Flat World Essay

Technology has consumed this generation to believe we need to rely on it. Although technology has helped us to save more lives than in previous decades. The technology that is affecting us are the ones with screens. These devices are useful for entertainment, news, communication, and to learn. They are powerful devices that can change someone's life in both a negative and positive effect. It can be easily obtained and used by anyone at anytime if accessible. Looking at screens are a waste of time.

Like Solnit, I believe society, especially the younger generation, has suffered greatly with the expansion of the Digital Revolution that we are now living in. One of the main perpetrators in my opinion is the emergence of the smartphone. Considering that presently there are over four billion mobile phone users in the world right now, and that 3.5 billion people with access to the internet in 2016, a 900% increase since the year 2000, it is no wonder that our society has changed drastically in these past few years. Thanks to smartphones, the vast population of the world now have easy access to the internet from their back pocket. In recent years smartphones have become the most popular way to surf the web, so with that in mind I have chosen the smartphone as an object which will signify how our culture has changed in recent history.

Technology is viewed in today’s society as an essential tool for Americans. It allows us to quickly share our ideas with other people and learn about any and everything. Many people use their devices as a source of entertainment. However, there are still some people in our country who use phones and computers as a tool only and still prefer books for knowledge and reading. Ray Bradbury, who is the author of Fahrenheit 451, likes the idea of technology as a way of accessing information but discourages other uses such as spending an obsessive amount of time playing videogames. In Fahrenheit 451 Bradbury uses the motif of technology to point out that our devices can never replace our human love of and need for nature and personal interaction.

Imagine living in a world where all people do is use their gadgets and gizmos. Books are banned and knowledge is intolerable. Ray Bradbury, the author of the book Fahrenheit 451 knows for a fact that our world will most definitely be like that someday. He is trying to warn us about the consequences of having too much technology. In the dystopian world of Fahrenheit 451, people are addicted to their televisions and they don't socialize with each other. The real world today is also facing a similar situation with smartphones and other gadgets. People are always staring down on their glowing mobile devices and the idea of knowledge and interaction is slowly starting to fade away from the society too. The novel Fahrenheit 451 is cautioning the

Electronic devices are consuming the lives of everyday people. Everywhere you look someone will be locked in staring at their phone screen, unaware of what’s happening around him or her. Electronic devices have become a daily necessity for people. Electronic devices are a controversial topic today. While some believe that electronic devices are harmful, others believe these devices benefit society. In, “A Thing Like Me,” Nicholas Carr brings up the extent on which humans depend on devices. The dependence on electronic devices has consequences. The consequences that come from electronic devices are in takes away from face to face communication, the devices cause distractions when driving which can lead to serious injuries or even death. Electronic devices also have changed the way of learning, people no longer feel the need to learn when typing a question into Google gives people the answer. Electronic devices are a part of society and can cause negative impacts in peoples lives everyday. People do not realize the consequences that electronic devices bring into their

Twenge is thorough and credible in listing the many ways in which youth and young adults of today are affected by new technology. The article was intended to prove that children who grow up with a phone or tablet in their hands will have

Over the past few years technology has changed and had significant impact on the way we live. Almost everyone has a smart phone, regardless of age or social status. We text and email instead of talk, because it faster and convenient. We can rent movies with a click of the button and stream it to our device or home. Everything is based on internet and although prices aren’t cheap, everyone can afford something that suits their budget. I have also noticed that our textbook uses bar scan, assuming that everyone has a smart phone to retrieve it. Tablets, which are like mini

If people spent less time using their devices they would find enough time to be productive and accomplish their tasks of the day. In order to do so, people need to lose the habit of spending hours on their phone. Technology, in 1984 is relied on so much and is mainly used to make sure people obeyed the law and weren’t using appropriate vocabulary or having thoughts. If people spent less time on their phones, they would rely on it less and feel less attached to it, leading to having people do more things and relying on different items not just necessarily technology or their electronic devices. When people rely on technology, they expect science to do the work for them, while if they didn’t rely so much on technology, they tend to use their knowledge more and not so much electronic devices.

