Identify which slide represents the type of follower discussed by Kellerman and why.
Slide 1 represent the participant type of follower. Kelleman states these types of followers care about the organization and try to make an impact. If they do not agree with the leader, they will try to challenge them (Kelleman, 2009). The picture illustrates followers, following and then stops (by using a hand), this makes me believe that they are challenging the leader.
Slide 2 represent the bystanders type of follower. Kelleman talks about how this type of follower is an observer, not a participate who deliberately decides to stand by and disengage from their leaders (Kellrman, 2009). She also stats these types of follower will stand by and do nothing even
…show more content…
The isolated followers care less about their leader and tend to keep their heads down and they just do their jobs (Kellrman, 2009). The reason I think this illustration could represent the isolated followers is because there isn’t a defined leader that I can see, and people are not linked together and seem to be far away from the inter linked circle. Diehard followers are passionate about an idea and/or a person. They will bend over backwards for that idea and/or person if they consider it/them to be worthy. They are dedicated employees. The reason I think this illustration could possibly represent a diehard follower is because of the people who are linked together within the picture that may be dedicated to an idea, while the others are not. I had a hard time with this …show more content…
Leadership can build a relationship with these types of followers by communicating openly and providing the goals and outcomes of the new opportunities. Leaders should also listen to their ideas so they feel engaged. According to the “Building and Sustaining Relationships” article, leaders need to take time to listen (Community Tool Box, n.d.).
Diehards followers: According to the “Building and Sustaining Relationships” article, “building and sustaining relationships are at the heart of organizing communities” (Community Tool Box, n.d.); leaders need to pay special attention to those who demonstrate their strong support says Barbara Kellerman (Kellerman, 2007).
Participants followers: These types of followers will try to change the direction if they do not agree with the leader’s ideas, etc. (Kelleman, 2009). Leaders should watch over these types of followers and pay close attention to whether these followers are against them. According to the “Building and Sustaining Relationships” article, you can disagree and still build relationships with individuals who are working against your goals by creating dialogue groups to hear why advertise views the issues the way they do (Community Tool Box,
The relationship between leaders and followers is clearly shown through the creative use of an extended
2. Followership should be viewed as an active skill that must be developed in order to be considered an effective follower. According to the Air and Space Power Journal (Winter 2004), followership is considered a discipline that when viewed from a professional perspective is considered both an art and a science, requiring a balance between the development of skills and the understanding of followership roles within a professional
Leaders are the central figures in a team, and they are attributed to the largest share of blame or praise depending on the performance. New leaders in an organization are faced with many challenges on how to start making an impact and successfully lead the subordinates on the set mission. According to Kangas (2013), the key element for a new leader is to establish interpersonal links and relationships that are necessary for learning about the organization. The success of the leader and the organization as a team depends on the quality of interpersonal relationships that develop to help the leader in implementing their mission. Additionally, the influence of leaders over their followers is largely founded on the interpersonal relationship as members of a team (Kangas, 2013). Another major source of challenge for leaders in organizations is the implementation of changes that affect the existing relationships and roles in major operations. BBBSA demonstrates the challenges that can arise for new leaders in organizations in implementing changes and the effectiveness of the Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory in addressing leadership issues.
Leaders foster collaboration and build trust by empowering others to take initiative and responsibility (Kouzes & Posner, 2012). Within this practice, leaders focus on building a bond with their constituents, sharing information, and enabling their team to make independent decisions to meet goals. The primary goal of this practice is building trust with constituents. In addition, communicating interdependence and fostering collaboration are critical to this practice. The role of an exemplary leader is to create a connected environment where people feel supported, competent and
Imagine you are standing in a hall overlooking a large dance as the people below you wander in seemly random directions. That is until you look a little closer. In the beginning people will stay around the edges, wondering from group to group. But as more people began to fill the room a select few will brave the dance floor, until next thing you know everyone is there: crowding towards the middle, eyeing other's dance moves, only to later copy them. Examples like this give others a chance to see how people can be broken down into two categories: the sheep, who are the followers and those who later stepped onto the dance floor, and the shepherds, of who are the leaders, the ones who mindlessly entered the center of attention. Scenarios like
Through trusting interpersonal relationships staff members are empowered to discuss openly concerns and proposed solutions without consequence from the leader. It is important that followers feel comfortable with approaching the leader with complaints or concerns. Leadership demonstrating a neutral position and maintaining a non-judgmental attitude when faced with difficult situations is much easier to approach.
