Food Labeling And Advertisements By Law, Must Be True, And Not Misinforming Essay

Zinczencko complains that unlike many other hazardous items, fast food does not come with warnings on how terrible the food is for one’s health and its future effects. He emphasizes that even if the customers were able to obtain the nutritional facts, they are not palpable, but rather obscure. He points out that the fast-food companies make the nutrition labels vague and misleading; they calculate the calories for every separate part of the meal, and they make it so the consumer must pay attention to serving size as well. He observes that the fast-food industry can get away with confusing labels because there are not any Food and Drug Administration labeling requisites (Word Smart, p. 220) covering fast food. Zinczenko complains that there is not any sort of nutritional labeling on the menus at fast-food restaurants. Now, nine years later, there are some changes, but his point is still valid. McDonald’s menu now states the calories of each meal, but as Zinczenko points out, it is very difficult to

Research shows that when such information is given, customers use it to limit the way they eat. This can consume an average loss of calories than they typically did before labeling. This trend poses increased risk, not just in terms of calories, but in terms of unhealthful ingredients such as fat and sodium. According to the passage, "the U.S. government agrees that restaurant meals should be labeled. It is part of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, which requires that standard menu items include information on nutrition 1". This poses that fast food places and restaurants should in fact label information, not only for ones own health but it is required.

Some items at Walmart or any grocery store do not have any nutritional facts. People would have a hullabaloo about how their favorite food is unhealthy for their self and their family. If items do not have nutritional facts list somewhere on the object it should not be sold. The author states that “ The United States of America’s Governments agree with labels on items and menus and menus boards.” Some of the items say that they are “Lowfat or Fat free,” which is false

The dangers of the food industry need to be revealed to the public so that people can live healthier lifestyles. For this to be done, the food companies need to start labeling what is in their food. There are numerous harmful chemicals and hormones found in the food we consume, and there needs to be more awareness of what society is recklessly ingesting. A two-year study on the effects of genetic mutation on mice was published on September 19th, 2011 in Food and Chemical Toxicology. In the experiment, the mice consumed corn that was sprayed with Roundup, the food company, Monsanto’s brand of weed killer, or drank water with levels of Roundup that are similar to what is found in U.S. tap water. The shocking results revealed that the mice

Modern processed foods are packaged in ways that are designed to sell. With many people seeking healthy and nutritious food options, it makes sense that companies would want to portray their products as such. In the article “Front-of-Package Food Labels”, Marion Nestle and David S. Ludwig discuss why vague and unproven front-of-package labels should not be allowed on processed food packages.

With all of the information readily available on the internet and news broadcasts it is hard not to hear about the government food labeling controversy currently going on. There are people who want to label genetically modified, organic and natural foods and then there are some who want to do away with all of the labels for one reason or another. Government mandated food labels are a big deal right now because everyone has an opinion about it. A main cause of why this is such a big problem is because not all of the information out there on the subject is correct. Some labels can be misleading to consumers unless they know what regulations and standards are used in order to stamp certain words onto food packages. The biggest factor of the cause and the main focus to the solution here are the same thing: education.

On FDA food labels, the accuracy of the amount of substances being ingested is true. An article published by FDA Consumer shows the accuracy rates of the FDA labels, “Total Carbohydrate 98%, Total Fat 96%, Sugars 95%, Calories 93%, Saturated Fat 93%, Sodium 90%, Cholesterol 80%, Dietary Fiber 80%, Calcium 80%” (Accuracy of Information on Nutrition Labels). Although these rates are not 100%, this study was done in 1996. The article goes on to state that, “Findings were based on 2,000 laboratory tests of 300 retail food products” (Accuracy of Information on Nutrition Labels). With the limited technology of the time, these are still reliable statistics. Also, it is difficult to measure the exact quantity of some of these substances because of their molecular density. With some substances being more difficult to determine the exact amounts, it would be nearly impossible to have 100% accuracy on some of them. While with this information, people have still been able to construct healthy diets. If it were not for the accuracy of these labels, there would be not be an opportunity for anyone to be healthy, or anyone to commit to a healthy lifestyle. For example, with the knowledge of certain ingredients in what I eat, I have been able to easily and healthily change my diet. Simply put, the Food and Drug Administration is honest with the public and tries to keep people healthy. However, not only does the FDA try to keep

First and foremost people may have health problems and they're probably not supposed to eat certain things. That's the first reason.

