For Dog Park Research Paper

Before you jump to the hasty conclusion that I’m opposed to a dog park because I do not have a dog, let me assure you I do have a dog and am aware of my responsibilities as an owner. The principal argument for a dog park is “exercise is important to dogs’ mental and physical health.” I would take this argument a step further and state exercise is also

The town has a scarce amount of public space for recreation so I believe that when things are created they should equally serve all the towns people. The town already has a very low amount of public goods and for the goods that are available they're too pricey for everyone to attend. I feel that it would be a good idea to make a dog park, but they should also split it into two and make another park that's usable for the towns people and children. That way nobody will feel left out and they can make the best use of the small public space availability. Also the local schools would be very close to the dog park so the children could make use of the park if it was for both pets and

Dogs should have their own parks,because when dogs aren't getting the physical and mental excercise that they need, their behavior tend to get worse. ASPCA has a study that shows the rate of dogs biting humans went down drastically in places where they're dog parks. ASPCA also believes that if dogs had a park then their would be less incidents of dogs attacking humans,barking, and destroying things. Many dog owners have given their dogs up , because they started to act like''bad dogs'', this is because they don't have a dog park to excercise all their energy everyday. Dogs need a park just like humans.

Proper exercise would help maintain a dog's emotional stability - an emotionally stable dog is one that doesn't destroy property or harm innocent passer-by. This is supported when the author states, "According to the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), dogs that don't get exercise can act out by barking and destroying things at home. Socializing is important to. If a dog doesn't learn to get along with other dogs, it may attack a strange dog or a person." However, an important point is mentioned in, "No Dog Park for Muscatine" - dogs will still be capable of biting another dog or person, and this added risk could mean that an attack would lead to a lawsuit, both involving the owner of the dog, and the city, as it would be on public ground. This risk, however, is and will always be prevelant when a dog is able to interact with another person or animal - and, as stated within "A Dog Park Benefits All", "When New York City started allowing dogs off-leash in dog parks, dog-bite reports went from 40,000 to fewer than 4,000 per year". This evidence shows that a dog park will decrease the risk of a dog-related attack, not increase it. For this reason, concerns relating to the health of the dog can be answered with building a public dog

I believe one of the biggest problems that they face if the dog park is bulit will be the noise. As stated in the article the average dog bark can reach 75 decibels and large

Limiting a dog's physical activity can lead to many other problems such as dog-bite reports increasing, crowded dog shelters, and bad behaved dogs. Adding a dog park will only befenfit the growth of city in many aspects. Property values will increase and lawsuits should decrease, because dogs are proven to be more well behaved when active and social with one another.

Studies show that roughly 2 million pet dogs end up in the shelter every year from lack of exercise or being lonely. That alone should be a hint that building a dog park could benefit us. You can even think of the park as a therapy treatment for your companion. It can also benefit a lot of citizens from Muscatine, because nearly 70% of their residents live in Rental units(mostly buildings), which means there is very limited space and areas to where you can bring your pet. The less freedom the more you risk giving your dog the chance to act out, destroy furniture, etc.. and you don't want that.

The need Muscatine, Iowa has for a dog park is a difficult topic. Dog owners have lamented over the fact that there is no safe and legal area for them to allow their dogs to exercise in. In oppistion non-dog owners feel that the construction of a dog park would hamper their ability to peacefully live their life. Whilst there are difficulties to building a dog park for the community, I believe the pros out weigh the cons.

Both passages have valid points,But here's how I see it I feel that a dog park would be A good place for A community because. Dogs need sometime out of the day to play and run around and exercise. And A tiny private yard Isn't enough for a Dog at all dog parks provide the freedom to your dog to run around and play and exercise. And A dog park would also benefeit the dog owner by letting your dog go out and exercise and play, and training there dog it will become more obidient. And training your dog will help when say for instince your trying to go to sleep because you have to work in the morning and you your dog to be quiet with training it'll take one command and the dog will sit and be quiet or go to sleep as well. So i feel there should

I disagree with the person from the first passage because if a dog is off its leash it could attack other animals and people. For example, in the second passage it states that if a dog is off its leash and attacks another dog or person the victim can rightfully sue bothe the dog's owner and the city. So if a person or animal were to be attacked by a dog at a dog park it could end in a very big lawsuit that could possibly lead to the park being shut down which would've made all the effort and money they put into it goto waste.

Well, here we have two differentes points of view, the first one expones very good arguments about it, and the second mmm.... it seems only like a personal opinion, not strong enough, obviosly one loves dogs and the other one does not. Lets go and check this.

The issue reguarding whether there should be a dog park in any city can be reasonably argued both ways. Some people say that the dog park would raise the noise level and disturb people's sleep, and this could be reasonable, except that in a city there are a lot more louder noises to worry about than a dog barking. Also, nobody I know is going to take their dog to the park at night time. Whether or not the dogs in your local city are feral or not seems a lot more important than keeping the noise down. Especially if dogs will be walking down the street instead of at a dog park, and there are always dogs in the city. This is supported by the dramatic decrease of dog bites reported anually in New York (40,000 to 4,000)after they could be a

Would you rather have a dog park, or be the victim of a dog-bite? I would perfer to have a dog park for safety. Some dogs have a temper like us adults and can act up at times. Because it's our city ordinance for dogs to be off-leash in public areas, a park is needed. Personally I believe that, exercise is important to dogs because of it's mental and physical health, socializing, and bad behavior caused by dogs.To begin with,exercise is important to dogs because dogs can act out by barking and destroying things at home. If a dog isn't getting enough exercise it can become very cruel. A dog can obtain mental and physical health problems. With that being said our neighborhood need a dog park.

I think that it is a great idea to build a dog park because just like that passage stated exercise is important to a dog's mental and physical health lack of exercise can also cause alot of health problems for dogs from the lack of being able to walk around for example dog obesity lack of fresh air and freedom also leads to dogs barking and destroying things in their owners home. another reason why a dog bark is a excellent idea because dogs need to socialize with other dogs and other humans beings because in some cases dogs will attack other humans and other animals from the lack of not knowing them. I think dog biting accidents would stop if dogs were giving the proper tools to release some energy and frustration. a dog park is also a

As it is listed in the passage, "Dog parks have been shown to raise property values in their communities. Property in the city would be in high demand sice the 37% of Americans who own dogs often look for a dog park when choosing where to live." Therefore by creating a dog park, more people could be attracted to a community because of that reason. I also feel that it could benefit the community by getting to meet new people and by creating those healthy friendships that everyone desires and needs. Having a dog park could also create new hobbies for a person and could create good bonds with your pet. All of these reasons listed in the paragraph are ways that a community could benefit from having a place to go and hangout with their dogs.