In followership there needs to be a leader that inspires and bonds followers together as a unit moving in one direction. Today’s leader has to be more than someone that was placed in a position of authority, a person with a title and a higher salary level. A real leader is found when the behaviors and attitudes of their
The people around them are the ones that are following every order they receive with out hesitating, so in reality they are changing to believe whatever the leader tells them to do. In "Group
Followers help leaders manifest their vision. Successful followers (supporters or team members) come in a wide variety of personal characteristics. There are people who may be good followers who do not make good leaders or even want to be leaders, but there are no good leaders who are not good followers. A good leader was once a follower. Without followers there is no leadership in any organization. Leaders can develop effective followers as followers develop effective leaders. The performance of followers and leaders of an organization are variables that depend on one another. Both roles are proactive together they can
The role of the follower and the quality of the relationship itself are informally negotiated between followers and their leaders over time (Gils, Quaquebeke, & Knippenberg, 2009). Based on the LMX theory, leaders build a special relationship with an inner circle, or “in-group”, of followers, who often get high levels of responsibility and access to resources. The in-group members work harder and are more committed to task objectives. They are also expected to be totally committed and loyal to their leader. Conversely, other followers fall in the “out-group" and are given low levels of choice or influence. Aggression, sarcasm and a self-centered view are qualities seen in the out-group. The quality of the LMX relationship varies and is better when the challenge of the job is extremely high or extremely low (Graen et al., 1982).
The concept of followership has existed for decades, but only in relatively recent times has the idea received more attention. The dictionary definition of the word followership is “the capacity or willingness to support a leader”.
Chapter one portrays the importance on followers and provides some insight and labels different types of followers. Riggio et al (2008), provides examples on the various styles of individuals as followers, for instance, the sheep, the yes-people, the alienated, the pragmatics, and the star followers. Furthermore, these classes of followers provide a better understanding to leaders on why one performs in an organization.
The table below (Babou, 2008) summarizes the leadership behaviors that the SLT presumes are appropriate to the various stages of follower readiness. Each quadrant of the Leadership Behaviors chart corresponds to the same quadrant in
Effective followership is an essential component of effective leadership in that, without good followers, the leader’s work is difficult and cumbersome. The role of the follower is many times understated. As illustrated by Kelley (1998), “effective followers are thinkers; energetic and assertive, self-starters, independent problem solvers, and carry out their tasks with these characteristics (p. 143). Effective followers also are characterized by their ability to perform tasks with little supervision, their intelligence, and ability to think for themselves. We are all followers, even those who consider themselves leaders; so to encourage this effectiveness in others; we must be role models for those under us, so that they may also be effective at following. Chaleff (2009) observed that “all important social accomplishments require complex
As I work hard to make myself available to my followers. Creating a strong relationship with those around me is one of my top goals As I work hard to make myself available to my followers. Creating a strong relationship with those around me is one of my top goals because once you develop a relationship, it becomes easier to work together on a project. I reach out to those around me almost daily, and I will continue to reach out to those who will follow me in the future. I want my followers to know that I am here for them. In the leadership positions, I am in now, I make sure that I post get together that are open to everyone: from an organized movie night, going to get food, studying together, or offering everyone a hot cup of tea (or other food). I make sure that the mentees know my door is open to them. I encourage almost any form of communication from text to a letter, but most of the communication, between my followers and I, is done through a group chat or face to face. I feel like my interactions have created a more open environment where the students feel safe coming to me to talk about topics they do not feel open enough sharing with a lot of people. I am aware that my leadership roles will change, thus the way I interact with my followers will change with it. One thing that will stay the same is my effort to be involved with those around me. Just letting them know that I want to be there for them helps build bonds of respect and trust with any follower group.