Fluoridated Water In Australia

Fluoride in drinking water has been a hot topic in the past decade. Some communities are all for it and some are completely against it. With such a range of opinions on the matter some organizations have took it upon themselves to present the pros and cons of the fluoride to the public so they can make informed decisions. Often times these surveys are bias to one side or the other, so I shall be giving information on both sides of the issue, the future outlook, and my personal opinion in order to help inform you to decide on your own.

Studies show that dental caries does not increase following the cessation of fluoridated water (21,22)

Higgs explains in her essay that the use of fluoride has been used in water for some time now and that it is used to help prevent tooth decay as stated in her citations. She further explains that when brushing ones teeth and swallows an “x” amount of toothpaste that that one should called poison control, so why would one be able to drink it? About sixty percent of homes contain fluoride-added water and an average person is suppose to drink eight 8-ounce glasses of water each day, while the amount of fluoride in each glass contains more than twice the amount (to be consumed) of fluoride allowed in toothpaste (Higgs par.2), and if one had too much

This is because according to the department of health, Rnzcgp this process is not able to be regulated and the dosage is dependent on the person’s circumstances i.e age which can result in health problems. When too large a dose is absorbed into the system according to the The United Nation news it can cause health issues relating to skeletal and dental fluorosis. The compound is also shown to affect the brain and kidney negatively. Fluoridation is a system by which the town or country is taking responsibility for its people. The proposed action is not to fluoridate teeth by adding fluoride to the entire water supply which will affect every person’s entire body with fluoride, but to instead educate about the benefits of using toothpaste which people already commonly use. People can suffer adverse effects because the government would further their own goal. There is no controversy about the people and side effect because I propose not fluoridating. So the evidence is that there will be 100% no risk to getting the side effects, and yet there is no limitation of restricting tooth hygiene and maintaining tooth health through personal care. The evidence of science is that not using a material eliminates the potential for side effects. Personally I find that instead of treating drinking water we should be treating personal care products such as tooth paste which is more effective action. Therefore there is no risk of affecting the entire population in the hands of just a

Prevention in itself is cost effect. One solution that may lower the total number of teeth related health issues involves the use and access of community water fluoridation to everyone in the country. Community water fluoridation is the process of adjusting the amount of fluoride found in water in order to increase prevention of tooth decay. Fluoride is a mineral that occurs naturally on Earth that is released from rocks into soil, water, and air. All water contains some levels of fluoride, however natural springs and some bits of groundwater having the most. Fluoride does not only protect teeth from tooth decay, but it also rebuilds and even strengthens the tooth’s surface/ enamel. Community water fluoridation pushes consistent and frequent

The Centers for Disease Control have proclaimed water fluoridation as one the 10 great public health achievements of the 20th century (ADA 2010). Although water fluoridation has sparked a great deal of controversy, properly fluoridated water has been proven to be safe and effective (Harding & O’Mullane, 2013). Proper water fluoridation includes consistent monitoring of fluoride concentrations to keep them at safe levels, within 0.8 – 1.0ppm (Harding & O’Mullane, 2013). When these measures are taken, fluoridated water is a great preventive measure and helps to improve or maintain the oral health of a population. Community water fluoridation is also very cost effective and helps with preventing dental caries. By implementing community water

For the past seventy years, fluoridated drinking water has provided people across the country daily dental care, straight from the tap. Named one of the ten great public health achievements of the 20th century by the CDC, fluoridated water substantially reduces tooth decay, making fewer emergency dentist visits as easy as sipping a cup of good old fashioned H2O. Yet dangerous misinformation about fluoridated water persists. As Thomasville, High Point, Lexington and Denton’s most trusted source for dental care, you know Smith Bundy Fisher DDS PA always offers reliable oral health information you can count on. Here, they debunk harmful myths about fluoridated water.

Fluoride is a highly toxic substance, in terms of acute toxicity fluoride is just slightly less toxic than arsenic. Fluoride has long been used in pesticides and rat poison. Studies have shown that fluoride causes bone defects such as arthritis and skeletal fluorosis, thyroid disease, and even cancer. This raises the question, why would anyone think that water fluoridation is a good idea? (Fluoride Alert, 2017).

