For Descartes And More One Common Dominator Between The

1523 WordsMar 12, 20177 Pages
For Descartes and More one common dominator between the two is the belief that the essence of the body is merely extension. Within the Fifth Meditation, Descartes addresses a premise that results in being the building block to his conception on extension being the essence of bodies. He asserts, we can’t know that physical stuff exists without a doubt considering deception, for instance the dream dilemma presented by Descartes. Hence, how do I know objectively and soundly that my sensory knowledge isn’t deceiving me of my reality. For instance, I could envision and illusion in a dream that I’m writing my exam via the University of Toronto cafeteria however be visualizing it solely in my dream. Descartes uses that premise to fixate his…show more content…
For descartes, his premise remains the essence of bodies does not necessitate around our perception(senses), since it would exist regardless of our commonly held account. Therefore, Descartes defies More’s perception which remains that all matter necessitates around being detectable by ones senses. Instead he takes the polarizing stance, by stating that all matter is unnoticeable, if it gets segregated into smaller parts(divisibility) it still remains consistent throughout. He depicts this ideology in an example by claiming “ a body can retain its whole bodily nature without being soft or hard or cold or hot to the senses-indeed without have any perceptible quality” (Letters to More,1649).However, for More his premise relies dependent on the clause that extension does not necessitate on divisibility. He uses a metaphor on light to illustrate his perception, “The parts of a Spirit can be no more separated, though they be dilated, than you can cut off the Rayes of the Sun by a pair of Scissors made of pellucid Crystall” (More 1662). He uses this depiction to showcase that similarly to light, bodies indeed are extended yet in essence indivisible. Henry More premise behind his constructed points were that he was a dualist, however argued that all substances are extended. Yet, how did he differ between immaterial and material substances

    More about For Descartes And More One Common Dominator Between The

      Open Document