Flexible Constitution Pros And Cons

The United States of America was formed through struggles and the want for liberties of its people. For its people to have these liberties, the original colonies created a central government in the form of the constitution. However, the constitution was immensely broad when it came to certain topics. States began to create their own constitutions. These constitutions followed the federal standards set by the United States constitution, yet made different situations in each state clearer and gave specific instructions for certain situations. As times change with the generations, these constitutions are often updated. However, Texas has one of the longest constitutions, which has remained the same since 1876. The current argument surrounding the constitution is whether it is up to date with its amendments or if it should be rewritten.

The Constitution should change with society. Like all societies, ours changes with time. Like it or not, things will be different in the future. Although we agree with things we are doing now, we may not in the future. Our constitution is ment to be part of a lasting government in the land of the free. If the USA really wishes to be held up to that title, its people must be able to agree, and if needed, change the Constitution.

The ability of The Constitution to be amended is what still allows it to be relevant today. The updates that are made reflect the attitude of the nation. An example of this being the

The United States Constitution was drafted up to help America grow as a country and be a country where everyone wanted to live. It was written as a guidline to follow to ensure its citizens rights and liberties, and their pursuit to happiness. There is a lot of controversy over the US constitution on whether or not some of the things in there are good or bad or what not. I think that the United States Constitution was very well written and it follows a very principalistic guidline and it has its own moral and principals. Just like the unalienable rights that everyone talks about. These rights are meant to stand for its people. They cannot be taken away from the government, they cant be tampered with by the government or anything like

In any given constitution a nation, the recording of bills of rights has been a gradual process. All the aspects of life in society were done with respect to the law. The society requires being guided by certain principles and guidelines that would define and evaluate each and every aspect of their lives. To ensure that the entire society remained focused and concentrated in the given policies and guidelines, they recorded in the constitution and made available to each and every member of the society for the purpose of doing reviews. The action of the people would be judged in accordance with the constitution. With society running several errands towards the realization of development, many fields had to be covered. Criteria for the operation of the people would require significant efforts to accomplish the set objectives. Violations in the society occur either due to misunderstanding or lack of awareness of the rights present in the constitution. Any form of violation is evaluated by the appropriate form of punishment offered. (Hand, 1965)

The Constitution (LEQ) The Constitution is a document that basically frames out the entire government of the United States of America. It was created because the Articles of Confederation wasn’t powerful enough, and the forefathers believed that the country wouldn’t survive as long as the government was being ran how it was. In some ways the Constitution is a continuation of the Articles such as Enlightenment ideals. However, the Constitution was also a major departure from the Articles in regards to federalism, and diplomacy.

the Constitution is living. It is very limited on what is changed, and why. Many politicians

The first method starts in the legislative branch. It must be proposed by a senator to a subcommittee and must achieve a vote of greater than 50% to continue. It will then go to the full senate to be voted on. If a vote of over 75% for the amendment is made, then the amendment will be made. If a vote of between 60% and 75% is reached the president will be asked to decide if the amendment with be ratified. The second method of ratifying an amendment will start in the executive branch with the President. The President can choose to push to create an amendment when he sees necessary. After this, the proposed amendment will go to the full senate to be voted on. If a vote of 60% is achieved, then the amendment will be ratified. This allows for change of the constitution but only if there is absolute certainty that the proposed change is needed.

Article V of the Constitution was formed through a compromise that stated that congress or a convention of states has amendment power. This is known as the formal process, in which two steps are utilized: proposal and ratification. Any member of the House of Representatives or the Senate can propose to amend the Constitution. If it is approved by two-thirds of the originating house of congress, whether is it the Senate or the House of Representatives, it is then sent to the other side for a vote. If it again receives a two-thirds vote it will be sent to the states for ratification. The convention of states also has the ability to amend the Constitution, however this is very unlikely. To force congress to hold a convention two-thirds of the state legislatures would have to apply for such a convention. Although many applications have been sent, never in history has a convention like this been held. On the off chance that either happens, the proposed amendment will be required to have a three-fourths vote of the state to become part of the Constitution. Since this formal procedure is extremely difficult to complete, the amendments delivered have an extensive impact. For example the first 10 amendments, known as the

Many people believe that the process to amending the constitution is difficult and too complicated but, I believe that the process is perfect for amending the constitution. There are two steps for creating an amendment, proposal and ratification. For step one, the amendment is to be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both houses of congress or a constitutional convention is called by congress on petition of two-thirds of the fifty states. For step two, to ratify an amendment one would need three-fourths of the fifty state legislatures or three-fourths of special constitutional conventions are called by the fifty states. The final result makes an amendment. The proposal by a constitutional convention has never been used to create an amendment.

While establishing the United States Constitution, the states believed in a free country that lived under a stable and harmonious government. After the adoption of the Constitution, following presidents would continue to hold onto the policies of the country in hopes to create a stable government for the states by participating in certain foreign affairs and developing certain limitations that eventually contribute to the development of the government. From 1789 to 1797, under the presidency of George Washington, the United States was able to establish both the executive and judicial branches that attribute to the establishment of a semi-stable economy and court system. He also supported the Bill of Rights that guaranteed the basic rights of the Americans and was written partially in favor of the Anti-Federalists. In his farewell address, he states certain policies that the United States should not participate in, such as foreign entanglements, however these statements were later ignored under the presidency of John Adams. From 1797 to 1801, under the presidency of John Adams, he sought to avoid a full-scale war with France by taking part in the XYZ Affair and the Convention of 1800. However, in doing so, it resulted in building coastal defenses and started the construction of the Department of the Navy and created a standing army, which urged for military defense funding. Under his presidency, he also created and ratified the Alien and Sedition Acts, where these acts

One of the two ways the Constitution can be amended is by Congressional method. Two-thirds of both houses of Congress may vote to pass an amendment and then submit the amendment to the states where three-fourths must vote to ratify. This process

Many people will argue that the new Constitution will take away individual and state rights, however, that is not true. The Constitution promises basic rights for all citizens and for the states in the form on the Bill of Rights. It improves many of the things that made the Articles of Confederation weak and balances the power throughout the government. People shouldn’t be afraid of a more powerful government because it will benefit not only the U.S. but the people as well.

This writing is base on argumentative essay with regard to written and unwritten constitution which is geared towards the examination of each with the sole aim of trying to find the one that best suites UK constitution base on my belief.

The British constitution is flexible in nature, which has allowed for the development of this country over centuries without the need for a fully codified constitution. I