Fiscal Policy Paper

A fiscal deficit is when a government's total expenditures exceed the tax revenues that it generates. A budget deficit can be cut by either reducing public expenditure or raising taxes. In this essay, I am going to analyse the benefits and costs of increasing tax rates to reduce fiscal deficits instead of cutting government expenditure.

The best options right now for a student with debt is to apply to the Income-Based Repayment Plan or the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program if going into a public service job. This program adjust the loan payments to be fifteen percent of their discretionary income (Atteberry). This means that their monthly loan payment is fifteen percent of what they make that is above the federal poverty level. The best part about this program is that “after twenty-five years after making payments, the borrower’s remaining balance if completely forgiven” (Atteberry). The only borrowers that can apply to the Public Service Loan Forgiveness

The growing national deficit is a looming problem in the United States now more than ever. The national debt is constantly increasing and government spending is out of control. If these issues are not solved then they could spell disaster for the nation’s economy when the infamous debt ceiling is finally reached. Currently the national policy on the debt is to continue raising the debt limit until a solution is found that is agreeable between both parties in Congress. The two main issues of over spending and the constant raising of the debts ceiling by Congress can both be resolved by government spending reform, balancing the federal budget and initiating pro-growth policies in order to increase the government’s tax revenue.

The recent clash between the president and congress about raising the debt ceiling made the front page on every newspaper throughout the country and generated controversy of unimaginable proportion among the citizens of the United States of America (College for Financial Planning). No macroeconomics issue is more controversial today than the impact of large public debt on the economy and on future generations, but, however, there appears to be a huge disconnect between professional, political leaders, and the ordinary public about the national debt and its impact on the current and future

Economically there are many challenges we face as a country with our current fiscal policies. Since the 2008 financial crisis, there have been many debates in regards to how we should go about managing our financial system. Unfortunately, we as team believe that in order for us to stabilize our nation financial issues we are going to have to make restrictions in certain channels, which might affecting our way of life. One area needing attention is government spending and how it has to be reduced, and this would have a ripple effect in certain areas. Our elected officials will have to come to a compromise and determine which sectors are costly and can be reduced.

On October 19, 2017, the Senate approved a budget that would aid Republican efforts to create tax cuts in a vote of 51-49. In essence, this budget would expand the federal deficit by 1.5 trillion dollars over a span of 10 years. According to Republicans, the intent of these tax cuts is to create more jobs as well as providing more income to Americans as a whole. However, many Democrats are starkly opposed to this budget because of how it will increase the federal deficit as well as reducing the potency of federal revenue provided by taxes. With the budget being approved by the Senate, it is now up to the House to adopt its version of the budget to officially make it into law.

Many United States' citizens are unaware of the country's current financial state. Many assume that one of the world's wealthiest countries could never be in debt. This is untrue however, and, in fact, the country with the greatest income per capita is in major debt. This study will examine possible solutions to reducing the United States' national budget deficit.

The federal budget is known as the notorious economic tank from which money is distributed to various programs. The money used every fiscal year, which begins October 1st and ends September 30th the next year, belongs to the people. The government raises this money through taxes and they spend it on national defense, Medicare, and social security. The federal budget is an exercise in making choices, and those options will certainly affect individuals living in the U.S. These choices cause debt to pile up on the government, who is struggling to make it disappear. The deficit and debt of a government gauges how well it is being run and how well it has been run in the past. According to The Economist the national debt is the total

Fiscal responsibility is an important part of stability and the government must focus on maintaining the economic stability. As we all know, Government dept can quickly become a burden on the economy and weaken it. Macroeconomic policies change credibility of the government and strengthen political institutions. It is very important that our economy has credibility and stability because it’s vital to us Americans long term investment decisions that allow the US economy to grow. Government provide stability by ensuring to maintain stability of currency, enforce-defend property rights, and provide oversight that assures private citizens that their transaction partners in marketplaces are

Audience: The audience of this paper is for two people. One, for the people of the United States that deal with the consequences of a large federal deficit, and two for the lawmakers in Congress that have the ability to change the situation.

March 23, 2018, was not just like any other day. On this particular Friday, the President signed the Omnibus Bill into law costing America $1.3 trillion. Several news articles were written in response, but one article, in particular, drew attention. The headline, “Fiscal policy is ‘spinning out of control’”, said a lot, but it took a little digging to understand why so many people had these feelings for the bill.

This paper will attempt to answer the question: Is the federal deficit and government deficits in general a good or a bad thing? While it may be easy to lose sight of how the government chooses to handle its money, it is also important for citizens to be conscious of how their money is being spent, and whether or not the current course that the government is plotted on is either sustainable or the best allocation of resources.

Fiscal policy is the use of a government’s taxing, debt, and spending authority for the purpose of influencing economic growth. Congress and the president share responsibility for economic policy with the Federal Reserve (Hubbard & O’Brien, 2011, p. 929). The government can influence macroeconomic productivity levels by increasing or decreasing tax levels and public spending (Hubbard & O’Brien, 2011). The government uses fiscal policy to make changes in government purchases and taxes, to achieve policy goals. The price level and the levels Gross Domestic Product and total employment in the economy rely on the collective demand and short term aggregate supply. The government can both aggregate demand and collective supply through fiscal policy (Hubbard & O’Brien, 2011, p. 900). Fiscal policies can influence the economy’s production and employment.

The Department of Education in recent times has embraced a new system regarding student loans, bringing on board a customer-friendly policy. According to this new scheme, students will now have access to loans with easier and less complex repayment terms. This development will help them fast-track the repayment of their debts without hassles. The Department of Education also integrated an income-based repayment plan: a flexible approach geared at facilitating student finance in their most dire hour of need. Sadly, despite having the potentials to substantially pull off the amount of burden on people’s shoulders, this income-driven repayment scheme hasn’t gained much traction and acceptability among the general population. This is due to

Appropriate government bodies make the determination of national fiscal policies. Occasionally there are involuntary economic establishments and every now and then a discretionary fiscal policy is necessary. These elements are established by the government bodies, which are predominately the President or Congress. While economic activities rise and fall; both taxes and fiscal expenditures involuntarily act in response in ways that even out the economy. For instance, during an economic deceleration, the government’s spending on benefits to the unemployed elevates automatically while the rate of unemployment increases. This spending increase is automatic in that it does not entail unequivocal proceedings by the President or Congress. Likewise, payments of tax decline automatically as the economy enters a recession (Shenk, 2008). In addition to the fiscal policy’s automatic reactions, governments have the capacity to establish discretionary fiscal modifications in order to combat an economic downturn. For instance, the stimulus package and bailouts in which Congress recently approved is a great case in point of the discretionary fiscal policy.