In this chapter, Thomas Friedman looks at how cultures and societies will have to deal with and adapt to the changes that globalization brings to the way of doing business. It affects whole companies and individuals. He gives the perception of the world is flattening by comparing the Industrial Revolution to the IT Revolution that is happening right now. The flattening process was identified by Karl Marx and Frederich Engels in the Communist Manifesto, published in 1848. Marx’s writings about capitalism state “the inexorable march of technology and capital to remove all barriers, boundaries, frictions, and restraints to global commerce (Friedman 234).”

1. “But Friedman’s image of a flat earth is profoundly misleading – a view of the world from a seat in business class. Flatness is another way of describing the transnational search by companies for cheap labor, an image that misses the pervasiveness of global inequality and the fact that much of the developing world remains mired in poverty and misery. It also misses the importance of the global geopolitical hierarchy, which guarantees the provision of stability, property rights, and other international public goods. The rise of China and India is less about flatness than it is about dramatic upheavals in the mountains and valleys of the global geopolitical map”

he World Is Flat is Friedman’s explanation of the brave new world facing us. A world that is growing at a rapid pace never seen before in history. Friedman believes that flattening of the world has happened as a result of occurrence of a series of events which he outlines as ten flattening factors. The low-cost computers, dot com bubble, standardized file format, excess laying of optic fibres, outsourcing and offshoring are some of them. This phenomena has the potential to change all of our theories of economies, politics and jobs. It will increase competition and require not only an emphasis on new skills sets, but a much more self-reliant, creative and innovative mind-set.

Because The World is Flat was published in 2005, the basic message of Thomas Friedman’s lecture is fairly common knowledge nowadays. I am well aware of the fact that the world is more connected now than ever before. We have access to an abundance of information at our fingertips. We can collaborate on a project with people miles away from the comfort of our own homes. We can order just about anything online, from clothes to airline tickets to food. The world is still not completely flat, however. Underdeveloped areas like Haiti and parts of Africa prevent the world from being entirely flat, as these areas do not have the resources necessary to connect with the world around them. Regardless, I find it interesting that Friedman pinpoints exact dates as leading to the flattening of the world, and more interesting still that those are the dates he chose. The fall of the Berlin Wall and the release of Netscape are both examples of when the world literally become more connected. It seems like one could say the same

Technology has, since the primitive years, always been used to invent tools in order to solve problems. This would, in turn, simplify and make man’s life easier. Through advancements in the field, man has become more efficient on both the macro- and microscopic level. Anything nowadays can be attained with either the flip of a switch or a click of a mouse. One particular technology that came about in this time was the smartphone. Since 2008, the smartphone, a device that combines a normal cell phone with a computer, typically offering Internet access, data storage, e-mail capability, etc. all in your hand was deemed as ground-breaking technology and created one of the largest and most competitive market in terms of

The phrase: "the world is flat" can be interpreted in many ways. Basically what Friedman means by "flat" is "linked." The falling of trade and political barriers and technical advances have made it possible to do business, instantaneously with billions of other people around the world. It has allowed for parts of the world, which had previously been cut off, like China and India, to successfully compete in the world market. Thus, the playing field is being leveled, and no one nation has an advantage. Friedman could also refer to a "flat world" in a metaphorical sense. In a spherical earth you cannot see around the world and cannot recognize the opportunities far from where you live. If the world were flat you could see it all. There

Besides the ten flatteners that Friedman discusses in the book, he also talks about the convergences that create a flatter world. The first convergence deals with engaging people from around the globe and being able to communicate. More likely than not, my computer parts and chips would be manufactured in China, were I can collaborate with engineers designing custom parts. When a design change is needed I could send email and use video chat to have meetings to discuss what changes my company would need. Being able to email and chat in real time would increase efficiency in my product design. Without this ability to outsource and possibly hire a Chinese engineer to help translate material, my design team may not be as robust. I could have a sales center based in India that I could direct all my sales information and technical support where more engineers and services sector people could perform the tasks needed therein reducing the cost of have a call center and sales locally.