidence, doctors note or request of modified work duties to suggest any medical
Due to the incident of 11/20/11, the plaintiff is alleging she sustained significant injuries as result of the insured operator’s failure to properly park the bus. Since the date of loss and over a three year period, the plaintiff had undergone multiple surgeries involving the neck, back, both knees and left foot. The plaintiff has been diagnosis with multiple herniated disc of the cervical spine requiring a discectomy, multiple herniated disc of the lumbar spine resulting in a spinal fusion, right & left medial meniscus and ACL tears requiring surgical intervention and a metatarsal fusion of the left foot. In addition to the aforementioned injuries, the plaintiff has experienced ongoing episodes of depression and incontinence. .
Ms. McClellan and the claimant’s two Supervisors’ alleged throughout the claimant’s employment at Armstrong Olives, Inc., there was an incident report dated 8-7-204, when the claimant injured her right hand when she was sorting olives by hand in the Pitting Room at the Olive
| In reference to the employee’s claim, I appreciate the vote of confidence instilled in me by allowing me to do the research on the case. It gave me the opportunity to familiarize myself with the situation, refresh on the laws, understand our current policies and in addition, it gave me the opportunity to think about strategies to mitigate this type of risk in the future. Below are my findings.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Supervisor Staaf made a motion to approve the Agenda, seconded by Supervisor Blettner. Motion carried.
During the time of the claimant met with Jessica McClellan and Supervisor Jovany Villanueva, he alleged that the claimant never reported or complained about her alleged injuries that she had in her claim. He states prior to the claimant being called into the office on 2-21-15, he had not seen or heard the claimant complain of being injured at work prior to when being called into the office. The claimant did not attempt to either contact him or anyone else he is aware of that knew of the claimants injuries.
The workers’ compensation claim detailed the circumstances surrounding an injury that he suffered while at work. He confessed that while working on the job site he sustained severe burns to his lower body. His duties on this day included that he make some repairs to a leaky fuel line. During this process fuel spilled onto his pants. Additionally while making repairs pieces of steel become caught on his pants. Lastly as Mr. Martinez attempted to use a torch to cut free pipe a spark ignited the fuel on his pants. This resulted in burns to his lower body. This injury resulted in him to miss having to miss a considerable amount time from work. He filed a workers compensation to replace part of his lost wages. The suit accused the defendants of failing to maintain a safe work site for its subcontractors and in failing to provide personal protective clothing, personal protective equipment, and firefighting equipment.
An agenda was provided at the beginning of the meeting. There were seven items on the agenda. They were the Call to Order, Approval of Meeting Minutes from February 6th, 2015, the Treasurer’s Report, Fundraising Report, Program Updates, Environmental Stewardship Updates, any New
I have had an opportunity to review the Notice of Claim filed in the above-referenced matter. In addition, you and I had spoke about this claim on 06/02/17. You confirmed the plaintiff, Clarice Martin, is an employee of the Irvington UFSD and that she was injured while in the course of her employment on 03/16/17, when she was struck by a special ed student.
I refer to the matter , and his plaint brought under Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 against Central Queensland Health Service District for treatment received commencing June 2010 and subsequent.
Each of the witnesses interviewed were identified as Javad Boloorchi, Julio Carrasco, Edward Appiah and Kasara Ferasat were not privy that the claimant had filed a workers’ compensation claim for injuries when he worked at American Export Lines. It took the witnesses by surprise after they had learned the claimant had filed a workers’ compensation claim of these alleged injuries, during his employment at the Insured.
|Review the Minutes of the Board of Directors Meetings and prepare a working paper of the matters |36 |
As requested, I have reviewed the facts of the above-captioned file, along with the applicable law and summarized same in this memorandum. Mrs. Mary Smith suffered an injury to her right ankle in an automobile accident on 10/3/95. After surgery and months of rehabilitation, Mrs. Smith still suffers daily. I have researched the facts regarding a personal injury action against Paul Joseph, as well as a medical malpractice action against the medical providers.
Claims examiners make decisions daily regarding approvals for medical care, in additional to approvals for compensation payments. Regional Directors should have authority to terminate compensation in cases where an investigation by the Office of the Inspector General or Inspections Service yield results that a reasonable person would conclude is persuasive evidence of fraud. Claimants would be allowed to appeal such decisions to the Employee Compensation Appeals Board for review. The agency (OWCP) should not have to turn a blind eye, and continue to make compensation payments in cases where creditable evidence of fraud exists due to lack of a