According to Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General, “ Epidemiological studies carried out during the last five decades provide strong evidence supporting the effectiveness of water fluoridation in preventing coronal and root caries in children and adults.” (USDHHS, 2000) This initiative, while beneficial, must be monitored to ensure that optimal levels of fluoride are present to minimize the risks, most notably fluorosis, which can occur. In a University of York study on fluoridation levels, it was found that at fluoride levels of only 1.0ppm, fluorosis levels in the public were nearly 48% (McDonagh et. al., 2000). Through doing its job by evaluating, reporting, and potentially working to improve its results, the water districts are working to both maximize the benefit of the public, and also minimize the potential risks associated with

Fluoride is a mineral that happens actually in all sustenances and water supplies. The fluoride particle originates from the component fluorine. Fluorine, the thirteenth most bottomless component in the world 's covering, is never experienced in its free state in nature. It exists just in mix with different components as a fluoride compound. Fluoride is compelling in anticipating and turning around the early indications of tooth rot. Scientists have demonstrated that there are a few routes through which fluoride accomplishes its rot preventive impacts. It makes the tooth structure more grounded, so teeth are more impervious to corrosive assaults. Corrosive is framed when the microscopic organisms in plaque separate sugars and starches from the eating regimen. Rehashed corrosive assaults separate the tooth, which causes cavities.

Fluoride is not a beneficial mineral to dental patients because it is harmful. According to the American Cancer Society, “Researchers found evidence of cancer-causing potential of fluoridated drinking water in male rats based on the higher than expected number of cases of osteosarcoma. Fluoridation might affect the risk of osteosarcoma based on the fact that fluoride tends to collect in parts of bones where they were growing” (“Water Fluoridation and Cancer Risk”). Fluoride can potentially cause osteosarcoma, which is bone cancer. Any type of cancer is not presumably an advantage. A patient that receives such a cancer from toothpaste or fluoridated water should really be a concern. This can be nowhere near beneficial to anyone. Dr. Mercola

The (SDWA) did set a primary standards (enforceable limits) for the fluoride concentration in the drinking water that is 4.0 (mg/L) or 4.0 ppm as a (MCLG & MCL) respectively. At this level of protection which is based on the best available science research that will prevent potential health problems. In addition, (SDWA) did set a secondary standard (non-enforceable limits) for the fluoride concentration in the drinking water that is 2.0 (mg/L) or 2.0 ppm as a (MCL). At this level which undergo as cosmetic effect and may cause skin, tooth discoloration, aesthetic effects. However, the (EPA) recommends secondary standards of the fluoride to water systems as it achieves the balance between the beneficial effects of protection such as tooth decay

On one hand, fluoridation should be supported because firstly, it protects you from having tooth decay. By having fluoride in water, you can help prevent yourself from having tooth decay, the most common childhood disease, in the most efficient way. Apparently water fluoridation is very effective that the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention put it in the top ten of great public health achievements of the 20th century. Secondly, it protects the teeth of all ages. It has been recognised by World Health Organisation, American Dental Association and U.S. Surgeons General that water fluoridation contain health benefits and prevent tooth decay. According to a study, fluoride in community water systems prevent 25 percent of tooth decay in children

Mouthwash was first analyzed by a calibration curve, which was determined to have a fluoride concentration + standard deviation of 194.5 + 34.9 ppm. Analyzing mouthwash with standard addition resulted in the concentration being 91.9 ppm. The volume percent of fluoride in mouthwash was then calculated to be 0.019% and 0.009% for the calibration curve and standard additions method respectively. The actual volume percent of the mouthwash

WATER FLUORIDATION: - A high degree of reduction in caries/ tooth decay occur when fluoride content is approximately IPPM (i.e. one part of fluoride to one million part of water), the prevalence of oral fluorosis increase greatly when the concentration of fluoride is more than 1pm.