Food Labeling Research Paper

The Federal Government should require labeling of GMO’s on genetically modified foods. The people deserve to know what they put in their bodies. Some of the food is very unhealthy and some people are completely unaware of that fact. Many food companies do not put out all the information about what goes into the food in which we consume, if the Federal government were to require labeling of all GMO foods then the people could be well educated about what they put inside their bodies, and know if it is good for them or not. GMO stands for genetically modified foods, a genetically modified food is “..an organism whose genome has been altered by the techniques of genetic engineering so that its DNA contains one or more genes not normally found

The safety of our country's food has been weighing heavily on my mind in recent weeks. I recently lost my husband to cancer and he was only 62. I feel deeply that the problem is in our food supply. Cancer has doubled in recent years, and we have to take a close look at why this has happened. I support the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015, and I hope that you will too.

I don't consider myself a political activist, but I've sent a letter or two to politicians when I've felt strongly about an issue. I am writing to you now to urge you to pass H.R. 1599. Coming from an agricultural state, I am troubled by the lack of a consistent standard with respect to the labeling of GMO foods. This legislation, also known as the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act, would bring consistency and uniformity to what is quickly becoming a quagmire of competing state regulations.

There are varied arguments that favor or are against compulsory labeling of genetically engineered food products. Those who argue for the labeling of such products argue that consumers have a right to know what is contained in their food, particularly food products for which there have been health and environmental concerns (Caswell 26). Compulsory labeling will permit consumers to identify and avoid those food products that may cause them problems. On the contrary, those who argue against mandatory labeling point out that

After presenting the arguments of supporters and opponents of the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act. This paper will now analyze each issue to determine the strengths and weakness of each side’s arguments. One argument that proponents make about genetically modified foods is that they are no different than natural foods. An argument that opponents make is that genetically modified organisms have not been tested enough because they are fairly new and some scientist truly don’t have a understanding of how it will effect humans bodies differently than natural foods. Proponents argue that genetically engineered foods have no needs for labeling; it would lead to consumer confusion. Opponents argue that consumers have the right to know what is

Labeling menu choices should not become a law, it should not become a law because it is ineffective, in most cases do not change the way people eat, and it would effect businesses who sell foods with high calories or fat.

Should reading the food labels be necessary before buying and consuming? During this paper, there will be some differences on two authors and their point of view on labeling.The first paragraph explains why Gary Hirshberg agrees that there needs to be labels on food and the importance of doing it. The second paragraph will state why John Davis is against it, and explains labeling is a bad for the people and for the economy.

Be sure to check out Part 3 of this blog post to learn more about our country’s labeling laws and the legislation that governs the food

One of the biggest issues in the ongoing debate over GM foods is whether they should be labeled to protect the public’s right-to-know privileges. Mandatory labeling regulations in European nations and several other countries are making a deeper examination of this issue in the United States (Ross). Even though some countries have mandated GMO labeling, the US should not mandate such law.

According to the FDA in the FD&C Act, they do not pre-approve food labels they only regulate them after they are produced and put onto the packaging of the product, accessed on the FDA’s website. This reveals how much the FDA doesn’t actually look into the labels that are being provided, if they meet the “regulations” then their is no further questions asked. The FDA is supposed to be keeping the customers and consumers safe from harmful foods, but they just keeping overlooking the labels that we depend on to be right. One way that the FD&C Act could be more specific is make it a regulation, in this act, to check the labels before they are printed, by doing this then the FPLA will be made more specific. If both of these act’s work together in the process of food regulations and reevaluating the “rules” that everyone depends on, the food that is being eaten will be made safer since companies will not be able to get away with it anymore. Furthermore the FPLA Act is vague, as it was mentioned earlier there are only three major requirements that need to be made in order to have a label on the packaging itself. This act was made to prevent the deception of customers, but it’s not really doing it’s job. This act doesn’t define what they can and can’t use when making the labels for instance certain word choices, “‘Made with’ often means ‘made with very little,’” said Bonnie Liebman,

I have noticed the absurd price increases in grocery stores lately. For example, I am a baker and one week I went to BJ's and bought a 60-count pack of eggs for $5.99. The next week, that same pack was $12.99! The associates said the increase was because of bird flu, but whatever the cause, I will soon need to get a couple of chickens in the backyard! Who can afford these outrageous prices?! If we didn't have to eat, we'd be rich and skinny! That is why I think it is very important for Congress to ensure we have a single, less costly national standard for labeling food products. The sooner you pass the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015, the better.

Rep. Pompeo's bill ignores this consumer demand for information. Instead, it ties the hands of state governments, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the Food and Drug Administration concerning GMO labeling where it is fatally flawed(Walsh).”In a survey of New York Times found that 93% of Americans believe that foods containing GMO ingredients should be labeled(walsh). However, we're still a long way from that happening. At the very least, the National Organic Program should implement the 2007 recommendation of the National Organic Standard Board that clones and their offspring should be excluded from the USDA certified organic products, and the consumers who want avoid clones and their offspring in meat and milk products would have a viable

Studies show that the average American eats at home about two-thirds of the time. In result to this, the majority is not living a healthy life. On the other hand this is a good thing that some people do not look at labels. Even if they do not look at labels, does not mean they are not healthy. The food labeling law was acted out and people don’t even use the food labels.

The same research also discovered that these customers, on average, consume 400 calories fewer than they did without their meal's nutritional information. That means that out of the 33% of Americans that consume their calories away from home, 8% of those people will, on average, consume 400 calories less than what they did before. In other words, 8% of Americans will start to live a healthier lifestyle. It may not be what the number we hoped for, but it's a start. There may be one countermeasure to this otherwise incredible idea. Food labeling menu choices could become a nuisance to restaurants. Most of the time, restaurants use ingredients that have a high fat content in their recipes. If food labeling were to become a law, menu choices would have to be replaced with healthier options. That would take time and possibly decrease a restaurant's business. However, this would only be a temporary. As soon as restaurants start serving healthier options, business would boom, and people will become healthier. The governments goal would be

Abstract: A food label is the tool that helps the manufacturer communicate with the consumer. Consumers in each country will have different expectations from the food label. This paper seeks to present a comparison between the positive and negative aspects of mandatory labeling in Canada Versus India.