Labeling food is a good thing. Many people in the world have started working out and watching what they eat. Labeling food can help people choose the food that they want and how to balance it. If food was labeled many people could be in shape and not over weight. Many people that keep a good nutrition because of the labels are slim and in a great physical form. Labeling has proven to decrease the percent of people that are over weight. The author of ,"Label the Meals," stated that ever since it was a law to label food that people have been more physical and productive.

Before revealing the details about the rule, an overview of the memo will be provided. This memo will describe the rule “Food Labeling: Revision of the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels”, which was proposed by the Food and Drug Administration. The memo will be broken down into three different paragraphs. The first major point of the memo will be the background and the summary of the rule. The second point will be about the industries impacted by this rule and other important information about it, such as the most important changes of the rule. The third point will be an extended discussion of what affected companies/industries will have to do should this rule go into effect. Such allocation of the information will help to better understand the main points of the rule and how does it affect many companies.

An excellent example of a lack of label information stems from the health issues Americans face with the overconsumption of saturated and trans fats. The Center for Science In the Public Interest (CSPI), estimated in 2002 that “simply disclosing trans fat on food labels would save between 2,100 and 5,600 lives each year.” Despite

This affects you. It's your life. You should at least be aware or slightly concerned of what you're eating. There are people out there like pregnant women, sick people, and informed consumers that make decisions from these labels. We live in the age of information and have the capability to search up anything from our phones, even right there in the supermarket. The big picture boils down to that with advances in any technology that may even be seen as beneficial from a medical point of view, consumers should have the right to make their own decision what they’re actually

On the other hand, some people may argue that, that is why many companies provide food labeling to allow the customer to read what the food contains. According to the article “Food Labels” on Better Health Channels, they state that the food labeling is there to inform the people of the ingredients contained in the foods. Clearly, we can see that the food labeling is their and its up to the customer to read the label. The label is there to help the people make good food choices.

There are many things that are confusing and overwhelming when it comes to making nutritious choices. One product will have a high content of something good and another will have low content in something bad. When it is time to consider what we put in our bodies we have ample opportunity to weight the pros and cons of various products. According to the Nielsen Global Survey in 2011 sixty percent of the population doesn’t not understand the mandatory nutritional code in order to properly identify the ingredients they are considering ingesting. Alarmingly, this statistic is that the nutrition label and the ingredients list are the only true allies a consumer has when determining what we should be eating. Only they tell the full story of what the food we are consuming is comprised of. For this assignment I was asked to first select two pairs of similar food products from the supermarket and then secondly compare them, while critically evaluating both their food labels and ingredients. I chose to compare coconut milk against 2% dairy milk and rolled oats versus steel cut oats. I am going to address the following comparisons in the body of my essay: the nutrition facts table, serving sizes, price, ingredients, product claims, percentage of daily value (%DV), whether they are part of a healthy eating plan, and lastly whether their labeling is clear and concise. On the war against obesity and disease caused by diet, food labels and ingredient lists are the consumers’

Not only are food industries attempting to bring in consumers to reach for their products from habit, but also misguiding them from the labeling. Food industries started “Clean Labeling” their products because consumers began to notice the list of long chemicals in the ingredients of children's fruit snacks. “Clean Labeling” is the replacing of “label polluters”, or unpleasant sounding ingredients, with much nicer sounding alternatives. For example, they may use tomato concentrate instead of food coloring on their package, as more consumers would prefer to see the name of a vegetable over the latter option. Food consumers also label their products with health claims, or even use the name of the product to suggest it is healthy. Companies may use labels such as “low-fat” or “contains whole wheat” to make an impression that the food is healthy when, in reality, it is not. The “low-fat” products are likely products in which the company reduced the fat concentration by adding in much larger quantities of sugar. The “contains whole wheat” label is often a product filled with sugar, salt, saturated fat and wheat is more than likely not the first ingredient. The food industry has also promoted their products by name. When schools rid their vending machines of soft